Post random maps here
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 10:53:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Post random maps here
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 177 178 179 180 181 [182] 183 184 185 186 187 ... 238
Author Topic: Post random maps here  (Read 980582 times)
badgate
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,466


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4525 on: March 11, 2015, 02:57:37 AM »

1960 thru 1988, the crazy years




Texas Senator Lyndon B. Johnson / Minnesota Senator Hubert H. Humphrey - 273; 51% (30,707,480)
Vice President Richard Nixon / Henry Cabot Lodge, Jr. - 264; 49% (29,844,384)


Nixon almost won this one...New York was very narrow and called near 4 or 5 am. The margin of victory was (D: 3,162,366 to R: 3,123,326)

____________________________




President Lyndon B. Johnson / Vice President Hubert H. Humphrey - 422; 53% (37,546,796)
Massachusetts Senator John F. Kennedy / Utah - 116; 46% (32,546,244)


A Republican JFK was probably the best candidate to go up against President Johnson in '64.

____________________________




Hubert H. Humphrey / Georgia - 384; 46% (26,928,496)
Barry Goldwater / Pennsylvania - 154; 38% (22,582,810)
Richard Nixon / California - 0; 16% (9,052,127)


After Goldwater gets the nomination, Nixon jumps in the race, arguing for a "sensible Republican option." The narrative of his campaign is that he is running to save the nation, and he does: by splitting the vote and helping Hubert H. Humphrey win.

____________________________




President Hubert H. Humphrey / Georgia - 523; 60% (42,945,828)
New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller / Mississippi - 15; 40% (29,000,720)


I think it's almost impossible for the incumbent to lose in 1972 with historical conditions.

____________________________




New York Senator Robert F. Kennedy / Texas - 107; 49% (42,242,204)
California Governor Ronald Reagan / Illinois - 431; 51% (44,556,360)


One of my favorite maps so far!

____________________________




Colorado Senator Gary Hart / California - 367; 49% (42,146,332)
President Ronal Reagan / Vice President Illinois - 171; 43% (36,940,392)
John Anderson / Wisconsin - 0; 8% (6,879,446)


____________________________



President Gary Hart / Vice President California - 443; 55% (48,676,628)
Michigan Governor Gerald Ford / Ohio - 95; 45% (39,675,320)


____________________________




Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis / Tennessee - 319; 50% (47,549,764)
New York Rep. Jack Kemp / Wisconsin - 219; 49% (46,352,964)
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4526 on: March 12, 2015, 04:33:36 PM »

1948

Governor Thomas Dewey/ Governor Earl Warren (Republican): 356 EV; 54% PV
President James Byrnes/ Senator Harry S Truman (Democratic): 175 EV; 31% PV
Fmr. Vice President Henry Wallace/ Senator Glen Taylor (Progressive): 0 EV; 15% PV
Logged
Goodwin
Goodwin45
Rookie
**
Posts: 188
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4527 on: March 14, 2015, 09:50:59 AM »

1968


Senator Robert F. Kennedy (NY)/Senator Ralph Yarborough (TX) 278 (44.4%)
Governor Nelson Rockefeller (NY)/Senator Charles H. Percy (IL) 183 (40.7%)
Governor George Wallace (AL)/General Curtis LeMay (CA) 77 (14.1%)

1972


President Robert F. Kennedy (NY)/VP Ralph Yarborough (TX) 337 (47.0%)
George Wallace (AL)/Curtis LeMay (CA) 101 (17.2%)
Governor George Romney (MI)/Governor Spiro Agnew (MD) 100 (35.1%)
Logged
VPH
vivaportugalhabs
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,682
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4528 on: March 14, 2015, 11:59:56 PM »


Strong Colin Powell '96 campaign.
Logged
badgate
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,466


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4529 on: March 16, 2015, 10:04:41 PM »

1960-1980





Minnesota Senator Hubert H. Humphrey / Massachusetts Senator John F. Kennedy - 159; 49% (27,093,662)
New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller / California Senator Richard Nixon - 378; 51% (28,424,440)




New York Senator Robert F. Kennedy / Ralph Yarborough - 483; 56% (34,922,908)
President Nelson Rockefeller / Vice President Richard Nixon - 55; 44% (27,336,056)





President Robert F. Kennedy / Vice President Ralph Yarborough - 171; 45% (30,208,208)
Frmr. Vice President Richard Nixon / Maryland Governor Spiro Agnew - 357; 47% (31,574,492)
Alabama Governor George Wallace / Curtis LeMay - 10; 8% (5,270,657)





South Carolina Senator Fritz Hollings / Washington Senator Scoop Jackson - 3; 41% (30,504,668)
President Richard Nixon / Vice President Spiro Agnew - 535; 59% (44,413,780)





Minnesota Senator Eugene McCarthy / Georgia Governor James Carter - 268; 50% (43,725,600)
West Virginia Senator Jay Rockefeller / Forgot - 270; 50% (43,305,160)

I figured since Rocky became President in 1960, Jay decided to stick with the GOP to take advantage of the family name.



Georgia Governor James Carter / Minnesota Senator Walter Mondale - 314; 51% (44,367,776)
President Jay Rockefeller / Ohio - 224; 49% (42,837,056)


ALTERNATE 1980



Deleware Senator Joe Biden / Minnesota Senator Walter Mondale - 519; 50% (33,978,512)
President Jay Rockefeller / Ohio - 19; 33% (30,146,140)
Illinois Person Anderson / Wisconsin - 0; 17% (15,224,815)
Logged
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,896
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4530 on: March 16, 2015, 10:53:32 PM »
« Edited: March 16, 2015, 11:15:24 PM by Pessimistic Antineutrino »

1976
Strange Man Runs Single State Campaign, Somehow Succeeds. Also Ford Reelected



Governor James Carter (D-GA)/Senator Walter Mondale (D-MN) 64 electoral votes, 38% (30,308,798) of the popular vote
President Gerald Ford (R-MI)/Senator Robert Dole (R-KS) 466 electoral votes, 43% (34,266,264) of the popular vote
Iowa Man (I-IA)/Some Dude (I-IA) 8 electoral votes, 18% (14,496,500) of the popular vote

1980
No One Is Quite Sure What To Think



The Guy (D-ME)/Frmr. Representative Some Dude (D-NJ) 161 electoral votes, 47% (47,952,984) of the popular vote
Governor Iowa Man (R-IA)/Representative Some Dude (R-IA) 377 electoral votes, 52% (52,320,672) of the popular vote
Frmr. President John F. Kennedy (I-MA)/Some Dude (I-NM) 0 electoral votes, 1% (694,347) of the popular vote
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4531 on: March 19, 2015, 10:49:54 PM »

2004 - Feingold rides the wave


Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI)/Senator Joe Biden (D-DE) - 54.1%, 395 EV's
Vice President Max Baucus (R-MT)/Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN) - 45.5%, 143 EV's

2008 - Moderate Crist defeats Carter-esqe Feingold


Senator Charlie Crist (R-FL)/Former Governor George Allen (R-VA) - 52.3%, 328 EV's
President Russ Feingold (D-WI)/Vice President Joe Biden (D-DE) - 46.2%, 210 EV's


2012 - Ohio Recount Machine!


Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)/Senator Harold Ford (D-TN) - 49.3%, 290 EV's
Vice President George Allen (R-VA)/Former Governor Mitt Romney (R-UT) - 49.6%, 248 EV's

2016 - Macaca for President 2016


President Amy Klobucahr (D-MN)/Vice President Harold Ford (D-TN) - 55.6%, 401 EV's
Former Vice President George Allen (R-VA)/Congressman Rand Paul (R-TX) - 43.2%, 137 EV's
Logged
badgate
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,466


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4532 on: April 05, 2015, 06:54:41 PM »

1960 - 1988: The Darkest Timeline



Minnesota Senator Hubert Humphrey - 150; 48% (27,313,676)
Vice President Richard Nixon - 387; 52% (29,323,634)





West Virginia Senator Robert Byrd - 170; 47% (30,068,824)
President Richard Nixon - 368; 52% (33,033,500)





Texas Governor John Connally - 216; 43% (28,737,434)
Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater - 312; 43% (28,616,368)
Alabama Governor George Wallace - 10; 14% (9,402,252)





Minnesota Senator Eugene McCarthy - 31; 44% (30,981,440)
President Barry Goldwater - 507; 55% (38,684,624)





Georgia Governor James Carter - 350; 50% (39,596,456)
Texas Governor John Connally - 188; 50% (39,522,872)





President James Carter - 110; 47% (38,918,040)
Kansas Senator Robert Dole - 428; 53% (43,944,828)





NOTE: I was shocked by this result! My intention with this series was as many Republican administrations as possible. Plus, the historical conditions for 1984 usually provide a huge advantage for the incumbent. Mario Cuomo must have some special 1984 sauce.
New York Governor Mario Cuomo - 393; 52% (46,452,640)
President Robert Dole - 145; 47% (42,268,184)




President Mario Cuomo - 289; 50% (49,384,448)
Former Tennessee Senator Howard Baker - 249; 49% (48,628,360)
Logged
ChainsawJedis
Tj Hare
Rookie
**
Posts: 116


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4533 on: April 16, 2015, 02:50:08 AM »

In a shocking turn of events, Alaska, so offended at being left off of Marco Rubio's campaign logo, goes D for the first time in over 50 years. Alaska would have secured Rubio the nomination, instead the votes are left tied at 269/269, and it goes to house to determine the outcome for just the third time in our nations history.



EV:
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio - 269
Former Sec. of State Hillary Clinton - 269
Logged
beaver2.0
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,769


Political Matrix
E: -2.45, S: -0.52

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4534 on: April 16, 2015, 07:24:48 AM »

Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4535 on: April 27, 2015, 03:34:19 PM »
« Edited: April 27, 2015, 05:14:02 PM by maxwell »

2016 Primaries - The Cruzening
For most of the primary season, the frontrunners were Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker and Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush. Most voters were hesitant of the two, Walker for his poor ability to communicate and his constant fumbling and flip flops, and Bush due to the unpopularity of his brother and the hypocrisy of running a Bush against a Clinton. Walker led in Iowa and Bush led in New Hampshire and South Carolina, and it was pretty easy to see where things went from there.

But primary voters got tired quickly of their bickering. Waiting in the wings in strong places were Senators Ted Cruz and Rand Paul, Cruz from the arch-conservative wing and Paul taking a reformist tack for most of the campaign. Another person waiting in the wings was Ohio Governor John Kasich, an outspoken moderate who had a penchant for being too honest. And rather than the fumbling Walker taking his rightful win in Iowa, he fell in fourth place behind those three (he dropped out immediately following). Kasich, to the surprise of many, took first place in New Hampshire, with Rand Paul edging Jeb Bush for second. From there it was a battle between the three.

For a campaign between only three candidates, surprises kept happening. Despite many denouncing Rand Paul's ability with minorities, his successes during the campaign proved astounding. In the Michigan contest, which most held as an easy Kasich win, Paul managed to slide a surprise victory over the neighboring Governor due to a strong registration move with African Americans (though the same move didn't work in South Carolina). Paul also managed to make waves with hispanics, with a wild surprise win in California. But the biggest surprise of all was the Ted Cruz machine - over the years, the established, moderate candidate had won the Republican primary. But with the defeat of Jeb Bush, intraparty moderates were split between the reformer Rand Paul and John Kasich. Paul was too much of a wildcard, running hard against generic Republican foreign policy and being pro-pot and pro-justice reform, proved too risky for most, and Kasich's known outspokeness got him in trouble too many times. Meanwhile, Cruz all but sewed up Republican Conservatives, who quickly got over his disingenous speech pattern when they saw his opposition.

A twenty point win in Pennsylvania allowed Cruz to sail to victory in the Republican primary, which left him irreparably damaged in the general election.



Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) - 50%
Governor John Kasich (R-OH) - 26%
Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) - 19%

Cruz proved to be a savvy figure within the GOP, but in the general election, things proved tougher. Cruz trailed Secretary Clinton a hearty 17 points by the time the Republican Convention had reared its head. Cruz, not wanting to anger the moderate and more conventional wings of the party, searched desperately for a candidate who could unite the party. He decided to go with a slightly less known figure, a figure who won the state Rand Paul had surprised everyone in - Michigan Governor Rick Snyder. Snyder's pick was initially well-received - a technocratic Governor who provided balance to the ticket, but ultimately Snyder was more proof that Cruz wasn't even trying for the hispanic vote.

After the conventions, Cruz still trailed a shocking 15 points. However, the debates proved to be a huge boon for Cruz, who trounced Hillary Clinton over her scandals at the Clinton Foundation and her performance as Secretary of State. Nevertheless, worry over Cruz still had him trailing a solid 6-8 points. The VP debates, between Housing Secretary Julian Castro and Snyder, proved to be a success for Democrats, and Hillary managed to salvage what most considered an embarrassing first debate performance with two solid performances and a notable Cruz tactical error (rolling his eyes at Clinton's accusations of Cruz's Senate performance).

Clinton would go on to win a near-landslide victory over the controversial Senator Cruz, but narrowly missed the opportunity to flip the Senate (with Republicans holding it 51-49).



Former State Secretary Hillary Clinton (D-NY)/HUD Secretary Julian Castro (D-TX) - 53.2%, 363 EV's
Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX)/Governor Rick Snyder (R-MI) - 45.5%, 175 EV's
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4536 on: April 27, 2015, 05:01:47 PM »

2020 Primaries and Election - Every Idea Has Its Day
For all of the bickering over a controversial, scandalous, and bomb throwing Clinton administration, her Presidency proved rather uneventful. With Republicans controlling the House and Senate, Clinton proved even less willing to fight than Barack Obama did, passing a few bipartisan bills on the domestic side and failing to move the ball much anywhere. One major piece of legislation was in Education, which repealed No Child Left Behind and reformatted education in ways that benefitted charter schools in exchange for increases in school funding. There was also minor tax reform, which reduced the corporate rate while eliminating some of the subsidies offered.

Foreign affairs were more interesting, where Clinton dueled with both House and Senate Republicans and Putin, who treated Clinton as a woman out of her place. There were times when the country feared an all out war could begin, but Putin, as usual, was bluffing. The Iran deal finally came to a close after Clinton convinced some Senate Republicans, including the magically still there Senator Rand Paul, to bend on their opposition to some parts of the deal. The middle east was still in turmoil and Clinton's missions in the region had failed in their goal of bringing stabilization to the region.

Clinton, frustrated with the trugid pace of Washington, decided not to go for a second term after all. This left her Vice President, Julian Castro, to run for the office. Democrats, however, did not want a coronation for the rather inexperienced Vice President. Most thought the aging Elizabeth Warren would go for it, but she did not. Some thought Senator Kamala Harris, a rising star in the party, would go for it, but she did not. The main contender for the nomination was Michigan Senator Gary Peters, a man considered gravely competent but rather unremarkable. Castro began his journey with a strong lead, but Peters chipped away at it by advertising to working class Democrats who were gravely tired of Democratic leaders avoiding them. Peters managed to edge Castro in Iowa, a huge surprise, which forced the Clinton operation to battle in Castro's favor. Castro and Peters battled it out til the very end, with Castro struggling to balance being youthful change while at the same time being in the hands of the administration. Nevertheless, Peters could never make it out of being poorly funded in comparison, and Castro won the nomination.

Democratic Nomination Map



Vice President Julian Castro (D-TX) - 52%
Senator Gary Peters (D-MI) - 48%

Meanwhile Republicans, excited due to their large gains, were even more ecstatic upon news of Clinton's retirement. The inexperienced Castro or the workman-like Peters gave them an opportunity to win the Presidency after twelve years of exile. The problem still existed - the Republican Party needed to win minority voters. Republicans desperately tried to get a run out of Senator Cory Gardner, who had sky high approval ratings in his home state of Colorado, a state essential to GOP victory, but Gardner refused. This left the party scrambling with also-rans - VP Nominee and Former Michigan Governor Rick Snyder looked like a frontrunner until he abandoned the possibility of a run. The wisest choice of Party moderates seemed to be Utah Senator Josh Romney, who gleefully jumped into a run. Romney would face tons of familiar faces - Former Nominee and Former Senator Ted Cruz, Former Governor Scott Walker, Former Senator Marco Rubio, but none really shined. Romney did, however, have one really strong bit of opposition - Senator Rand Paul. Paul's stronger than expected performance in 2016 had allowed him to win his seat easily (60-38 against Adam Edelen), and Paul had become a renowned voice for fiscal reform, criminal justice, and foreign policy. It was like a battle of the giants, with midgets nipping at the heels.

The only surprise third contestant on this ride for the Republican nomination was none other than the controversial Former Governor of Indiana Mike Pence (who lost re-election to Glenda Ritz due to Clinton coat-tails). Religious conservatives, furious at the choices presented to them, resurrected Pence to a shock victory in the state of Iowa. Pence really had no staying power though - his loss in a state as conservative as Indiana proved fatal, as were his debate performances after his win - and he wasn't considered much of a serious candidate.

Josh Romney had more money than anyone could handle, and support from the Republican establishment unlike most had ever seen. But Romney, however, needed every bit he could get and then some. He was even more robotic, lethargic, and downright awkward than his father had been. Romney positions were almost completely secret, as if he was only going to let them out during the general election. This frustrated grassroots voters beyond belief, and led to Rand Paul's important victory in, once again, Michigan.

Paul had learned from his mistakes in 2016 - he toned down his rhetoric on foreign policy, but amped up his message of an inclusive GOP that fought for civil rights. Paul's awkwardness with the press remained but was far improved, and Paul's early weaknesses became strengths - his strange stands on the issues proved to have much leeway with a GOP tired of losing elections with squishy moderates, and Paul managed to edge out the robotic Romney and the laughing stock Pence.



Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) - 52%
Senator Josh Romney (R-UT) - 42%
Former Governor Mike Pence (R-IN) - 4%

Republican voters remained hesitant of Paul, some hawks even threatened leaving the party. Democratic nominee Castro attempted to use this to his advantage, aiming at a sect of voters Democrats hadn't really had the ability to contest - military hawks. Castro ran a campaign of life or death in the middle east, contesting that military action in the region would be the best final solution to the problems there. Clinton had attempted something similar but with a lighter, diplomatic touch and had failed, and Castro introduced going all the way. Paul, for all of his ideological figuring, held firm, which resulted in some notable Republican Senators falling behind Castro (John McCain, Lindsey Graham).

Paul did attempt to fix his issues with the hawks and the more traditionalist wing of the Party. In his Vice President, he went for a battle-tested hawk who more represented the business wing of the party - Senator Rob Portman of Ohio. Portman had everything Paul could want - someone who could hold on to white voters, a strong fiscal conservative compliment, and a generic hawk who could keep the hawks at bay. Castro, meanwhile, attempted this third way with some caution. He did need to keep the liberal wing of the party happy, who had begun to be pretty outraged over Castro's strong shift. He went with the elder of Wisconsin - Senator Russ Feingold.

Castro and Paul were neck and neck the entire campaign, both aiming beyond their parties traditional sphere of voters. Paul spoke in places like Detriot, Los Anegeles, places were Republicans are normally shunned, and received wild applause for his speeches on poverty. Castro went to military bases, veteran affairs offices, fighting for accountable government and a strong national defense. On fiscal issues they held on to their beliefs, Paul a very strong fiscal conservative and Castro a Clintonite technoliberal. But both attempted to reinvent Presidential politics.

Paul narrowly won the first debate, which seemed to be a newly Republican tradition, while Castro won the second two and Portman beat Feingold in the VP debate. Nothing too eventful happened, with the exception of a bored Castro nearly nodding off at one point in the first debate in Colorado. Despite the strong and heated campaign, Castro and Paul remained fairly cordial with one another.

Despite a strong effort from Vice President Julian Castro, he could not escape the mediocre President Hillary Clinton, and Rand Paul took the Presidency as the first Republican to do so since George W. Bush in 2000. Castro took a stronger than expected portion of the White Vote, but Paul took a much stronger than expected performance with African Americans and Hispanics.



Senator Rand Paul (R-KY)/Senator Rob Portman (R-OH) - 50.0%, 279 EV's
Vice President Julian Castro (D-TX)/Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) - 48.5%, 259 EV's
Logged
DKrol
dkrolga
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,542


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4537 on: April 28, 2015, 06:50:18 PM »



√ Hoodie Allen (R-NY)/Bruce Jenner (R-CA) - 380
Waka Floka Flame (D-GA)/Alec Baldwin (D-NY) - 158
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4538 on: May 01, 2015, 07:59:59 PM »

1980 - Ford beats back the man he defeated


Former President Gerald Ford (R-MI)/RNC Chairman Bill Brock (R-TN) - 54.4%, 479 EV's
President Jimmy Carter (D-GA)/Vice President Walter Mondale (D-MN) - 44.6%, 59 EV's

1984 - Hart beats back Brock



Senator Gary Hart (D-CO)/Senator Dale Bumpers (D-AR) - 50.6%, 282 EV's

Vice President Bill Brock (R-TN)/Senator Paul Laxalt (R-NV) - 48.3%, 256 EV's

1988 - Bumpers wins uphill battle



Vice President Dale Bumpers (D-AR)/Former Governor Bob Graham (D-FL) - 49.3%, 298 EV's
Governor George Deukemejian (R-CA)/Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld (R-IL) - 49.2%, 240 EV's
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4539 on: May 03, 2015, 03:56:34 PM »



Try to guess the significance of this map... note the differing percentages.
Logged
MadmanMotley
Bmotley
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,340
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.29, S: -5.91

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4540 on: May 04, 2015, 12:47:18 AM »

In an alternate timeline, Lee Iaccoca decides to run as an independent in 1988, which causes both him and Libertarian party nominee Ron Paul to be allowed in the debates. This led to a different selection of running mates on all sides, and a much more interesting map.


Gov. Michael Dukakis (D-MA)/Sen. Al Gore Jr. (D-TN) 149EV
VP. George HW. Bush (R-TX)/George Deukmejian (R-CA) 160EV
CEO Lee Iaccoca (I-MI)/Bob Casey (I-PA) 158EV
Rep. Ron Paul (L-TX)/Mr. Pat Buchanan (L-VA) 71EV
Logged
JonathanSwift
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,122
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4541 on: May 04, 2015, 12:56:39 AM »



Try to guess the significance of this map... note the differing percentages.

The largest states by area are the most Republican, and the smallest are the most Democratic.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4542 on: May 04, 2015, 07:36:30 AM »


Fmr. Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY)/Fmr. Gov. Martin O'Malley (D-MD): 443 EVs (57% PV)
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)/Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI): 95 EVs (40%) PV
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4543 on: May 07, 2015, 11:42:34 AM »

2000 - Senator Steve Ford defeats John Kerry for a third term of Republicans



Senator Steve Ford (R-MI)/Former Education Secretary Lamar Alexander (R-TN) - 48.7%, 283 EV's
Senator John Kerry (D-MA)/Speaker Dick Gephardt (D-MO) - 48.3%, 255 EV's

2004 - President Ford wins decisive re-match



President Steve Ford (R-MI)/Vice President Lamar Alexander (R-TN) - 51.1%, 313 EV's
Senator John Kerry (D-MA)/Senator John Edwards (D-NC) - 47.2%, 225 EV's

2008 - Obama crushes McCain



Senator Michelle Obama (D-IL)/General Wesley Clark (D-AR) - 53.5%, 379 EV's
Senator John McCain (R-AZ)/Minority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) - 44.6%, 159 EV's

2012 - President Obama crushes Mike "legitimate rape" Huckabee



President Michelle Obama (D-IL)/Vice President Wesley Clark (D-AR) - 55.2%, 389 EV's

Former Governor Mike Huckabee (R-AR)/Former Governor Jon Huntsman (R-UT) - 43.4%, 149 EV's

2016 - A narrow Clark win over John Gardner Ford



Vice President Wesley Clark (D-AR)/Congressman Joaquin Castro (D-TX) - 49.9%, 281 EV's
Senator John Gardner Ford (R-VA)/Governor Scott Walker (R-WI) - 48.1%, 257 EV's

Logged
SATW
SunriseAroundTheWorld
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,463
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4544 on: May 07, 2015, 02:26:15 PM »


Jeb Bush-Susana Martinez, Republican: 180 EVs
Hillary Clinton-Mark Warner, Democratic: 178 EVs
Ted Cruz-Nikki Haley, Conservative Alliance: 105 EVs
Elizabeth Warren-Bernie Sanders, United Progressive Front: 75 EVs


Best States:

Bush-Martinez:
- Nebraska: 52%
- Utah: 49%
- Wyoming: 47%
- Alabama: 45%
- Florida: 44%

Clinton-Warner:
- Washington D.C.: 57%
- New York: 53%
- California: 48%
- Illinois: 46%
- New Jersey: 45%

Cruz-Haley:
- Oklahoma: 56%
- Idaho: 49%
- Louisiana: 48%
- South Carolina: 46%
- South Dakota: 44%

Warren-Sanders:
- Vermont: 64%
- Massachusetts: 57%
- Hawaii: 49%
- Rhode Island: 44%
- Delaware: 42%
Logged
SATW
SunriseAroundTheWorld
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,463
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4545 on: May 07, 2015, 02:44:40 PM »

Popular Vote:
- Jeb Bush-Susana Martinez, Republican: 30.75%
- Hillary Clinton-Mark Warner, Democratic: 30.66%
- Ted Cruz-Nikki Haley, Conservative Alliance: 22.54%
- Elizabeth Warren-Bernie Sanders, United Progressive Front: 16.05%

Right-Left Popular Vote United:
- Right-Wing: 53.29%
- Left-Wing: 46.71%
Logged
VPH
vivaportugalhabs
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,682
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4546 on: May 07, 2015, 05:58:46 PM »



Clinton vs Cruz
Logged
SingingAnalyst
mathstatman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4547 on: May 08, 2015, 06:59:21 PM »

How likely is this map if Clinton selects Joe Manchin and Bush selects Susan Collins, Mark Kirk, or Rob Portman?


Clinton 269
Bush 269
Logged
NHI
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4548 on: May 10, 2015, 08:00:46 AM »

√ (D) John F. Kennedy/Lyndon Johnson: 378 (55.2%)
(R) Barry Goldwater/William Miller: 170 (44.3%)

√ (D) Lyndon Johnson/Hubert Humphrey: 380 (45.7%)
(R) Nelson Rockefeller/Margaret C. Chase: 105 (37.1%)
(I) George Wallace/Curtis LeMay (16.2%)

√ (R) Ronald Reagan/George Romney: 352 (53.9%)
(D) Hubert Humphrey/Edmund Muskie: 186 (45.5%)

√ (R) Ronald Reagan/George Romney: 338 (51.7%)
Edward M. Kennedy/Jimmy Carter: 200 (47.5%)

√ (D) Lloyd Bentsen/Bill Clinton: 310 (51.1%)
(R) Bob Dole/Peter Wilson: 228 (48.3%)

√ (D) Lloyd Bentsen/Bill Clinton: 523 (62.2%)
(R) Ron Paul/Bob Smith: 15 (36.9%)

√ (D) Bill Clinton/Paul Simon: 347 (52.3%)
(R) Lamar Alexander/Dan Quayle: 191 (45.9%)

√ (R) Jack Kemp/Maureen Reagan: 473 (58.1%)
(D) Bill Clinton/Paul Simon: 65 (40.9%)

√ (R) Jack Kemp/Maureen Reagan: 519 (61.7%)
(D) John Kerry/Ann Richards: 19 (37.5%)

(D) John F. Kennedy, Jr./Bob Graham: 269 (49.6%)*
(R) Maureen Reagan/Colin Powell*: 269 (49.5%)
* Kennedy elected President via the House, Powell via the Senate.

√ (D) John F. Kennedy/Bob Graham: 341 (52.1%)
(R) Haley Barbour/John Thune: 197 (46.4%)
Logged
NHI
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4549 on: May 10, 2015, 08:09:51 AM »

√ (R) John McCain/Olympia Snowe: 273 (48.5%)
(D) Mark Warner/John Edwards: 264 (48.1%)
(I) Jill Stein/Ralph Nader: 0 (2.1%)

√ (R) Olympia Snowe/Charlie Crist: 432 (57.7%)
(D) Gray Davis/Deval Patrick: 106 (42.8%)
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 177 178 179 180 181 [182] 183 184 185 186 187 ... 238  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.55 seconds with 11 queries.