Who Do You Match on iSideWith?

[RFayette]

Rubio, Santorum, Jeb, Cruz, Paul, Carson, Walker, Fiorina, Clinton/Sanders

That quiz really wasn't very good for gauging my preferences because I tend to give very right-wing answers to generalities but am more liberal when it's nuanced.  I also wrote a lot of "custom" answers so I don't know how that affected it.  I mean, I would have a very hard time voting for Santorum or Cruz. 

[Skye]

Walker: 67%
Rubio: 67%
Bush: 66%
...
...
...
...
Clinton: 37%

[Mr. Smith]

97% Bernie, 69% Hillary....1% Fiorina

[Cory]

I got Bernie.

Bernie Sanders: 95% on economic, domestic policy, healthcare, immigration, foreign policy, environmental, social, and education issues.

Hillary Clinton: 85% on domestic policy, economic, foreign policy, healthcare, immigration, environmental, social, and education issues.

Mike Huckabee: 55% on environmental issues.

Rand Paul: 52% on foreign policy issues.

Scott Walker: 21% no major issues.

Carly Fiorina: 11% no major issues.

Ben Carson/Ted Cruz: 7% no major issues.

[aktheden]

Bernie  96%
Hillary 84%

[Mercenary]

Thought Paul would be number 1 but Sanders was. I guess despite favoring localism, I have overall moved somewhat left on economic issues. I did figure Sanders would be in my top 2 though, I tend to place the most emphasis on foreign policy and privacy issues after all.

88% Bernie Sanders
71% Rand Paul
69% Ben Carson
61% Scott Walker
60% Chris Christie
59% Mike Huckabee
58% Marco Rubio
57% Jeb Bush
51% Hillary Clinton
43% Rick Santorum
39% Ted Cruz
24% Carly Fiorina

[Cryptic]

Sanders - 95%
Clinton - 80%
O'Malley - 62%
Bush - 36%
Christie - 27%
Huckabee - 24%
Paul - 17%
Walker - 10%
Carson - 8%
Cruz - 6%
Santorum - 5%
Fiorina - 5%
Rubio - 4%

[eric82oslo]

I got Marco Rubio 4%, Scott Walker 3% and Ted Cruz 0% (LOL!), Bernie Sanders 93% and Hillary Clinton 88%. Also Jeb Bush at 41% and Rand Paul at 31%. Extremely satisfied with my results although I'm shocked (!) at how few percent I ended up giving to Rubio, who I honestly thought would be more centrist than that (but apparently he's at Cruz's level!)

[eric82oslo]

Since when was O'Malley included?

[Crumpets]

Bernie Sanders - 90%
Hillary Clinton - 71%
Martin O'Malley - 62%
Jeb Bush - 52%
Rand Paul - 30%
Mike Huckabee - 25%
Chris Christie - 13%
Ben Carson - 12%
Scott Walker - 4%
Marco Rubio - 3%
Rick Perry 2%
Rick Santorum 1%
Carly Fiorina 0% (lol)

Yeah... still voting for Clinton.

[aktheden]

Bernie Sanders - 90%
Hillary Clinton - 71%
Martin O'Malley - 62%
Jeb Bush - 52%
Rand Paul - 30%
Mike Huckabee - 25%
Chris Christie - 13%
Ben Carson - 12%
Scott Walker - 4%
Marco Rubio - 3%
Rick Perry 2%
Rick Santorum 1%
Carly Fiorina 0% (lol)

Yeah... still voting for Clinton.

I Keep seeing this....Why not vote someone who is closest to your beliefs? Why must you settle?
The Tea Party types don't, and they have been very successful...why not progressives?

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

Bernie Sanders - 90%
Hillary Clinton - 71%
Martin O'Malley - 62%
Jeb Bush - 52%
Rand Paul - 30%
Mike Huckabee - 25%
Chris Christie - 13%
Ben Carson - 12%
Scott Walker - 4%
Marco Rubio - 3%
Rick Perry 2%
Rick Santorum 1%
Carly Fiorina 0% (lol)

Yeah... still voting for Clinton.

I Keep seeing this....Why not vote someone who is closest to your beliefs? Why must you settle?
The Tea Party types don't, and they have been very successful...why not progressives?

Do you see Todd Akin, Christine O'Donnell, Richard Mourdock, Sharron Angle, and Ken Buck in the Senate? Those were 5 safe seats. The GOP really could have a supermajority at the moment.

Winnability is important. Small progress.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

I think they changed the test a bit.

Sanders 95%
Clinton 69%
O'Malley 58%
Bush 56%
Paul 27%
Carson 20%
Huckabee 20%
Christie 19%
Walker 9%
Perry 5%
Fiornia 1%
Santorum 1%
Rubio 0%

[pbrower2a]

Sanders 97%
Clinton 82%
O'Malley 61%
Huckabee 46% (foreign policy)
Paul 30% (foreign policy)
Scott Walker 21% (environment - )
Carson 10%
Fiorina 4%
Carson 2%

[100% pro-life no matter what]

Marco Rubio: 98%
Rick Santorum: 97%
Ted Cruz: 90%
Jeb Bush: 84%
Scott Walker: 84%
Rand Paul: 78%
Chris Christie: 77%
Ben Carson: 77%
Mike Huckabee: 77%
Rick Perry: 73%
Carly Fiorina: 66%

Hillary Clinton: 17%
Martin O'Malley: 16%
Bernie Sanders: 3%

[publicunofficial]

Bernie Sanders - 90%
Hillary Clinton - 71%
Martin O'Malley - 62%
Jeb Bush - 52%
Rand Paul - 30%
Mike Huckabee - 25%
Chris Christie - 13%
Ben Carson - 12%
Scott Walker - 4%
Marco Rubio - 3%
Rick Perry 2%
Rick Santorum 1%
Carly Fiorina 0% (lol)

Yeah... still voting for Clinton.

I Keep seeing this....Why not vote someone who is closest to your beliefs? Why must you settle?
The Tea Party types don't, and they have been very successful...why not progressives?

Do you see Todd Akin, Christine O'Donnell, Richard Mourdock, Sharron Angle, and Ken Buck in the Senate? Those were 5 safe seats. The GOP really could have a supermajority at the moment.

Winnability is important. Small progress.

Exactly.

I agree with Sanders, but he's just a gadfly who'll lose to whoever the GOP nominates. Clinton might be more conservative than me, but I'd rather have her for President than Scott Walker.

[Figueira]

Bernie Sanders - 90%
Hillary Clinton - 71%
Martin O'Malley - 62%
Jeb Bush - 52%
Rand Paul - 30%
Mike Huckabee - 25%
Chris Christie - 13%
Ben Carson - 12%
Scott Walker - 4%
Marco Rubio - 3%
Rick Perry 2%
Rick Santorum 1%
Carly Fiorina 0% (lol)

Yeah... still voting for Clinton.

I Keep seeing this....Why not vote someone who is closest to your beliefs? Why must you settle?
The Tea Party types don't, and they have been very successful...why not progressives?

Do you see Todd Akin, Christine O'Donnell, Richard Mourdock, Sharron Angle, and Ken Buck in the Senate? Those were 5 safe seats. The GOP really could have a supermajority at the moment.

Winnability is important. Small progress.

Exactly.

I agree with Sanders, but he's just a gadfly who'll lose to whoever the GOP nominates. Clinton might be more conservative than me, but I'd rather have her for President than Scott Walker.

Sanders has even less of a chance of winning the primary than the general (as does pretty much every D and R candidate except Hillary), so I'm comfortable voting for him to send a message that I like his positions more than those of any other candidate.

[publicunofficial]

Bernie Sanders - 90%
Hillary Clinton - 71%
Martin O'Malley - 62%
Jeb Bush - 52%
Rand Paul - 30%
Mike Huckabee - 25%
Chris Christie - 13%
Ben Carson - 12%
Scott Walker - 4%
Marco Rubio - 3%
Rick Perry 2%
Rick Santorum 1%
Carly Fiorina 0% (lol)

Yeah... still voting for Clinton.

I Keep seeing this....Why not vote someone who is closest to your beliefs? Why must you settle?
The Tea Party types don't, and they have been very successful...why not progressives?

Do you see Todd Akin, Christine O'Donnell, Richard Mourdock, Sharron Angle, and Ken Buck in the Senate? Those were 5 safe seats. The GOP really could have a supermajority at the moment.

Winnability is important. Small progress.

Exactly.

I agree with Sanders, but he's just a gadfly who'll lose to whoever the GOP nominates. Clinton might be more conservative than me, but I'd rather have her for President than Scott Walker.

Sanders has even less of a chance of winning the primary than the general (as does pretty much every D and R candidate except Hillary), so I'm comfortable voting for him to send a message that I like his positions more than those of any other candidate.

Yeah that's fair. I haven't decided who I'll vote for in the primary quite yet.

[ElectionsGuy]

There are only two people who have gotten Hillary as their #1 match (JerryArkansas and National Progressive) and yet far more are insisting they'll vote for Hillary over Bernie. With the looks of it this forum should be a Bernie paradise.

[Türkisblau]

There are only two people who have gotten Hillary as their #1 match (JerryArkansas and National Progressive) and yet far more are insisting they'll vote for Hillary over Bernie. With the looks of it this forum should be a Bernie paradise.

Well it kind of is a Bernie paradise.

Of course, I got Rick Santorum as my #1 and would never think of voting for him...

[RFayette]

There are only two people who have gotten Hillary as their #1 match (JerryArkansas and National Progressive) and yet far more are insisting they'll vote for Hillary over Bernie. With the looks of it this forum should be a Bernie paradise.

Well it kind of is a Bernie paradise.

Of course, I got Rick Santorum as my #1 and would never think of voting for him...

Yeah.  Santorum was my #2.  But the social issues they asked about touched on more socon elements (like abortion & religious freedom), but a lot of the things I'm more socially liberal on were not touched upon.

[TJ in Oregon]

The Rickster unsurprisingly.

Santorum 90%
Rubio 89%
Cruz 85%
Huckabee 83%
Christie 76%
Carson 76%
Bush 74%
Walker 72%
Paul 57%
Perry 55%
Fiorina 54%
O'Malley 46%
Clinton 28%
Sanders 25%

The only interesting note for the subcategories is that I apparently agree with Paul the most on Foreign policy.

[TJ in Oregon]

Bernie Sanders - 90%
Hillary Clinton - 71%
Martin O'Malley - 62%
Jeb Bush - 52%
Rand Paul - 30%
Mike Huckabee - 25%
Chris Christie - 13%
Ben Carson - 12%
Scott Walker - 4%
Marco Rubio - 3%
Rick Perry 2%
Rick Santorum 1%
Carly Fiorina 0% (lol)

Yeah... still voting for Clinton.

I Keep seeing this....Why not vote someone who is closest to your beliefs? Why must you settle?
The Tea Party types don't, and they have been very successful...why not progressives?

Do you see Todd Akin, Christine O'Donnell, Richard Mourdock, Sharron Angle, and Ken Buck in the Senate? Those were 5 safe seats. The GOP really could have a supermajority at the moment.

Winnability is important. Small progress.

Akin wasn't a Tea Partier. However, the point about electability still stands.

[Fuzzybigfoot]

Mine

[Crumpets]

Bernie Sanders - 90%
Hillary Clinton - 71%
Martin O'Malley - 62%
Jeb Bush - 52%
Rand Paul - 30%
Mike Huckabee - 25%
Chris Christie - 13%
Ben Carson - 12%
Scott Walker - 4%
Marco Rubio - 3%
Rick Perry 2%
Rick Santorum 1%
Carly Fiorina 0% (lol)

Yeah... still voting for Clinton.

I Keep seeing this....Why not vote someone who is closest to your beliefs? Why must you settle?
The Tea Party types don't, and they have been very successful...why not progressives?

Do you see Todd Akin, Christine O'Donnell, Richard Mourdock, Sharron Angle, and Ken Buck in the Senate? Those were 5 safe seats. The GOP really could have a supermajority at the moment.

Winnability is important. Small progress.

This, as well as the fact that I worry Sanders has a bit too import-substitution-industrialization-esque economic policy, and I don't have the confidence he could get any of his policies through congress. I have voted left-wing in the past, but only if I thought the candidate had a decent chance of winning and would be balanced out by moderates.