Is US-style fluidity of religious identity a good thing? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:40:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Is US-style fluidity of religious identity a good thing? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is US-style fluidity of religious identity a good thing?
#1
Yes		  
#2
No		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 24

Author Topic: Is US-style fluidity of religious identity a good thing?  (Read 1549 times)
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


« on: August 13, 2015, 12:01:42 PM »
Quote from: DavidB. on August 13, 2015, 11:11:57 AM
It's good because it prevents overt "tribalism"/sectarianism, and it's good for social cohesion in society. It's bad for communities and social cohesion within communities.

Agreed, unless entire communities or at least families change their religious identity. Then they form a new community.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 14 queries.