1952 Election (The Hearse at Monticello)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 12:37:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1952 Election (The Hearse at Monticello)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: For President and Vice President
#1
President Eleanor Roosevelt (P-NY)/ Vice President Harry S Truman (P-MO)
 
#2
Fmr. Governor John W. Bricker (A-OH)/ Congressman Richard Nixon (A-CA)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 45

Author Topic: 1952 Election (The Hearse at Monticello)  (Read 1518 times)
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 25, 2015, 06:52:46 PM »

After three days of frantic maneuvering, former Governor John W. Bricker was nominated by the American Party to be their candidate for president in 1952, bringing one of the most suspenceful conventions in recent memory to a close. Many within the establishment were relieved by the choice, not only because Bricker represented a strong affirmation of the party's conservative roots, but also because the nomination of the controversial Joe McCarthy, the self-appointed leader of the "Anti-Communits Crusade" in Congress, had been averted. In reality, McCarthy had played a larger role in Bricker's nomination than anyone was willing to acknowledge, stepping aside only after the Ohioan had agreed to select McCarthy's right-hand man, Congressman Richard Nixon of California, as his running mate.

As expected, President Eleanor Roosevelt was renominated without much trouble by the Populists and now faces the concerted opposition of the American Party as she takes to the campaign trail. While the two candidates have clashed over domestic policy, with Bricker calling for the repeal of Roosevelt's National Health Service Act and and passage of a "Right-to-Work" Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the primary theme of the campaign has been foreign policy, and more specifically the war against Communism. While Bricker has accused Roosevelt of "loosing China" to the Red Menace and argued that stronger action is needed to stem the Communist tide at home, Roosevelt has argued that close cooperation with the League of Nations is the surest way to keep the peace and protect American interests abroad. Vice President Truman, meanwhile, had unsparingly laid into the opposition, whose accusations he dismisses as "plain hokum".

The choice is yours. Try not to destroy the country.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,322
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2015, 07:02:43 PM »

After three days of frantic maneuvering, former Governor John W. Bricker was nominated by the American Party to be their candidate for president in 1952, bringing one of the most suspenceful conventions in recent memory to a close. Many within the establishment were relieved by the choice, not only because Bricker represented a strong affirmation of the party's conservative roots, but also because the nomination of the controversial Joe McCarthy, the self-appointed leader of the "Anti-Communits Crusade" in Congress, had been averted. In reality, McCarthy had played a larger role in Bricker's nomination than anyone was willing to acknowledge, stepping aside only after the Ohioan had agreed to select McCarthy's right-hand man, Congressman Richard Nixon of California, as his running mate.

As expected, President Eleanor Roosevelt was renominated without much trouble by the Populists and now faces the concerted opposition of the American Party as she takes to the campaign trail. While the two candidates have clashed over domestic policy, with Bricker calling for the repeal of Roosevelt's National Health Service Act and and passage of a "Right-to-Work" Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the primary theme of the campaign has been foreign policy, and more specifically the war against Communism. While Bricker has accused Roosevelt of "loosing China" to the Red Menace and argued that stronger action is needed to stem the Communist tide at home, Roosevelt has argued that close cooperation with the League of Nations is the surest way to keep the peace and protect American interests abroad. Vice President Truman, meanwhile, had unsparingly laid into the opposition, whose accusations he dismisses as "plain hokum".

The choice is yours. Try not to destroy the country.

Bricker/Nixon, I'll destroy the country if I feel like it Tongue
Logged
Anti-Bothsidesism
Somenamelessfool
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 718
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2015, 08:29:11 PM »

Bricker/Nixon, I'll destroy the country if I feel like it Tongue
Then I may as well keep it entertaining.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,670
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2015, 08:48:41 PM »

Bricker/Nixon, to fight the Red Menace!
Logged
Illuminati Blood Drinker
phwezer
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,528
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.42, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2015, 09:50:57 PM »

Roosevelt. C'mon, guys.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,193
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2015, 10:26:46 PM »

Truman's freaking awesome, so let's keep him on as veep
Logged
SATW
SunriseAroundTheWorld
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,463
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 25, 2015, 10:29:51 PM »

Bricker/Nixon
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,152
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2015, 04:10:04 AM »

Roosevelt (sane)
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 26, 2015, 01:00:34 PM »

I'm cool with universal healthcare, so Roosevelt.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,538
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 26, 2015, 03:17:04 PM »

Roosevelt/Truman
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 27, 2015, 12:05:27 AM »

Are we really going to elect some random no-name from Ohio and Richard Nixon just for the sake of change in this timeline?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,152
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 27, 2015, 03:51:38 AM »

Yeah, this is dumb.
Logged
Wake Me Up When The Hard Border Ends
Anton Kreitzer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,167
Australia


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: 3.11

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 27, 2015, 05:31:30 AM »

Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 27, 2015, 12:49:21 PM »

Guys, the last two-term Populist was Sinclair. Change would be voting for ROOSEVELT.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 27, 2015, 02:37:32 PM »

Roosevelt is almost there, don't let me down Atlas!
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 27, 2015, 04:16:12 PM »

Are we really going to elect some random no-name from Ohio and Richard Nixon just for the sake of change in this timeline?

Why do you call him a "no-name"?
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 27, 2015, 04:39:44 PM »

Are we really going to elect some random no-name from Ohio and Richard Nixon just for the sake of change in this timeline?

Why do you call him a "no-name"?

He's not very notable, and doesn't seem to have done anything interesting in real-life. And we're just repeating the Nixon as VP thing if we elect this ticket.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,193
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 27, 2015, 06:02:12 PM »

Eh, now we have a chance at Hubert Humphrey or J. William Fullbright or Estes Kefauver (btw, HE should've been the counter, not Gore) to oppose Bricker in '56, and let's face it all three of them are probably gonna be just as progressive and easily more fascinating than AER
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,322
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 27, 2015, 08:49:28 PM »

Are we really going to elect some random no-name from Ohio and Richard Nixon just for the sake of change in this timeline?

That was the general idea, yes.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: June 27, 2015, 08:51:42 PM »

Are we really going to elect some random no-name from Ohio and Richard Nixon just for the sake of change in this timeline?

Why do you call him a "no-name"?

He's not very notable, and doesn't seem to have done anything interesting in real-life. And we're just repeating the Nixon as VP thing if we elect this ticket.

Prior to his defeat in the 1958 Ohio Senate Election, he was seen as a conservative stalwart and might have been at the forefront of 1960's conservatism instead of Goldwater. With Bricker down, that's when the right really turned to GoldyBarr.
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: June 27, 2015, 09:59:31 PM »

1952 Presidential Election

Fmr. Governor John W. Bricker (American-Ohio)/ Congressman Richard Nixon (American-California): 300 Electoral Votes; 53.3% popular votes
President Eleanor Roosevelt (People's-New York)/ Vice President Harry S Truman (People's-Missouri): 231 Electoral Votes; 46.7% popular votes

Despite her success in enacting the majority of her legislative agenda, allegations of Communist sympathies, the fall of China, and the ongoing stalemate in Korea would cause President Roosevelt to go down to defeat in 1952, the second time the New York Populist had lost a bid for reelection. Roosevelt's vanquisher, former Ohio Governor John Bricker, would thus return the American Party to power only four years after the collapse of Robert Taft's presidential bid. Bricker's tenuous victory would prove insufficient to overcome the Populists' advantage at the Congressional level, however, resulting in the first split government since 1934.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,193
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: June 27, 2015, 10:10:52 PM »

Dag nabbit!
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: June 27, 2015, 11:17:42 PM »

ಠ_ಠ
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: June 28, 2015, 01:49:56 AM »

Well, a split government is okay in this case. Better than Republican/American Party control of everything.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 13 queries.