Cleaned-up 2016 Presidential election map.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 11:54:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Cleaned-up 2016 Presidential election map.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14
Author Topic: Cleaned-up 2016 Presidential election map.  (Read 71405 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #125 on: November 20, 2015, 12:29:05 PM »
« edited: December 03, 2015, 06:49:02 PM by pbrower2a »

Virginia: Roanoke University:

Clinton 44, Carson 44
Clinton 45, Rubio 41
Clinton 50, Trump 36
Clinton 46, Bush 39
Clinton 46, Fiorina 39
Clinton 47, Cruz 39

http://www.roanoke.edu/Documents/rcpoll/Nov2015.Consumer%20Sentiment%20and%20Politics%20Topline.pdf

It could be Virginia. Due to the proximity of DC and the large number of well-educated government employees, the Virginia electorate might be more savvy and less likely to swing on an event that does not involve the credibility of a politician. Hillary Clinton has recovered from the investigation of the server 'scandal' and of the death of an American diplomat in Benghazi, which may not have been reflected in the most recent polls.

Ben Carson still ties with Hillary Clinton here, but this shows a loss of the Carson lead.

"As Virginia goes, so goes America"? No, not yet. Virginia could be the tipping point state this time, which defines who wins. But Virginia has been 'right' for only four Presidential elections. No better than Colorado or Florida, but better than all but two states.

So how far do the states go in being right on the Presidential elections?

One only -- none.
Two -- CA CT DE DC HI IL ME MD MA MI MN NH NJ NY OR PA RI VT WA WI
Three -- IA NM
Four (2000) -- CO FL VA
Seven (1980) -- NV
Eleven (1964) -- OH

Bold indicates hyper-partisan D states.

So what will it be if a Republican wins decisively?

Two -- IN NC
Three (your pick) ME NH OR PA and all that voted 'wrong' in 2012
Four -- IA, maybe
Five -- CO FL VA
Eight -- NV, maybe
Twelve -- OH

If a Democrat barely wins
One -- unlikely
Three -- CA CT DE DC HI IL ME MD MA MI MN NH NJ NY OR PA RI VT WA WI
Four -- IA maybe, NM
Five -- CO maybe, VA
Eight -- NV
Twelve -- OH maybe

If a Democrat wins decisively, but well short of a landslide (Obama 2012)

One -- unlikely, NC and NE-02 most likely
Three -- CA CT DE DC HI IL ME MD MA MI MN NH NJ NY OR PA RI VT WA WI
Four -- IA
Five -- CO, FL maybe, VA
Eight -- NV
Twelve -- OH  

A firm Democratic win (Obama 2000, Clinton 1992/1996) -- best left to your imagination.



 

If I am picking any state to decide the 2016 election it is Virginia. Watch Virginia.





Hillary Clinton vs. Jeb Bush



Hillary Clinton vs. Ben Carson



Hillary Clinton vs. Carly Fiorina




Hillary Clinton vs. Mike Huckabee




Hillary Clinton vs. Marco Rubio



Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump



30% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 3% or less
40% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 4% or more
60% -- lead with 50-54%
70% -- lead with 55-59%
90% -- lead with 60% or more

Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #126 on: November 20, 2015, 02:31:04 PM »
« Edited: November 20, 2015, 02:37:35 PM by pbrower2a »

Marquette University Law School, Wisconsin.

Hillary Clinton loses once-large leads in Wisconsin, most likely because the boost that Republicans get from any fear of terror that terrorist crimes in Paris created. Republicans have been pushing fear of terrorism lately. Whether such backfires is to be seen.


Clinton 44 -- Carson 45
Clinton 44 -- Rubio 45
Clinton 48 -- Trump 37

In other news, Wisconsin voters will likely dump Senator Ron Johnson for former Senator Russ Feingold; they more trust Democrats than Republicans in the State legislature.






Hillary Clinton vs. Jeb Bush



Hillary Clinton vs. Ben Carson



Hillary Clinton vs. Carly Fiorina




Hillary Clinton vs. Mike Huckabee




Hillary Clinton vs. Marco Rubio



Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump



30% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 3% or less
40% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 4% or more
60% -- lead with 50-54%
70% -- lead with 55-59%
90% -- lead with 60% or more
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #127 on: November 20, 2015, 02:38:34 PM »

I'm ready to dump Mike Huckabee for Ted Cruz. Are you?
Logged
JonathanSwift
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,122
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #128 on: November 20, 2015, 03:29:44 PM »

I'm ready to dump Mike Huckabee for Ted Cruz. Are you?


Sounds good to me.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #129 on: November 20, 2015, 03:32:48 PM »

Based on the latest polling, you should only include maps with Hillary vs. Trump/Carson/Rubio/Cruz.

Bush has no place here anymore, his campaign is a joke.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #130 on: November 20, 2015, 04:50:12 PM »

I just got polled for the 2016 primary (but not the general election) in Michigan.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #131 on: November 20, 2015, 09:43:29 PM »


Here' what I have (based upon a map that I had a month ago with more recent polls added):

VA Clinton 47, Cruz 39 (Roanoake University)
NH Clinton 44 Cruz 41 (FoX News)
CO Cruz tops Clinton 51 - 38 percent (Quinnipiac)
FL  47.9% Cruz (+3.0) 44.9% Clinton Florida Atlantic University Economics Department
SC Cruz 46, Clinton 43 (PPP)

Hillary Clinton(D) vs. Ted Cruz (R)



Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #132 on: November 20, 2015, 09:45:55 PM »

Exit Huckabee, enter Cruz.


Hillary Clinton vs. Jeb Bush



Hillary Clinton vs. Ben Carson



Hillary Clinton(D) vs. Ted Cruz (R)



Hillary Clinton vs. Carly Fiorina




Hillary Clinton vs. Marco Rubio



Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump



30% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 3% or less
40% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 4% or more
60% -- lead with 50-54%
70% -- lead with 55-59%
90% -- lead with 60% or more
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #133 on: November 20, 2015, 10:09:53 PM »

I just got polled for the 2016 primary (but not the general election) in Michigan.

By what polling firm?  And was it by phone or internet?  And if by phone, was it a live interviewer or a robo-call?
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #134 on: November 21, 2015, 12:54:04 AM »

I just got polled for the 2016 primary (but not the general election) in Michigan.

By what polling firm?  And was it by phone or internet?  And if by phone, was it a live interviewer or a robo-call?


Phone with a live interviewer. The pollster never identified himself.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #135 on: December 02, 2015, 02:41:03 AM »
« Edited: December 02, 2015, 08:16:56 AM by pbrower2a »

Utah, Dan Jones. I have no idea of how valid this pollster is, but I have no cause to disbelieve that Hillary Clinton would be clobbered by any Republican -- except Donald Trump -- in Utah.  Trump would fare unusually badly (if not badly enough to lose) by GOP standards in Utah because of his involvement in businesses that do not uphold Mormon values.

56-24 Carson/Clinton
48-21 Rubio/Clinton
48-23 Bush/Clinton
37-26 Trump/Clinton

http://utahpolicy.com/index.php/features/today-at-utah-policy/7798-poll-shows-clinton-would-lose-handily-to-gop-candidates-in-utah


It fills some gaps as I would expect it to fill those gaps. No Cruz or Fiorina, though! 
...I need a category for someone ahead in Utah (or any state) with less than 40% of the likely vote, as Trump appears here. I will put it in the "tie" category.  


Hillary Clinton vs. Jeb Bush



Hillary Clinton vs. Ben Carson



Hillary Clinton(D) vs. Ted Cruz (R)



Hillary Clinton vs. Carly Fiorina




Hillary Clinton vs. Marco Rubio



Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump



30% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 3% or less
40% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 4% or more
60% -- lead with 50-54%
70% -- lead with 55-59%
90% -- lead with 60% or more

White -- tie or  someone leading with less than 40%.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #136 on: December 02, 2015, 06:03:42 PM »

Quinnipiac national poll, conducted Nov. 23-30:

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2307

Clinton 46%
Carson 43%

Clinton 47%
Trump 41%

Clinton 45%
Rubio 44%

Clinton 47%
Cruz 42%

Sanders 47%
Carson 41%

Sanders 49%
Trump 41%

Sanders 44%
Rubio 43%

Sanders 49%
Cruz 39%

...This nationwide poll is inconsistent with recent Q polls of swing states. But just about every pollster showed Republican candidates  for President surging just after the terrorist attacks in Paris. Statistical blips related to events are as real and genuine as the events themselves.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #137 on: December 07, 2015, 01:44:30 PM »
« Edited: December 08, 2015, 09:58:22 PM by pbrower2a »

North Carolina, PPP:

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_NC_120815.pdf

Clinton 43, Bush 43
Clinton 43, Cruz 47
Clinton 43, Trump 47
Clinton 42, Fiorina 44
Clinton 42, Rubio 46
Clinton 41, Carson 47

Sanders 44, Trump 46
Sanders 42, Cruz 44
Sanders 40, Fiorina 40
Sanders 39, Bush 42
Sanders 39, Rubio 44
Sanders 37, Carson 46  

........

Down from a much-more favorable environment for Hillary Clinton, likely from before the investigation of Benghazi and the server 'scandal'. Still, Democrats don't need North Carolina to win nationwide,  and it hasn't been even close to being a tipping-point state since 1976.

If North Carolina is at all close for Hillary Clinton on Election Night, then Republicans are going to have a very bad time.  

PPP gives its story on Iowa next week after polling in the upcoming weekend.


Hillary Clinton vs. Jeb Bush



Hillary Clinton vs. Ben Carson



Hillary Clinton(D) vs. Ted Cruz (R)



Hillary Clinton vs. Carly Fiorina




Hillary Clinton vs. Marco Rubio



Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump



30% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 3% or less
40% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 4% or more
60% -- lead with 50-54%
70% -- lead with 55-59%
90% -- lead with 60% or more

White -- tie or  someone leading with less than 40%.
Logged
5280
MagneticFree
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.97, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #138 on: December 07, 2015, 01:57:33 PM »

That's sad, Trump is doing better in Pennsylvania than Utah.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #139 on: December 07, 2015, 06:05:50 PM »

That's sad, Trump is doing better in Pennsylvania than Utah.

There will be more Pennsylvania polls; I just can't say when and by whom. Current polls of Pennsylvania come from when Hillary Clinton was ensnared in the doubt about the private server and the 'scandal' of Benghazi.

I'm just making a prediction. Pennsylvania will again look very Atlas Red on this map.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #140 on: December 10, 2015, 05:40:46 PM »

 St. Leo University, Florida.

    Clinton, 48.9 percent, vs. Trump, 41.2 percent.
    Clinton, 48.9 percent, vs. Rubio, 41.2 percent.
    Clinton, 51.2 percent, vs. Carson, 39.1 percent.
    Clinton, 47.3 percent, vs. Bush, 37.9 percent.
    Clinton, 53 percent, vs. Cruz, 34.7 percent
    Clinton, 55.2 percent, vs. former Hewlett-Packard executive Carly Fiorina, 29.7 percent.

    Clinton, 47.5 percent; Fiorina, 12.9 percent; Trump, 30.7 percent.
    Clinton, 46 percent; Cruz, 21.3 percent; Trump, 26 percent.
    Clinton, 45.5 percent; Carson, 20.3 percent; Trump, 27.7 percent,
    Clinton, 44.8 percent; Rubio, 21.8 percent; Trump, 28.2 percent.
    Clinton, 41.8 percent; Bush, 19.1 percent; Trump, 33.4 percent.

http://polls.saintleo.edu/florida-mirrors-nation-in-persistent-affinity-for-trump-or-clinton-plus-growing-concern-for-security/

No way does any Democratic nominee get 55% against any Republican nominee in Florida.Valid only if there is corroboration with other polls (for which see how I see Minnesota).
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #141 on: December 14, 2015, 10:00:01 AM »
« Edited: December 16, 2015, 07:11:16 PM by pbrower2a »

Montana, Montana State University, Billings:

Trump (R): 51%
Clinton (D): 30%

Carson (R): 60%
Clinton (D): 29%

Rubio (R): 57%
Clinton (D): 29%

Cruz (R): 56%
Clinton (D): 31%

Trump (R): 46%
Sanders (D): 40%

Carson (R): 54%
Sanders (D): 31%

Rubio (R): 48%
Sanders (D): 33%

Cruz (R): 46%
Sanders (D): 36%

http://www.msubillings.edu/urelations/releases/2015/POLL_2015.pdf


........

That Bill Clinton won Montana in 1992 and that Barack Obama came close to winning Montana in 2008 is now amazing.

   
New Strategies 360 Arizona: Clinton just behind Trump, trailing Rubio/Cruz

https://twitter.com/ConsultReid/status/677196690085031936
http://www.strategies360.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/15-340-AZ-Public-Poll-Toplines.pdf
http://www.strategies360.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/15-340-AZ-Public-Poll-CrosstabsR.pdf
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I doubt that as their political views get better known that they will do well with the Latino (in Arizona that is largely Mexican-American). Right-wing Cuban-Americans won't likely do any better among Mexican-Americans than will right-wing Anglos in getting Mexican-American votes. Arizona will probably be closer than that with Cruz or Rubio... and the poor showing of Donald Trump suggests that if he is nominated, anything goes in a state that has gone for a Democratic nominee only once since 1948.  

The tie between Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush is very, very old and likely obsolete.

Hillary Clinton vs. Jeb Bush



Hillary Clinton vs. Ben Carson



Hillary Clinton(D) vs. Ted Cruz (R)



Hillary Clinton vs. Carly Fiorina




Hillary Clinton vs. Marco Rubio



Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump



30% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 3% or less
40% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 4% or more
60% -- lead with 50-54%
70% -- lead with 55-59%
90% -- lead with 60% or more

White -- tie or  someone leading with less than 40%.

Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,776
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #142 on: December 16, 2015, 02:22:44 PM »

Cant wait til PPP start polling again, NV, CO & Iowa, take the QU bias out, and we know NH & Pa are 51/49 Dem states.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #143 on: December 16, 2015, 06:54:21 PM »
« Edited: December 16, 2015, 07:12:36 PM by pbrower2a »

Cant wait til PPP start polling again, NV, CO & Iowa, take the QU bias out, and we know NH & Pa are 51/49 Dem states.

Time is running out this year: I doubt that there will be many polls until early January.

The Q polls are now obsolete, and I predict that new Q polls will reflect a movement toward Hillary Clinton.  PPP has a national poll this week.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #144 on: December 17, 2015, 11:01:15 PM »

Iowa, PPP. Very mixed results.

Clinton (D): 41%
Rubio (R): 48%

Clinton (D): 44%
Cruz (R): 47%

Clinton (D): 46%
Bush (R): 41%

Clinton (D): 45%
Fiorina (R): 42%

Clinton (D): 45%
Trump (R): 43%

Clinton (D): 45%
Carson (R): 45%

Clinton (D): 39%
Rubio (R): 33%
Trump (I): 23%

Clinton (D): 41%
Cruz (R): 33%
Trump (I): 20%

Sanders (D): 45%
Fiorina (R): 39%

Sanders (D): 44%
Bush (R): 40%

Sanders (D): 46%
Trump (R): 43%

Sanders (D): 44%
Cruz (R): 43%

Sanders (D): 43%
Carson (R): 42%

Sanders (D): 42%
Rubio (R): 44%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2015/12/trump-third-party-bid-could-doom-gop-in-swing-state.html

Probably the last statewide matchups of 2015, unless Q has something for us next week. PPP will poll nationally this weekend. Would someone please poll Pennsylvania soon?

Hillary Clinton vs. Jeb Bush



Hillary Clinton vs. Ben Carson



Hillary Clinton(D) vs. Ted Cruz (R)



Hillary Clinton vs. Carly Fiorina




Hillary Clinton vs. Marco Rubio



Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump



30% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 3% or less
40% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 4% or more
60% -- lead with 50-54%
70% -- lead with 55-59%
90% -- lead with 60% or more

White -- tie or  someone leading with less than 40%.


Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #145 on: December 22, 2015, 12:42:41 PM »

Cant wait til PPP start polling again, NV, CO & Iowa, take the QU bias out, and we know NH & Pa are 51/49 Dem states.

Q shows some movement. It's a national poll, so it portends changes in its next set of statewide polls  of anything. But such will likely be unavailable until January.

With this  national poll I can't imagine Hillary Clinton being behind anyone in Pennsylvania or being anything other than close in Florida or Ohio. No way could she be losing to Donald Trump in Colorado, Florida, Iowa, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, or Wisconsin. She would be close to Trump in Arizona and North Carolina, at the least.

Up by 7 for Hillary Clinton? That suggests a map with a magnitude of wins at least as strong for Hillary Clinton as for Barack Obama in 2008.     

Quinnipiac national poll, conducted Dec. 16-20:

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2311

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

My maps of binary match-ups are often terribly obsolete.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #146 on: December 22, 2015, 01:36:55 PM »
« Edited: December 22, 2015, 05:06:41 PM by pbrower2a »

Here's my projection of Clinton winning by 7% against Donald Trump based upon
(1) current polls
(2) polls from before the attention to Benghazi and the private server
(3) recent electoral behavior of the states

Note: (2) is now more realistic than (1)

Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump



80% blue -- Trump by 10% or more
50% blue -- Trump by 4-9.9%
20% blue -- Trump by 1-3.9%
white -- virtual tie
20% red -- Clinton by 1-3.9%
50% red -- Clinton by 4-9.9%
80% red -- Clinton by 10% or more

If you are wondering about Kansas, Louisiana, and Utah -- Kansas seems to be getting increasingly unsatisfied with Republicans. Louisiana elected a Democrat as Governor last month. Utah? Trump is doing very badly for a Republican; I think that Mormons are dissatisfied with his business dealings and personal lifestyle.    
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #147 on: December 29, 2015, 07:57:56 PM »

Pataki has dropped out -- as if anyone really cared.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #148 on: January 09, 2016, 01:55:25 AM »

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_NH_10816.pdf

First statewide poll of 2016. It's only four electoral votes, but New Hampshire is a legitimate swing state.

(The Field Poll has some interesting polls for California, but those do not yet include binary match-ups).

vs Clinton

Clinton 45
Rubio 42

Clinton 46
Bush 40

Clinton 48
Cruz 40

Clinton 50
Carson 39

Clinton 50
Trump 36

vs Sanders

Sanders 50
Bush 38

Sanders 51
Rubio 37

Sanders 53
Carson 34

Sanders 54
Cruz 34

Sanders 54
Cruz 34

3 WAY!

Clinton 43
Rubio 29
Trump 20

Clinton 47
Cruz 28
Trump 18

Hillary Clinton vs. Jeb Bush



Hillary Clinton vs. Ben Carson



Hillary Clinton(D) vs. Ted Cruz (R)



Hillary Clinton vs. Carly Fiorina




Hillary Clinton vs. Marco Rubio



Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump



30% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 3% or less
40% -- lead with 40-49% but a margin of 4% or more
60% -- lead with 50-54%
70% -- lead with 55-59%
90% -- lead with 60% or more

White -- tie or  someone leading with less than 40%.



Logged
Hillary pays minimum wage
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 716
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #149 on: January 09, 2016, 01:57:09 AM »

So Trump wins PA, NV, and FL, but loses VA?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 1.087 seconds with 14 queries.