I should clarify that I'm not clear on what exactly has happened in the Pacific, and I did not mean for my comment to indict anyone, Kal included. My point is that evidence of a crime needs to include evidence of action from the person accused, not just a report from the GM that could have been formulated without anyone else's involvement.
Once again: Turkisblau called for protests, so I merely reacted to this producing one news about one demonstration in SF.
He's being charged not because any report made by me, but because of Simfan's removal from power, and that happened without my slightest involvement nor inspiration.
Of course if I had wrote "Turkisblau did XXX" that wouldn't be a ground for him being charged with anything and it would be unacceptable for GM to invent anybody's actions. That didn't happen, so please stop implying things that simply aren't true, especially if you're, as you've admitted, "not clear on what exactly has happened in the Pacific".
I never meant to turn this into anything like that, seriously. I should have put "accomplished" instead of did in my original post.
As to whether starting a civic activist organization is treason or not, we'll get to see that in the upcoming court case tomorrow! Hold onto your seats everyone, we're wasting our time with frivolous court cases!