Reuters primary polling: tracking thread. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 10:18:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  Reuters primary polling: tracking thread. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Reuters primary polling: tracking thread.  (Read 48508 times)
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« on: September 10, 2015, 03:17:40 PM »

Ipsos online is rated at C+ by fivethirtyeight, so slightly more reliable than gravis. Both Hillary and Bernies movements btw are within the margin of error from there last three polls.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2015, 02:41:43 PM »

http://ipsos-na.com/download/pr.aspx?id=14934
Well, Hillary actually leads by 21%....
Dems:
Clinton- 46%
Sanders- 25%
Biden- 19%
Chafee- 1%
Cuomo(?)- 1%
Gillibrand(??)- 1%
O'Malley - 1%
Webb - 0%

Republicans:
Trump- 32%
Carson- 12%
Bush- 10%   
Fiorina- 8%   
Paul- 7%   
Rubio- 7%
Christie- 5%   
Cruz- 5%   
Huckabee- 3%      
Santorum- 2%   
Gilmore- 1%   
Jindal- 1%   
Kasich- 1%   
Pataki- 0%   
Graham- 0%   
   

Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2015, 08:22:35 AM »

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/20/us-usa-election-poll-idUSKCN0SD2EJ20151020
Clinton 51%
Sanders 27%
Biden 13%

Its Reuters/Ipsos, Hillary up 10 from the last poll. Biden down 6.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2015, 11:15:14 PM »

The lead narrows by 14 points in just one week.

Nov. 3
Clinton 59.0
Sanders 26.5
O'Malley 5.4

Nov. 10
Clinton 51.8
Sanders  33.3
O'Malley 3.6


It's NOT happening, remember when Clinton was down in the 40s in this poll? She spiked back up.

That was with Biden. This is the lowest she's been since they removed Biden.

Your really grasping at straws.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2015, 07:08:06 PM »

Wow, 2 polls today with Hillary under 50%. NBC was the other one.

Nov 20.
Clinton 48.9
Sanders 34.0
O'Malley 3.7

The Republican side is much less close.
Trump 38.8
Carson 14.3
Rubio 11.1
Cruz 7.4
Bush 6.3
Paul 5.1
Huckabee 2.8
Fiornia 2.5
Christie 2.5
Kasich 2.5
Santorum 1.1
Jindal 0.5
Graham 0.5
Pataki 0.4
Gilmore 0.2


The are the 3 closest Democratic polls without Biden
This Reuter poll 49-34
IBD/TIPP poll from a couple weeks ago 49-34
NBC poll release today 49-33

Yeah, Wow...
I'll make sure to post when shes back up into the mid-50s by the middle of next week. Just like 10 days ago, the movement in these polls make them hard to take seriously.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #5 on: November 25, 2015, 10:14:31 PM »
« Edited: November 25, 2015, 10:16:21 PM by Fusionmunster »

The tracking poll has different numbers. They're as of the 24th, and
Clinton 54.0
Sanders 34.0
O'Malley 4.6

Sample size is smaller than usual, 383.

Ipsos=/=Daily Tracking poll.

Im not sure why we have one thread for both of them since its two different pollsters. Ipsos is the better pollster according to fivethirtyeights ratings btw.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #6 on: December 01, 2015, 07:44:53 PM »
« Edited: December 01, 2015, 07:48:08 PM by Fusionmunster »

Look what happens when you turn off the Democratic filter.

Sanders 34.0
Clinton 32.0
O'Malley 6.0

LOL. Of course Bernie isn't actually ahead.

Uhmm....

I hate to break it to you, but this is the democratic primary. I.E a majority of the people voting in it will be democrats. And when I remove the filter it becomes this:

http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TR131/dates/20151123-20151127/type/day

And when I filter it to only Republicans and Independents I get this:

http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TR131/filters/PARTY_ID_:3|2

Neither show him ahead.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #7 on: December 01, 2015, 10:16:49 PM »

Look what happens when you turn off the Democratic filter.

Sanders 34.0
Clinton 32.0
O'Malley 6.0

LOL. Of course Bernie isn't actually ahead.

Please, stop it. This poll is nonsense, of course, you were happy to champion it when goes rogue, but no one should take a poll this jumpy seriously.

I guess no one read the bolded sentence.

We all assumed you were being sarcastic.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #8 on: December 03, 2015, 05:52:44 PM »

Sanders within 15%? Has that ever happened before post-Biden?

Yeah, like two weeks ago.

Then Hillary opened up a 30 point lead 6 days later.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #9 on: December 07, 2015, 11:16:05 PM »
« Edited: December 07, 2015, 11:25:21 PM by Fusionmunster »


It's almost funny, if it weren't so sad. Every time Sanders is within 15%, they're all here, but then a few days later she's back to a 25%+ lead.

You have to click on day for the 5 day average. These are the correct results for Dec. 4.
Clinton 51.9
Sanders 35.5
O'Malley 4.1

Thus confirming Reuters is even more of a joke.

I'm not sure if it was a bug. But these seem to be the correct result. It might have been choosing some other time period before.

Anyways, this is the only post Thanksgiving weekend national poll we have so far.
http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TR131/type/smallest/filters/PARTY_ID_:1/dates/20150901-20151204/collapsed/false/spotlight/1

This is what I get. Regardless, the website is awfull since the redesign and combined with the fact that they're a pretty awfull pollster in general(C from fivethirtyeight and wild swings), it makes me wish I could just ignore them completely. However, you make a big deal about any slight movement in Bernies favor and then vanish when Hillary opens up a 28 point lead. Its hard to take your input in this thread seriously.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #10 on: December 08, 2015, 12:02:55 AM »
« Edited: December 08, 2015, 12:12:12 AM by Fusionmunster »

Hillary had a 27 point lead last week and 28 point lead a week or so before that. Jfern, if you dont get it I was referring to the 28 point lead in past and more than likely future tense.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #11 on: December 14, 2015, 09:40:08 AM »

Oh Jfern, I've got something to show you...
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2016, 05:22:42 PM »


No, those are the actual Ipsos numbers.
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/polls/ipsos-reuters-23740
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 13 queries.