Britain Considering a Written Constitution After 800 Years (user search)

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? April 27, 2024, 03:20:38 PM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

General Politics

International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)

Britain Considering a Written Constitution After 800 Years (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Do you think Britain needs a written constitution?

#1 Briton: Yes		2 (3%)
#2 Briton: No		6 (9.1%)
#3 American: Yes		21 (31.8%)
#4 American: No		22 (33.3%)
#5 Everyone else: Yes		8 (12.1%)
#6 Everyone else: No		7 (10.6%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 66

Author

Topic: Britain Considering a Written Constitution After 800 Years (Read 1147 times)

Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution

Posts: 67,721

Re: Britain Considering a Written Constitution After 800 Years

« on: June 08, 2015, 10:32:59 AM »

Simfan makes a good point.

Quote from: Hnv1 on June 08, 2015, 10:15:20 AM

No, usually against written const. plus I think it will just cause more havoc in an already fragile system.

I would tend to agree with this as well. After all the big advantage of an unwritten constitution is flexibility: convention might seem like a worryingly intangible thing to base your system of government around, but it has certain advantages over worrying about the exact placing of a comma in subsection 11(b).

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.