Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2013, 11:13:00 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Congressional Elections (Moderator: Joe Republic)
| | |-+  A guide to all the seante races in 06.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] Print
Author Topic: A guide to all the seante races in 06.  (Read 6504 times)
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3708


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

View Profile
« Reply #75 on: May 05, 2005, 05:54:53 pm »
Ignore

Quote
All I'm saying is that Rendell was always the favorite to win the Governorship in 2002. 

No he wasn't. Some polls showed Casey up about 15 points.

Just because someone is up in the polls at some point doesn't make them to favorite to win. 

Casey was leading the polls by double digits before Rendell started his ad campaign, but this was completely based on name recognition.  Everyone working on that race knew his support was extremely shallow.   Rendell had the charisma, the experience, the agenda, and the money to win that race.  The only thing he didn't have was name recognition.

Polls a year before that election don't show any of that...they only show name recognition.  As soon as Rendell started running his ads, he went up by 10 points and never looked back.  And this was exactly what everyone in the campaign knew would happen.

He was up most of the time. Casey had everything except the personality. That race was Casey's. Rendell was certainly not the favorite throughout the campaign.

What do you mean by most of the time?  Rendell jumped into the lead as soon as he started his ad campaign, and stayed there for the rest of the campaign.  I spent months of my life doing Rendell's polling and I remember this moment well.  Casey's lead fell apart within days...he never really had a chance.

Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 49406


View Profile
« Reply #76 on: May 05, 2005, 06:10:44 pm »
Ignore

Quote
All I'm saying is that Rendell was always the favorite to win the Governorship in 2002. 

No he wasn't. Some polls showed Casey up about 15 points.

Just because someone is up in the polls at some point doesn't make them to favorite to win. 

Casey was leading the polls by double digits before Rendell started his ad campaign, but this was completely based on name recognition.  Everyone working on that race knew his support was extremely shallow.   Rendell had the charisma, the experience, the agenda, and the money to win that race.  The only thing he didn't have was name recognition.

Polls a year before that election don't show any of that...they only show name recognition.  As soon as Rendell started running his ads, he went up by 10 points and never looked back.  And this was exactly what everyone in the campaign knew would happen.

He was up most of the time. Casey had everything except the personality. That race was Casey's. Rendell was certainly not the favorite throughout the campaign.

What do you mean by most of the time?  Rendell jumped into the lead as soon as he started his ad campaign, and stayed there for the rest of the campaign.  I spent months of my life doing Rendell's polling and I remember this moment well.  Casey's lead fell apart within days...he never really had a chance.



It was only in the final couple of weeks when it got close. You claimed Rendell was always the favorite and that's in no way true.
Logged



And you're a fucking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
J. J.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31872
United States


View Profile
« Reply #77 on: May 06, 2005, 10:44:47 am »
Ignore

Phil's recollection is mine.

I will make one prediction about the 2006 PA Senate race:

If you are expecting a "Casey Cakewalk," you are dead wrong.
Logged

J. J.

"Actually, .. now that you mention it...." 
- Londo Molari

"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke

"Wa sala, wa lala."

(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 49406


View Profile
« Reply #78 on: May 06, 2005, 12:57:34 pm »
Ignore


If you are expecting a "Casey Cakewalk," you are dead wrong.

I don't expect him to win by more than six points. A six point win would be comfortable but, I agree that it will not be a cakewalk.
Logged



And you're a fucking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Senator X
jdb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6086
United States


View Profile
« Reply #79 on: May 06, 2005, 05:02:07 pm »
Ignore

Mendenez, Pallone, and Andrews would beat Kean (Mendenez and Pallone by 2-5%).  Keystone Phil, if you must humiliate your self, fine. 
Logged

Cool Grin Tongue Smiley Sad Huh Angry Wink Roll Eyes Undecided Cheesy
Shocked Lips sealed

Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 49406


View Profile
« Reply #80 on: May 06, 2005, 05:04:07 pm »
Ignore

Mendenez, Pallone, and Andrews would beat Kean (Mendenez and Pallone by 2-5%).  Keystone Phil, if you must humiliate your self, fine. 

Andrews could beat Kean. Menendez and Pallone - No.
Logged



And you're a fucking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
RomneyGekko Situation Hairgel
Flyers2004
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10508


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.87

View Profile
« Reply #81 on: May 06, 2005, 07:30:51 pm »
Ignore

Mendenez, Pallone, and Andrews would beat Kean (Mendenez and Pallone by 2-5%).  Keystone Phil, if you must humiliate your self, fine. 

Andrews could beat Kean. Menendez and Pallone - No.

Not so sure about Pallone.  I wouldn't count out Menendez either.
Logged


DOUCHEBAGGERY AT ITS FINEST!
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory