GOP Primary Atlas Poll, June 2015: Results in.

[retromike22]

This poll lasts for one week, and each month on the 15th there will be a new round. Only official (major) candidates who have announced by that date will be included.

Please vote only if you actually plan to vote in a GOP primary. You can always change your vote before the polling period has ended.

Results from last month: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=212875.0

Rand Paul     (44.8%)
Marco Rubio    (24.1%)
Ted Cruz    (10.3%)
Carly Fiorina    (10.3%)
Mike Huckabee     (6.9%)
Ben Carson    (3.4%)

Results:



Note: I decided to delete the results of April 2015, simply because with only three candidates the graph would be too stretched out to see the differences between the minor candidates.

[RINO Tom]

Pataki, but I will support Kasich when he's formally in.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Rahhhhnd Pawl!

[TJ in Oregon]

WI: John Kasich

But of those names listed, probably Rubio.

[JonathanSwift]

Rand Paul.

[Abraham Reagan]

Jeb Bush. He's a man of integrity and conviction and is spreading the message of a GOP based on inclusive, positive, and reform minded conservatism.

[ElectionsGuy]

Rand Paul.

[tmthforu94]

Fiorina - switching to Bush, actually. I'm pretty undecided right now. I think he's the most electable candidate we have.


I will likely switch to Kasich when he joins the field.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Jeb Bush. He's a man of integrity and conviction and is spreading the message of a GOP based on inclusive, positive, and reform minded conservatism.

I thought his announcement was superb. 


I lean towards Paul amongs this crowd though. I will go for Kasich once he is in though.

[SATW]

Rubio.

[daveosupremo]

I voted Cruz, but besides Walker right now it's a toss up between Cruz, Paul, and Fiorina.

[100% pro-life no matter what]

I guess Rubio, but Bush, Santorum, and Perry would all be contenders as well.

[AelroseB]

In Virginia, I can vote in either primary.  For the Republicans, I'd choose Huckabee.

[RINO Tom]

I kind of wonder if we'll go back to a mid-Twentieth Century style foreign policy debate between the two parties, with conservatives being more isolationist and liberals being more interventionist.  Polls show younger Republicans - who are MUCH more libertarian than their parents and grandparents - just might steer the party in that direction and away from its Cold War "tough on Communism" stances.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

I kind of wonder if we'll go back to a mid-Twentieth Century style foreign policy debate between the two parties, with conservatives being more isolationist and liberals being more interventionist.  Polls show younger Republicans - who are MUCH more libertarian than their parents and grandparents - just might steer the party in that direction and away from its Cold War "tough on Communism" stances.

Modern liberals are neither isolationist nor interventionist. They just want a sane foreign policy of diplomacy, and not the stupid warmongering we've been doing in the middle east for decades.

[RINO Tom]

I kind of wonder if we'll go back to a mid-Twentieth Century style foreign policy debate between the two parties, with conservatives being more isolationist and liberals being more interventionist.  Polls show younger Republicans - who are MUCH more libertarian than their parents and grandparents - just might steer the party in that direction and away from its Cold War "tough on Communism" stances.

Modern liberals are neither isolationist nor interventionist. They just want a sane foreign policy of diplomacy, and not the stupid warmongering we've been doing in the middle east for decades.

I said MORE interventionist, as in MORE interventionist COMPARED to libertarian-minded Republicans.  But please, take the forum to point out that the liberal view on the issue is the perfect median of sanity, just as I'm sure you think every other one of your views is.

[retromike22]

Results from this month's poll posted.