Who Do You Match on iSideWith?

[Eraserhead]

88% Sanders
65% Clinton

[sparkey]

For me:
1. Paul 87%
2. Carson 71%
3. Sanders 71%
...
13. Clinton 43%
14. Fiorina 39%
Very similar to OP.

Did they add Rick Perry after this thread started?

[Beezer]

I guess I'm a libertarian Democratic Socialist.

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

bernie 95%
hillary 79%
o'malley 62%
jeb 37%
rand 33%
christie 20%
huckster 20%
carson 13%
frothy 12%
cruz 4%
walker 3%
perry 3%
fiorina 2%
rubio 1%

[Hydera]

Bernie Sanders - 90%
Hillary Clinton - 71%
Martin O'Malley - 62%
Jeb Bush - 52%
Rand Paul - 30%
Mike Huckabee - 25%
Chris Christie - 13%
Ben Carson - 12%
Scott Walker - 4%
Marco Rubio - 3%
Rick Perry 2%
Rick Santorum 1%
Carly Fiorina 0% (lol)

Yeah... still voting for Clinton.

I Keep seeing this....Why not vote someone who is closest to your beliefs? Why must you settle?
The Tea Party types don't, and they have been very successful...why not progressives?

Do you see Todd Akin, Christine O'Donnell, Richard Mourdock, Sharron Angle, and Ken Buck in the Senate? Those were 5 safe seats. The GOP really could have a supermajority at the moment.

Winnability is important. Small progress.

This, as well as the fact that I worry Sanders has a bit too import-substitution-industrialization-esque economic policy, and I don't have the confidence he could get any of his policies through congress. I have voted left-wing in the past, but only if I thought the candidate had a decent chance of winning and would be balanced out by moderates.

If he were ever to win his economic policy would have an ass chance of passing congress.

If he even wins. Then 2018 is going to be a major slaughter as well as 2020.

The 2016 election is for just three things. Socially liberal viewpoints like gay rights, access to abortion and birth control and etc. Second is Making sure obamacare doesn't get repealed and making sure the US doesnt get super involved in foreign entanglements the GOP loves to get into like in iraq where we wasted trillions of dollars.  These are good points to vote democrat for but i think some democrats are scared to admit that anything else their not going to get eapecially on their economic views.

Bernie sanders is the liberal answer to ted cruz and he's going to damage the democrat brand real hard.

[WVdemocrat]

I side with Bernie. No surprise here. He would only win if he ran against a nut, though.

[aktheden]

Bernie Sanders - 90%
Hillary Clinton - 71%
Martin O'Malley - 62%
Jeb Bush - 52%
Rand Paul - 30%
Mike Huckabee - 25%
Chris Christie - 13%
Ben Carson - 12%
Scott Walker - 4%
Marco Rubio - 3%
Rick Perry 2%
Rick Santorum 1%
Carly Fiorina 0% (lol)

Yeah... still voting for Clinton.

I Keep seeing this....Why not vote someone who is closest to your beliefs? Why must you settle?
The Tea Party types don't, and they have been very successful...why not progressives?

Do you see Todd Akin, Christine O'Donnell, Richard Mourdock, Sharron Angle, and Ken Buck in the Senate? Those were 5 safe seats. The GOP really could have a supermajority at the moment.

Winnability is important. Small progress.

This is the primary..vote the person closest to your beliefs

[aktheden]

Bernie Sanders - 90%
Hillary Clinton - 71%
Martin O'Malley - 62%
Jeb Bush - 52%
Rand Paul - 30%
Mike Huckabee - 25%
Chris Christie - 13%
Ben Carson - 12%
Scott Walker - 4%
Marco Rubio - 3%
Rick Perry 2%
Rick Santorum 1%
Carly Fiorina 0% (lol)

Yeah... still voting for Clinton.

I Keep seeing this....Why not vote someone who is closest to your beliefs? Why must you settle?
The Tea Party types don't, and they have been very successful...why not progressives?

Do you see Todd Akin, Christine O'Donnell, Richard Mourdock, Sharron Angle, and Ken Buck in the Senate? Those were 5 safe seats. The GOP really could have a supermajority at the moment.

Winnability is important. Small progress.

Exactly.

I agree with Sanders, but he's just a gadfly who'll lose to whoever the GOP nominates. Clinton might be more conservative than me, but I'd rather have her for President than Scott Walker.

Wow..seens you have developed psychic powers..can you see into the future?

[aktheden]

Bernie Sanders - 90%
Hillary Clinton - 71%
Martin O'Malley - 62%
Jeb Bush - 52%
Rand Paul - 30%
Mike Huckabee - 25%
Chris Christie - 13%
Ben Carson - 12%
Scott Walker - 4%
Marco Rubio - 3%
Rick Perry 2%
Rick Santorum 1%
Carly Fiorina 0% (lol)

Yeah... still voting for Clinton.

I Keep seeing this....Why not vote someone who is closest to your beliefs? Why must you settle?
The Tea Party types don't, and they have been very successful...why not progressives?

Do you see Todd Akin, Christine O'Donnell, Richard Mourdock, Sharron Angle, and Ken Buck in the Senate? Those were 5 safe seats. The GOP really could have a supermajority at the moment.

Winnability is important. Small progress.

This, as well as the fact that I worry Sanders has a bit too import-substitution-industrialization-esque economic policy, and I don't have the confidence he could get any of his policies through congress. I have voted left-wing in the past, but only if I thought the candidate had a decent chance of winning and would be balanced out by moderates.

this kind of thinking is exactly what is killing progressives...vote your beliefs.. not "electability"

[RJEvans]

Sanders: 85%
Clinton: 83% (Not much of a statistical difference from Sanders. Voting for her.)
O'Malley: 74%
Bush: 69%
Santorum: 54% (WHAT?!)
Paul: 51%
Rubio: 39%
Christie: 37%
Huckabee: 31%
Walker: 25%
Carson: 23%
Cruz: 20%
Fiorina: 19%
Perry: 7%

[Leinad]

Here's mine:

Rand - 79% - (on most things, but he's a bit too conservative)
Bernie - 79% - (not on economic issues)
Walker - 71% - (makes sense, he's among my top GOP candidates, but I probably won't vote for him)
Carson - 68% - (nope)
Jeb - 66% - (don't want a Bush Trilogy)
Rubio - 64% - (a Rubio Presidency would be more palatable than most of the big party candidates)
Hillary - 63% - (nope)
Cruz - 60% - (I'll take small government Cruz, I guess, but not theocratic Cruz)
Perry - 58% - (not sure why all these tests think I like Perry...I don't...)
Huckabee - 58% - (theocratic populist, but he's likable)
Santorum - 56% - (weak Huckabee)
Christie - 56% - (nope)
O'Malley - 56%
Fiorina - 36%

Dodgy numbers. Basically everyone from Walker to O'Malley are too high. Rand's probably a little too low.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

I still don't understand how I side with an avowed socialist 74% of the time, but whatever.

[eric82oslo]

I still don't understand how I side with an avowed socialist 74% of the time, but whatever.

Maybe you like income redistribution too.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

I still don't understand how I side with an avowed socialist 74% of the time, but whatever.

Maybe you like income redistribution too.

I support corporate tax reform (lower to about 28% while eliminating most loopholes) and raising payroll taxes on the rich, if that counts. 

[King]

Did Sanders supporters write this quiz? What a bunch of softball questions and answers.

[Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon]

Rubio 77%
Bush 77%
Santorum 73%
Paul 73%
Walker 71%
Sanders 68% ()
Carson 67%
Cruz 65%

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

I think the reason the reason that no one has a good match with Clinton is that she's too triangulating for her own good. She probably doesn't even get a good match with herself, because all of the triangulating is confusing and hard to keep track of.