Supreme Court Issues Ruling On Same Sex Marriage Legalizing Marriage Nat.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 02:48:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Supreme Court Issues Ruling On Same Sex Marriage Legalizing Marriage Nat.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
Author Topic: Supreme Court Issues Ruling On Same Sex Marriage Legalizing Marriage Nat.  (Read 8768 times)
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,838
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: June 26, 2015, 02:47:37 PM »

JCl is just being a bitter old fool.

I'm surprised about Carson, and more so about Walker
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 26, 2015, 02:50:31 PM »


There was none. Officiating a gay marriage were it is legal is not a conflict of interest.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 26, 2015, 02:57:14 PM »

This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

But that's not what the verdict was.
Logged
CapoteMonster
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 487
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.49, S: -2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 26, 2015, 03:08:28 PM »

I think Santorum has gone into a permanent depression.

If he's smart to his own mental health, he'll simply call in sick today and stop campaigning forever. Tongue

Ricky's going ham. https://mobile.twitter.com/RickSantorum
Logged
Obama-Biden Democrat
Zyzz
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: June 26, 2015, 04:48:25 PM »

I would imagine Conservative backlash was equally severe in 1968 against Loving v Virginia and in 1954 against Brown v Board.

America rightly mocks opposition to school desegregation and supporting inter racial marriage bans. I suspect history will also paint Conservatives today in a bad light.
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,137
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: June 26, 2015, 04:54:18 PM »


If you're referring to backlash … Well, if the Republicans think only the voting-age groups of 45-64 and 65-plus will be voting for U.S. president in 2016 (and, say, the next two election cycles) … they can go ahead with that and see how it works out for them.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: June 26, 2015, 04:56:02 PM »

This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

In that case the vote is 1-0 in favor of marriage equality as everyone besides Kagan has had a heterosexual marriage, creating a conflict of interest.
Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,137
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: June 26, 2015, 05:48:55 PM »

This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

Incorrect.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: June 26, 2015, 07:34:37 PM »

k

Anyway, it's definitely going to become an issue in the campaign in that candidates will have to pledge to nominate only those that will strike down gay marriage and Obamacare. Of course, the vast majority of those people are impossible to confirm, but the base won't care.

Both losing propositions for 2016.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,710
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: June 26, 2015, 08:51:46 PM »

Ted Cruz, master of understatement, gave his reaction to the ruling. First line says it all:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g910kbquh3U
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: June 26, 2015, 09:08:41 PM »

I think Santorum has gone into a permanent depression.

If he's smart to his own mental health, he'll simply call in sick today and stop campaigning forever. Tongue

Ricky's going ham. https://mobile.twitter.com/RickSantorum
That is beautiful.
Ted Cruz, master of understatement, gave his reaction to the ruling. First line says it all:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g910kbquh3U
Classic.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: June 26, 2015, 10:54:25 PM »

This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

Incorrect.

Absolutely correct.

 
This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

In that case the vote is 1-0 in favor of marriage equality as everyone besides Kagan has had a heterosexual marriage, creating a conflict of interest.


Nope. It's 4-3 Kagan and Ginsberg performed gay weddings. Marriage equality is one man one woman. You and the pro-SSM crowd advocate the destruction of religious liberty which must be preserved.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,708


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: June 26, 2015, 10:56:56 PM »

This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

Incorrect.

Absolutely correct.

 
This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

In that case the vote is 1-0 in favor of marriage equality as everyone besides Kagan has had a heterosexual marriage, creating a conflict of interest.


Nope. It's 4-3 Kagan and Ginsberg performed gay weddings. Marriage equality is one man one woman. You and the pro-SSM crowd advocate the destruction of religious liberty which must be preserved.

Actually it's 7-2 because Thomas and Scalia should have recused themselves from Bush v. Gore, so Bush shouldn't have become President, and Alito and Roberts' seats should belong to more liberal justices.
Logged
WVdemocrat
DimpledChad
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 954
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: June 26, 2015, 10:58:08 PM »

This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

Incorrect.

Absolutely correct.

 
This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

In that case the vote is 1-0 in favor of marriage equality as everyone besides Kagan has had a heterosexual marriage, creating a conflict of interest.


Nope. It's 4-3 Kagan and Ginsberg performed gay weddings. Marriage equality is one man one woman. You and the pro-SSM crowd advocate the destruction of religious liberty which must be preserved.

I don't care what you think.

We won, you lost. That's all that matters to me. Go cry about it.
Logged
Peeperkorn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,987
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 0.65, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: June 26, 2015, 11:07:36 PM »

You and the pro-SSM crowd advocate the destruction of religious liberty which must be preserved.

Is this a joke?
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,397
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: June 26, 2015, 11:10:39 PM »

This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

Incorrect.

Absolutely correct.

 
This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

In that case the vote is 1-0 in favor of marriage equality as everyone besides Kagan has had a heterosexual marriage, creating a conflict of interest.


Nope. It's 4-3 Kagan and Ginsberg performed gay weddings. Marriage equality is one man one woman. You and the pro-SSM crowd advocate the destruction of religious liberty which must be preserved.

No it's 9-0 because all 9 of them should have voted for equality.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: June 26, 2015, 11:54:45 PM »

This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

Incorrect.

Absolutely correct.

 
This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

In that case the vote is 1-0 in favor of marriage equality as everyone besides Kagan has had a heterosexual marriage, creating a conflict of interest.


Nope. It's 4-3 Kagan and Ginsberg performed gay weddings. Marriage equality is one man one woman. You and the pro-SSM crowd advocate the destruction of religious liberty which must be preserved.

I don't care what you think.

We won, you lost. That's all that matters to me. Go cry about it.

You haven't won yet. This case can still be reconsidered and congress can also still act.
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,868
Argentina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: June 26, 2015, 11:59:13 PM »

No it's 9-0 because all 9 of them should have voted for equality.

It's actually 36 - 3,14159265359 because in my mind there are that many judges and they all come from the planet Solaris and their names are all variations of Art Garfunkel.

Makes as much sense as JLC

Anyway, good decision, and glad to see one of the biggest countries on earth finally get marriage equality, congrats Wink

By the way, in less than a month it will be the 5th anniversary of gay marriage legalization in Argentina and so far straight marriage and freedom of religion still exist and there have been no public demonstrations for congress to legalize bestiality or baby rape so paranoid conservatives should probably chill out a little.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,708


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: June 27, 2015, 02:41:13 AM »

This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

Incorrect.

Absolutely correct.

 
This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

In that case the vote is 1-0 in favor of marriage equality as everyone besides Kagan has had a heterosexual marriage, creating a conflict of interest.


Nope. It's 4-3 Kagan and Ginsberg performed gay weddings. Marriage equality is one man one woman. You and the pro-SSM crowd advocate the destruction of religious liberty which must be preserved.

Everyone who had personally been married should have recused themselves, and the quorom rules suspended, so that Kagan could issued a 1-0 ruling.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: June 27, 2015, 03:03:59 AM »

You and the pro-SSM crowd advocate the destruction of religious liberty which must be preserved.

Is this a joke?

if by "this" you mean jcl, then yes.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,838
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: June 27, 2015, 03:33:14 AM »

Does JCL know he's the reason why everyone loves same sex marriage?
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,206
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: June 27, 2015, 04:25:38 AM »

This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

Logged
Penelope
Scifiguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: June 27, 2015, 07:20:03 AM »

This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

Incorrect.

Absolutely correct.

 
This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

In that case the vote is 1-0 in favor of marriage equality as everyone besides Kagan has had a heterosexual marriage, creating a conflict of interest.


Nope. It's 4-3 Kagan and Ginsberg performed gay weddings. Marriage equality is one man one woman. You and the pro-SSM crowd advocate the destruction of religious liberty which must be preserved.

I don't care what you think.

We won, you lost. That's all that matters to me. Go cry about it.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: June 27, 2015, 08:00:34 AM »

This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

Incorrect.

Absolutely correct.

 
This issue is not settled. 4-3 Traditional marriage wins because the advocates of marriage supremacy (gay marriage) have no honor in recusing over conflict of interest.

In that case the vote is 1-0 in favor of marriage equality as everyone besides Kagan has had a heterosexual marriage, creating a conflict of interest.


Nope. It's 4-3 Kagan and Ginsberg performed gay weddings. Marriage equality is one man one woman. You and the pro-SSM crowd advocate the destruction of religious liberty which must be preserved.

I don't care what you think.

We won, you lost. That's all that matters to me. Go cry about it.

You haven't won yet. This case can still be reconsidered and congress can also still act.

Stare decisis prevails. For the next year and a half, the President has a veto and will use it against some Congressional measure to make 'protection of traditional marriage' even a state option. Should a Democrat be elected President then the veto remains.

The anti-SSM cause will depend upon a cultural shift as profound as the 'born-again' movement of the 1970s that led to the 'conservative' trend of the 1980s. Don't count on any such cultural shift.  What you consider the Left in America isn't outrageous enough to prompt a secession from within. Add to that, demographic trends do not favor the Hard Right. America is becoming less white, less Christian, more secular, and less reactionary.

America is growing up about homosexuality. Homosexuals now say that they want children and that they want to keep the filthy hands of perverts off their children and are with the majority.  I will be delighted to insist that gays and lesbians make their words true.
Logged
Cryptic
Shadowlord88
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 891


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: June 27, 2015, 11:34:47 AM »

The irony is if the JCL's of the country hadn't politicized the issue back in the 90's, we probably wouldn't have SSM nationwide today.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.071 seconds with 13 queries.