Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2013, 01:05:08 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Bacon King)
| | |-+  George H. W. Bush vs. Al Gore
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: George H. W. Bush vs. Al Gore  (Read 2845 times)
PBrunsel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9644


View Profile WWW
« on: April 16, 2004, 04:34:57 pm »
Ignore

I vote for Bush. Bush was far more expierienced then Gore in 1988.
Logged


"I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side."
-President Abraham Lincoln, December 1862
JohnFKennedy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7572


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2004, 04:35:56 pm »
Ignore

to be fair, would you EVER vote for Gore? Wink lol.
Logged
opebo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 44650


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2004, 04:59:03 pm »
Ignore

I would vote for Gore over say, Stalin.  Actually if Gore were the farthest right candidate for president I would be making plans for fleeing the country, not for voting.
Anyway, George H.W. Bush gets my vote.
Logged

prostitutes, bedpans, toupees etc.

© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34292
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2004, 05:25:49 pm »
Ignore

Gore

My primary vote in 1988
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Ben.
Ben
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4223


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2004, 09:48:31 am »
Ignore

Gore had he been the dems candidate in 1988 we would have won... I mean if Dukakis held an 17 piont lead over Bush I expect that Gore would have done better than Dukakis and added to that with Bentsen as a running mate I really think he would have won and proably fairly solidly....
Logged

.Britain’s Mayor.
PBrunsel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9644


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 17, 2004, 04:57:04 pm »
Ignore

Ron Paul, of course.

He probaly is the better choice out of the two.
Logged


"I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side."
-President Abraham Lincoln, December 1862
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34292
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2004, 05:09:16 pm »
Ignore

Paul is too conservative for me...probably the best nominee the Libs could conjure up fro a long time though.
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Neil.A
Rookie
*
Posts: 33


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 18, 2004, 12:02:25 pm »
Ignore

Gore
Logged
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34292
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: April 18, 2004, 06:02:50 pm »
Ignore

Paul is too conservative for me...probably the best nominee the Libs could conjure up fro a long time though.

I agree he is the best nominee the LP could get philosophically speaking. From a purely popularity perspective perhaps (Whew! What alliteration!) Clint Eastwood.

I didn't know Eastwood was a libertarian.
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
angus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13102
Political Matrix
E: 1.87, S: -7.65

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 20, 2004, 02:37:56 pm »
Ignore

Gore

My primary vote in 1988

mine was dukakis  Smiley

Things have obviously changed for the better since then.



I voted GHWB assuming my current frame of mind.  If I assumed my 1988 frame of mind all those candidates would make me sick and I'd have voted for the socialist.


One constant for me, in my philosophical journey from the far left to the middle, has been my abject loathing for Albert Gore.  I didn't like him in1988, the first time I voted for president, and I didn't like him in 2000, the most recent time.  I think he may have been far to conservative on the social issues for me, both then and now.  On the economic issues, I was never really clear where he stood or what he stands for, except himself.
Logged
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34292
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: April 21, 2004, 07:00:15 am »
Ignore


mine was dukakis  Smiley

Why would you vote for him?!?!

I hated Dukakis.
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
PBrunsel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9644


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: April 24, 2004, 05:54:20 pm »
Ignore

No one has posted a map yet, so i guess I will.



Al Gore: 350
George Bush: 188
« Last Edit: April 24, 2004, 05:55:04 pm by Gubernatorial Candidate PBrunsel »Logged


"I know that the Lord is always on the side of the right. But it is my constant anxiety and prayer that I and this nation should be on the Lord's side."
-President Abraham Lincoln, December 1862
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34292
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: April 25, 2004, 08:47:15 am »
Ignore

No one has posted a map yet, so i guess I will.



Al Gore: 350
George Bush: 188

But you have to use the Dukakis numbers, right?
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Ben.
Ben
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4223


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2004, 09:04:24 am »
Ignore



I think that Gore would have been a very strong candidate back in 88, add a good solid, experienced running mate and I think that Bush would have been defeated by a solid margin... However the race would have been competitive rather like 1976 really, with an incumbent VP against a strong southern moderate challenger so I think a firm Gore win... as for a gore administration I think he'd be likely to be pretty much like Clinton was and while Gore lacked Clinton's charm and charisma i reckon he would be likely to win re-election in 1992, however not by as great a margin as Clinton managed in 1996...    
Logged

.Britain’s Mayor.
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34292
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: April 25, 2004, 09:40:40 am »
Ignore



I think that Gore would have been a very strong candidate back in 88, add a good solid, experienced running mate and I think that Bush would have been defeated by a solid margin... However the race would have been competitive rather like 1976 really, with an incumbent VP against a strong southern moderate challenger so I think a firm Gore win... as for a gore administration I think he'd be likely to be pretty much like Clinton was and while Gore lacked Clinton's charm and charisma i reckon he would be likely to win re-election in 1992, however not by as great a margin as Clinton managed in 1996...    

Gore would have won CA.  Dukakis only lost it by 3% or so.
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory