Mideast Record-Courier Polls: October 2015 Presidential Election

[Unconditional Surrender Truman]

Please select your preferred candidate for president in each of the hypothetical races listed above (you have 6 votes, one for each scenario). This poll is for all likely voters and will run for 3 days.

Scenario 1: Clarence vs. Kalwejt

Scenario 2: Clarence vs. Windjammer

Scenario 3: Cris vs. Kalwejt

Scenario 4: Lumine vs. Windjammer

Scenario 5: Cincinnatus vs. Generic conservative vs. Generic progressive

Scenario 6: Cris vs. Oakvale

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

How did you know I'm considering it?

[Unconditional Surrender Truman]

How did you know I'm considering it?

Lucky guess?

[Oakvale]

All the options other than Clarence or Cinci would kill Atlasia off for good. I include myself in that, although in my case it would be deliberate.

[Lincoln Republican]

Clarence. 

No question.

[Leinad]

Good poll, although I'm interested in how you decided those matchups. I'd kind of like to see stuff like Lumine vs. Kalwejt, Cris vs. Windjammer, and Clarence and Lumine each vs. Oakvale. Why is it only these 6, Senator-elect Truman?

[Unconditional Surrender Truman]

Good poll, although I'm interested in how you decided those matchups. I'd kind of like to see stuff like Lumine vs. Kalwejt, Cris vs. Windjammer, and Clarence and Lumine each vs. Oakvale. Why is it only these 6, Senator-elect Truman?

Partly because I didn't want to type the code for 9-10 scenarios . However, there was some method to the madness. The idea was not so much to gauge how well each individual candidate would do in every possible scenario as it was to see how the electorate is thinking. The Cris-Oakvale matchup, for example, pits one of the most vocal supporters of the ConCon against the leader of the Dissolution Movement (I chose Cris rather than Kalwejt or Windjammer because I wanted to eliminate the left-right dynamic).

[Leinad]

Good poll, although I'm interested in how you decided those matchups. I'd kind of like to see stuff like Lumine vs. Kalwejt, Cris vs. Windjammer, and Clarence and Lumine each vs. Oakvale. Why is it only these 6, Senator-elect Truman?

Partly because I didn't want to type the code for 9-10 scenarios . However, there was some method to the madness. The idea was not so much to gauge how well each individual candidate would do in every possible scenario as it was to see how the electorate is thinking. The Cris-Oakvale matchup, for example, pits one of the most vocal supporters of the ConCon against the leader of the Dissolution Movement (I chose Cris rather than Kalwejt or Windjammer because I wanted to eliminate the left-right dynamic).

Interesting. And we do get to compare the candidates: Clarence and Cris because they're both up against Kalwejt, Clarence and Lumine because they're both up against Windjammer, and Kalwejt and Windjammer because they're both up against Clarence. We could then extrapolate that to compare candidates like Cris vs. Windjammer or whatever. I might do some crazy stuff like myself that when the poll's done, we'll see.

[Leinad]

My top three just out of those candidates: Clarence, Cris, and Lumine. That's in alphabetical order, so nothing to read into from that.

[Unconditional Surrender Truman]

Scenario 1: Clarence vs. Kalwejt
Fmr. Sen. Clarence (Fed): 14 (51.9%)
Sen. Kalwejt (Lab): 10 (37.0%)
Other/Unsure: 3 (11.1%)

Scenario 2: Clarence vs. Windjammer
Fmr. Sen. Clarence (Fed): 9 (37.5%)
Gov. Windjammer (Lab): 9 (37.5%)
Other/Unsure: 6 (25.0%)

Scenario 3: Cris vs. Kalwejt
Sen. Cris (CR): 14 (53.8%)
Sen. Kalwejt (Lab): 8 (30.8%)
Other/Unsure: 4 (15.4%)

Scenario 4: Von Reuental vs. Windjammer
Sen. Lumine Von Reuental (CR): 13 (54.2%)
Gov. Windjammer (Lab): 8 (33.3%)
Other/Unsure: 3 (12.5%)

Scenario 5: Cincinnatus vs. Generic progressive vs. Generic conservative
Vice President Cincinnatus (TPP): 9 (36.0%)
Generic conservative: 8 (32.0%)
Generic progressive: 7 (28.0%)
Other/Unsure: 1 (4.0%)

Scenario 6: Cris vs. Oakvale
Sen. Cris (CR): 15 (60.0%)
Justice Oakvale (NNP): 8 (32.0%)
Other/Unsure: 2 (8.0%)