States with large shifts from 2012 to 2016
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:51:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  States with large shifts from 2012 to 2016
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: States with large shifts from 2012 to 2016  (Read 675 times)
zorkpolitics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,188
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 10, 2016, 03:11:48 PM »
« edited: December 10, 2016, 03:20:07 PM by zorkpolitics »

Nationally the US popular vote shift from Democrats to Republicans between 2012 and 2016 was only 1.8%.  https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/133Eb4qQmOxNvtesw2hdVns073R68EZx4SfCnP4IGQf8/htmlview?usp=sharing&sle=true
But Trump won because of a much larger shift of 5.4% in the 13 swing states.  This certainly indicates his campaign was better received in the states where he and Clinton competed head to head, so clearly his message to voters was better.  
This also gives some credence to his argument that he might have won the popular vote if he campaigned nationally, since an uniform shift of 5.4% would have given him a popular vote win.

Looking at the 11 states with a >9% shift in popular vote to the GOP from 2012 clearly shows some possible emerging trends.
Four states are in the Mid-west:
Ohio         11.10%
Michigan   9.70%
Missouri    9.20%
Iowa        15.20%

Three states are in New England:
Vermont          9.20%
Rhode Island   11.90%
Maine             12.60%

Looking at the only 3 states with a >5% shift in popular vote to the Democrats clearly shows a trend due to an increasing Latino population.
California   7.20%
Texas        6.80%
Arizona     5.50%

If these trends continue, the GOP may find much of the North outside of IL, NY, and MA much more competitive, while the Southeast trends towards the Democrats,  leading to the largest change in the electoral map since Clinton.




Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,662
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2016, 04:27:31 PM »
« Edited: December 10, 2016, 04:30:01 PM by AKCreative »

In the case of Vermont, around 13% of the vote was for third party candidates, and Trump only got around 3k more votes than Romney (both of them got around 30%-31% of the total vote).  It might just be a case of general dislike of Hillary there.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2016, 04:33:59 PM »

Maine should be treated more as a swing state and not a solid blue state. It was almost the state closest to the national popular vote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.228 seconds with 13 queries.