1944: Wallace vs. Willkie
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 05:37:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1944: Wallace vs. Willkie
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1944: Wallace vs. Willkie  (Read 862 times)
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,817
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 09, 2015, 02:16:55 PM »

In this scenario, FDR dies one year earlier and Willkie lives on in good health.

April 12, 1944: President Roosevelt dies suddenly and his succeded by Henry Wallace. Under President Wallace the war goes on the same way as it did in real life, but the new leader makes more concessions to Stalin. In July 1944, Wallace norrowly wins the nomination of his party. James F. Byrnes is nominated for Vice President.

Meanwhile, Wendell Willkie defeats Tom Dewey for the Republican nomination. Reluctantly he agrees to run with Ohio Governor John Bricker as his running mate.

How does the election end up, was both candidates were liberals (esepecially on social affairs).
Logged
Thunderbird is the word
Zen Lunatic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2015, 05:30:06 PM »

With Wallace as the Democratic nominee you might see an earlier Dixiecrat breakaway only more severe against Wallace then it would be later against Truman. So Dewey probably wins.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2015, 06:34:23 AM »

With Wallace as the Democratic nominee you might see an earlier Dixiecrat breakaway only more severe against Wallace then it would be later against Truman. So Dewey probably wins.

Wendell Willkie is the nominee in this scenario. But yes, some Southerners would likely name another candidate, as Willkie also strongly supported civil rights.

But you made his VP nom James Byrne?  Seems kind of illogical.
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2015, 04:05:50 PM »

It'll come down to a battle of personas and Willkie would have probably crushed Wallace.  Willkie was a pretty popular guy and he was very John McCain like in how respected he was.

Wallace would get good grades for the war but when it comes to Russia, his social ideas and all the rest he will get downgrades. Defiantly see him pushing civil rights against everyone's desires and causing the southern dems to revolt.  Who would they nominate? Have no clue. But I see it being a southern conservative to appeal for that vote. Maybe Harry Byrd Sr perhaps.


I'd say Willkie wins by a comfortable margin thanks to the split Democratic vote and most of the south goes Dixiecrat.



This is best case for the Dixiecrats.



Best case for Wallace if he goes hard liberal.





If Wallace goes more moderate he could pull off a close one.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2015, 02:07:47 PM »

Like only this matchup could cause me to support Willkie. Ugh.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.