Third Party presidential election, 2008
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 09:33:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Third Party presidential election, 2008		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: All candidates qualifying must have reached 0.05% of the vote in real life.
#1
Ralph Nader of Connecticut (Independent)		  
#2
Bob Barr of Georgia (Libertarian)		  
#3
Charles Baldwin of Florida (Constitution)		  
#4
Cynthia McKinney of Georgia (Green)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 43

Author Topic: Third Party presidential election, 2008  (Read 717 times)
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 09, 2015, 08:31:43 AM »
One day.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,263
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2015, 09:48:37 AM »
McKinney was pleasingly bonkers
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2015, 01:28:53 PM »
Nader, since McKinney was nuts.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2015, 01:37:43 PM »
Baldwin, I guess. This has got to be one of the most depressing selection of third party choices ever.
Logged
sparkey
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,103


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2015, 01:52:51 PM »
Voted for Barr in the actual election, although I wasn't as enthusiastic about him as I was about Johnson in 2012. In retrospect, I wish the Libertarians had picked Mike Gravel.
Logged
SNJ1985
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,277
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.19, S: 7.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 09, 2015, 01:55:11 PM »
Baldwin, enthusiastically.
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 09, 2015, 02:03:00 PM »
Nader I guess.

He wasn't as a fresh as he was in 2000 and was kind of going along but he did better than in 2004 somehow.  I remember he went on Fox News and called Obama an Uncle Tom and pissed everyone off.
 
Barr came off like a jerk in his appearances I remember seeing the third party debate on C-span and being disappointed with his attitude. I felt Nader won that debate.

Gravel as Libertarian would have been interesting though, I could see him pulling a good deal of votes.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,193
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 09, 2015, 02:09:36 PM »
Nader, partially because McKinney turned out nuts, partially because Matt Gonzales would've been decent as a VP.

He certainly would've been a better mayor of SF than Newsom turned out.
Logged
SATW
SunriseAroundTheWorld
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,463
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 09, 2015, 03:48:58 PM »
None. all are horrible.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 09, 2015, 11:13:32 PM »
Nader, even though I still hold a grudge against him for 2000
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2015, 11:38:53 PM »
Ugh, bad choices. Baldwin, I guess.
Logged
Cryptic
Shadowlord88
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 891


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 09, 2015, 11:42:13 PM »
Nader, I guess.
Logged
Comrade Funk
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,178
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -5.91

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2015, 05:41:25 AM »
Nader, easily. Not because he's good, but because the rest are awful.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 14 queries.