I don't really care. Posts are low quality and he identifies as a secular humanist.
This is disgusting. Don't condone bullying another forum member senselessly just because of the the way he posts and his political views.
Did you actually look at his posts? Or for that matter, any of the posts anyone made about him? Like, can you actually point to the meanest post directed at him? I actually don't see any reason to think that he's a sock, but from what I can see he certainly made a couple of objectively bad posts right off the bat that would be indicative of someone who is not here to make constructive contributions. And when he made those bad posts, he got some mild criticism for it just like any established poster would if they posted the same thing. Here was my only interaction with him:
You should include Hindus and Buddhists, and Other.
Sorry. Just check "Atheist" then.
You're bad at this.
Is that cyberbullying? Is that relentlessly cruel?
You have a history of going on fruitless witch hunts against posters you disagree with. I dont think you have any room to talk here to talk
I am not accusing The Groom of being a sock, nor would I call for his banning. I am merely questioning whether those who are reflexively criticizing the criticism of The Groom have looked at the facts. Green Line, I apologize for accusing you of being a sock before. That was rash of me, and I'm sorry. However, I will not apologize for calling you a troll because at the time your only contribution to the forum was that horrible troll thread about Jeb Bush's wife which rightly raised some red flags.
Likewise, when someone comes to the forum and immediately makes threads like this
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=217648.msg4694940#msg4694940 , it should raise some red flags, and being new shouldn't make that poster immune from criticism. Political ideology has nothing to do with it.