The ultimate irony is the folks who overturned the law and years of precedent in Citizens United are the same ones who are accusing the Majority in Obergefell of legislating from the bench. Which one is it?
Anyway, I support strengthening the institution of marriage instead of fighting a horrible fight dismissive of the happiness of an entire group of people that just want to be happy. If it takes an activist Supreme Court to reach that end, then why not?
Though, I do agree that we need elections for judges, though for completely different reasons.
Both groups are legislating from the bench.
