NH-WMUR: Clinton close to GOP except against Trump (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:08:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NH-WMUR: Clinton close to GOP except against Trump (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NH-WMUR: Clinton close to GOP except against Trump  (Read 7082 times)
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« on: August 06, 2015, 09:38:27 AM »
« edited: August 06, 2015, 09:40:59 AM by King »

Obama was down 42-50 to Romney in September 2011 in the WMUR poll.

http://www.wmur.com/Primary-Poll-Shows-Romney-With-Strong-Lead/11839858

This thread should be retitled Clinton in excellent shape, dominating against Trump.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2015, 09:42:45 AM »

Obama was down 10 points in New Hampshire in August 2011.

The state has a lot of very easily persuaded voters IMO.

More importantly, Republicans and Sanders are saturating the media attention there right now. Same with 2012 when Obama had yet to launch a campaign there yet.

Clinton just now started running ads in New Hampshire.  The fact that the commercial breaks probably look like a FOX News panel show at the moment and she's only down 1 shows how strong she is at the moment.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #2 on: August 06, 2015, 09:45:34 AM »

Obama was down 42-50 to Romney in September 2011 in the WMUR poll.

http://www.wmur.com/Primary-Poll-Shows-Romney-With-Strong-Lead/11839858

This thread should be retitled Clinton in excellent shape, dominating against Trump.

Because poll unskewing worked so well in 2014, right?

I'm not unskewing this poll. I'm accepting it is accurate and Clinton only being down 1-2 points to most of the field and leading the current frontrunner by 8 points during a complete saturation of the market by Republicans and her main primary opponent (aka getting outspent 18 to 1) only shows this is safe D.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2015, 10:00:11 AM »

Nice irrelevant link that challenges no point I made.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2015, 10:42:08 AM »

According to most users on this forum, every swing state but North Carolina and Ohio is fool's gold for the GOP.

The simple rule should be that if it didn't vote for W in 2004, why in the hell would it vote for Jeb in 2016? Republicans don't have a transformational candidate, a bad economy, or really anything to earn picking off a Kerry state for no reason.

NH, PA, MN, MI, WI, NV, NM, VA. They just concede those states.... oh wait...

Bottom line: We can read into these early polls as much as we want, the election is still unpredictable.

They should concede these states. Complete waste of time.

The other four are winnable, but they are showing no interest in winning them.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #5 on: August 06, 2015, 02:09:25 PM »

lol at this delusional strawmanning. Still no argument as to why the f- a Kerry 2004 state would go GOP in 2016 for no damn reason other than it makes it convenient to imagine a scenario where Hillary loses.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.