Taking a break.

[Badger]

CCSF.

If he's resorted to harassing posters via PM, that definitely is grounds for banning.

Nope. Unless he makes a sock account, the moderators here don't give a shit.

Whereas mods on AAD don't give a $hit, period. Or I forget: Are we wantonly banning too many people, or cravenly not banning enough? It's tough remembering which you are arguing on any given day.

And ftr, be a tad more judicious (i.e. accurate) in use of the all-encompassing terms "mods".

(Which reminds me, I have a banning petition to sign in another thread.....)

[Badger]

CCSF.

If he's resorted to harassing posters via PM, that definitely is grounds for banning.

Nope. Unless he makes a sock account, the moderators here don't give a shit.

Whereas mods on AAD don't give a $hit, period. Or I forget: Are we wantonly banning too many people, or cravenly not banning enough? It's tough remembering which you are arguing on any given day.

And ftr, be a tad more judicious (i.e. accurate) in use of the all-encompassing terms "mods".

(Which reminds me, I have a banning petition to sign in another thread.....)

The point of AAD is that it is supposed to be lassiez-faire outside of significant personal attacks. That being said, they'd ban CCSF right away if he tried to sign up there.

no, ccsf has in fact been gracing us at aad with his posts for almost a week now and there's no movement to ban him.

True, the AAD mods are only campaigning for him to be banned here. dfuq?

I'd say "Good, keep him", but I'll have to put up with him there now.