If it's Clinton vs. Trump
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 05:38:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  If it's Clinton vs. Trump
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If it's Clinton vs. Trump  (Read 2918 times)
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,732
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 29, 2015, 06:13:44 PM »

What will the trend map look like? I assume Southwestern states will trend Democratic from increased Hispanic turnout and working-class white states will trend Republican. Something like this, maybe?

Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,680
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2015, 06:16:22 PM »

The inland South strikes me as much more into Trump than Romney.  Also, I would be shocked if New England or the West Coast trended to Trump.  NY and NJ probably would because of Sandy, but otherwise I think the trend is fundamentally urban vs. rural.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2015, 06:24:12 PM »

Trump wouldn't lose Arkansas. Considering how extreme Republicans are the vast majority in Florida, I wouldn't be surprised if he drove turnout up there.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,732
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2015, 06:27:35 PM »

Trump wouldn't lose Arkansas. Considering how extreme Republicans are the vast majority in Florida, I wouldn't be surprised if he drove turnout up there.

It's supposed to be a trend map, with 40% shading corresponding to between a 10 and 15 point trend relative to the national swing. In order for Clinton to win Arkansas with this trend map, she'd have to carry the national popular vote by double-digits.
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2015, 07:40:38 PM »

Trump wouldn't lose Arkansas. Considering how extreme Republicans are the vast majority in Florida, I wouldn't be surprised if he drove turnout up there.

It's supposed to be a trend map, with 40% shading corresponding to between a 10 and 15 point trend relative to the national swing. In order for Clinton to win Arkansas with this trend map, she'd have to carry the national popular vote by double-digits.

Your pics of Hillary are from the period "Hillary Goldwater Girl". Not Hillary "Shrill Corrupt Hag" that she is today.
Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2015, 08:53:33 PM »

Trump wouldn't lose Arkansas. Considering how extreme Republicans are the vast majority in Florida, I wouldn't be surprised if he drove turnout up there.

It's supposed to be a trend map, with 40% shading corresponding to between a 10 and 15 point trend relative to the national swing. In order for Clinton to win Arkansas with this trend map, she'd have to carry the national popular vote by double-digits.

Your pics of Hillary are from the period "Hillary Goldwater Girl". Not Hillary "Shrill Corrupt Hag" that she is today.

ok...What is your point?
Logged
TJ in Oregon
TJ in Cleve
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,952
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 29, 2015, 08:57:50 PM »

Why would states like Wisconsin and Minnesota trend toward Trump, while Trump does worse in states loaded with working class whites like West Virginia and Kentucky? The North/South trend thing only makes sense for areas with Hispanic immigrants.
Logged
dudeabides
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,375
Tuvalu
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 29, 2015, 09:18:55 PM »

Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 29, 2015, 10:21:54 PM »

It's hard to predict what a Clinton-Trump race would look like; it could be anything from a 2012-esque election or a major Clinton landslide.
Logged
EliteLX
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,037
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.64, S: 0.85

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 29, 2015, 11:34:45 PM »


Come on now, let's not lie to ourselves. Atlas undermines the percentage of angry right-leaning or independent or politically-sick 35+ year olds.

Here's trump's worst realistic Tuesday, Nov 8 (Atlas maps are a bi*ch to put together, deal w/ it.)Sad

Logged
RR1997
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,997
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 31, 2015, 05:30:18 PM »

Dudeabides, why would Trump lose Kentucky and West Virginia? I'm no fan of Trump, but he would DOMINATE Applachia. He's the perfect fit for the region. His fiscally moderate/socially conservative/anti-immigration rhetoric would be loved by most in the region (especially amongst working-class whites). The states of KY and WV would also trend heavily towards Trump as well.
Logged
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 31, 2015, 06:02:58 PM »

My guess:

Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 31, 2015, 06:08:04 PM »

What will the trend map look like? I assume Southwestern states will trend Democratic from increased Hispanic turnout and working-class white states will trend Republican. Something like this, maybe?



So Trump carries PA, Wisconsin, NH, and Minnesota per that map?  Unless you are assuming that the swing is so anti Trump, that it swamps the trend. Whatever.
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,990
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 31, 2015, 09:00:58 PM »

Trump would be a disaster. He would win no more working class whites than Romney and get smoked with educated whites. Florida probably goes blue by more than the national vote, considering Obama only won 60% Hispanics and still took state.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 31, 2015, 11:00:57 PM »

I see no reason why the Northeast would trend toward Trump at all
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 31, 2015, 11:09:35 PM »

Trump would be a disaster. He would win no more working class whites than Romney and get smoked with educated whites. Florida probably goes blue by more than the national vote, considering Obama only won 60% Hispanics and still took state.

Trump would do better than Romney.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,732
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 01, 2015, 01:04:03 AM »

I see no reason why the Northeast would trend toward Trump at all

Well, some states must trend Republican in every election, and it certainly isn't going to be the South or the West. What areas do you see Trump doing relatively better in, compared to the national swing?
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 01, 2015, 10:12:11 AM »

I see no reason why the Northeast would trend toward Trump at all

Well, some states must trend Republican in every election, and it certainly isn't going to be the South or the West. What areas do you see Trump doing relatively better in, compared to the national swing?

I don't think any region needs to see a significant Republican trend with Trump on the ballot. A good prediction shouldn't assume an even split between states trending GOP and states trending D. It should evaluate each region individually, and Trump is a terrible fit for the northeast.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,732
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 01, 2015, 01:01:36 PM »

I see no reason why the Northeast would trend toward Trump at all

Well, some states must trend Republican in every election, and it certainly isn't going to be the South or the West. What areas do you see Trump doing relatively better in, compared to the national swing?

I don't think any region needs to see a significant Republican trend with Trump on the ballot. A good prediction shouldn't assume an even split between states trending GOP and states trending D. It should evaluate each region individually, and Trump is a terrible fit for the northeast.

No. In every election, roughly half of the states trend D and half trend R. Remember we're talking about trend not swing. In 2012, 23 states trended D and 27 states trended R. In 2008, 28 states trended D and 22 trended Republican. In 2004, it was also 28 D and 22 R. Unless Trump were to overwhelmingly win a large state like California, we can reasonably assume at least 20 states will trend Republican, and at least 20 Democratic.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 12 queries.