Will the winner in 2016 be a one-term president?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 02:48:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Will the winner in 2016 be a one-term president?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Will the winner in 2016 be a one-term president?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 72

Author Topic: Will the winner in 2016 be a one-term president?  (Read 6318 times)
bagelman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,630
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: August 31, 2015, 07:43:53 PM »

I think it depends less on the party in power than the person, but if we get a good GOP candidate the answer is probably no, and if we get Hillary Clinton then the answer is yes. At best she'd be the Bush Sr. to Obama's Reagan. At worst she'd be corrupt.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,702
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 16, 2015, 03:23:46 PM »



Larry Sabato's take on reapportionment. (I know that's not what this thread was originally for, but let's face it, that's what this thread is now)

Oregon gaining a seat might be interesting.

As West Virginia loses seats and relevancy, maybe Democrats here will stop mourning that the party isn't competitive there anymore?

As far as I know, by the 2020 census will not chance the electoral college in this year. The first election with the new numbers will be 2024.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,708
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: September 16, 2015, 05:59:45 PM »

Hard to say if Clinton is elected. She wont be Bush Sr. Both Bushes weren't done in by themselves; they were done in by their VP's Quayle & Cheney. Quayle made damaging remarks to women's groups, Clinton is a woman herself and majority of voters are females.
Logged
Hydera
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: September 19, 2015, 01:01:44 PM »

Traditionally a recession occurs once every 5-9 years and were getting really close. So... Yes.
Logged
WVdemocrat
DimpledChad
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 954
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: September 19, 2015, 01:15:27 PM »

I don't get the idea that we're due for a recession. We are seeing sustained long-term growth under President Obama rather than the jumping from boom to boom as has happened in the past. I'm not sure history will repeat itself in this case.
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: September 19, 2015, 02:00:46 PM »

Traditionally a recession occurs once every 5-9 years and were getting really close. So... Yes.

Naht if Bernie wins and reintroduces Glass-Steagall.
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,725


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: September 20, 2015, 10:49:48 AM »

If there is a minor recession (and it seems like the next one will be minor), 90% of Americans won't even know that there is one going on.  I actually think that the minor recession is just starting right now, but we will see.
Logged
Hydera
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: September 20, 2015, 10:55:07 AM »
« Edited: September 20, 2015, 10:59:46 AM by Hydera »

Traditionally a recession occurs once every 5-9 years and were getting really close. So... Yes.

Naht if Bernie wins and reintroduces Glass-Steagall.

Sanders supporters need to try to learn to be funny not retards.


If there is a minor recession (and it seems like the next one will be minor), 90% of Americans won't even know that there is one going on.  I actually think that the minor recession is just starting right now, but we will see.


 

I think the recent drop in oil prices and if china does have a economic crash(stock market doesn't count). That might mean a more catastrophic crash in the oil sector(since china has fueled a lot of the post-2000's oil price rise) and exporters to china and domestic companies when their businesses in china go down. Might cause a feedback effect back in home which would be the start of that minor recession.


2001-2002, 1990-1991 were minor recessions.

I'm hoping for the latter not the former...

The mountain+mexico gulf states that benefited from the boom in oil prices could get really angry if unemployment rises.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: September 20, 2015, 11:57:09 PM »

Mild Recession and Hillary is President: She still gets re-elected

Mild or Disastrous Recession and a Republican is President: He or she loses

Disastrous Recession and Hillary is President: She might lose.

Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,708
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: September 21, 2015, 01:08:21 AM »

We absorbed the 2014 and 2015 recession. Now the economy is in full rebound. There might be some backsliding in Winter 2016, but nothing like 2014. The case for an all GOP govt is gone like it did after 2011.
Logged
m4567
Rookie
**
Posts: 220
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: September 23, 2015, 04:49:56 PM »

The longest period without a recession? 1961-1974?
Logged
Cryptic
Shadowlord88
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 891


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: September 24, 2015, 03:37:37 AM »

Ask again when 2020 rolls around.
Logged
Mordecai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,465
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: September 24, 2015, 07:09:31 AM »

It pretty much all depends on when the next recession is, so it's anybody's guess, really.

This, and how organized Republicans are after 2016.
Logged
bballrox4717
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 949


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: September 24, 2015, 08:12:52 AM »

I think there's a significant chance on both sides. Voters will likely be a lot less forgiving to a third term Democrat if things start going badly. At the same time though, the party is still very united and is gaining demographically.

IMO it's more likely for the Republicans though because the current GOP Congress will want to push through as much conservative legislation as possible if they still control the House and Senate. There's either going to be a split between the president and Congress or the president lurches too far to the right to get reelected.
Logged
RFayette
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,959
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: October 16, 2015, 04:01:45 PM »

I'd say it's about a 51% chance right now.

I'd lean more toward 70-75%.  I just have a hard time believing there won't be a recession between 2017-2020, and it seems like a 2019-2020 recession is at least somewhat probable.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,197
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: October 16, 2015, 09:23:55 PM »

Given how bad both sides are, certainly.

1976 style victory for the GOP or 1988 style victory for the Dems seem like the only possible outcomes right now.

Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,764


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: October 16, 2015, 09:50:33 PM »

Given how bad both sides are, certainly.

1976 style victory for the GOP or 1988 style victory for the Dems seem like the only possible outcomes right now.



I completely agree
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,708
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: October 18, 2015, 01:25:26 PM »

Since I think Clinton and Castro will win, hopefully not since I want Kennedy replaced on SCOTUS and he will leave sometime before 2022.

Barring another economic meltdown and 2018 midterm is a neutral and not a GOP wave; Dems can keep it going.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 13 queries.