A divisive primary isn’t going to cost GOP the White House. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 03:52:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  A divisive primary isn’t going to cost GOP the White House. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: A divisive primary isn’t going to cost GOP the White House.  (Read 1404 times)
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« on: August 20, 2015, 03:54:55 PM »

Usually, in a rough primary, the serious candidate closest to the other side wins.

See: Carter 1976/1980, Ford 1976, Clinton 1992, Kerry 2004, McCain 2008, Romney 2012.

In 1992, Tsongas was more centrist on economics than Clinton, but socially to his left. The only time the non-closest since primaries began has won were: Reagan 1980(debatatable), Goldwater 1964, Dukakis 1988, and, possibly, Obama 2008.

As you can see, Webb/Kasich would be the most likely to win if they manage to gain ground in early states. Otherwise, they are comparable to Huntsman or Edwards.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.