Taking a break.

[Torie]

CCSF.

If he's resorted to harassing posters via PM, that definitely is grounds for banning.

Nope. Unless he makes a sock account, the moderators here don't give a shit.

Really?

[Torie]

CCSF.

If he's resorted to harassing posters via PM, that definitely is grounds for banning.

Nope. Unless he makes a sock account, the moderators here don't give a shit.

Whereas mods on AAD don't give a $hit, period. Or I forget: Are we wantonly banning too many people, or cravenly not banning enough? It's tough remembering which you are arguing on any given day.

And ftr, be a tad more judicious (i.e. accurate) in use of the all-encompassing terms "mods".

(Which reminds me, I have a banning petition to sign in another thread.....)

The point of AAD is that it is supposed to be lassiez-faire outside of significant personal attacks. That being said, they'd ban CCSF right away if he tried to sign up there.

Actually he is there. And I think that is a good thing.

[Torie]

I must say, that Badger must be an awesome prosecutor. My best advice to criminals, is get the F out of Badger's county. When he wants to bag you in court, he will be merciless!