Opinion of Muammar Gaddafi

[Intell]

Vote.

[/]

HP, needless to say.

[H. Ross Peron]

Massive HP (Normal, sane etc.)

[Illuminati Blood Drinker]

Utterly, utterly vile.

[DavidB.]

The fact that all the realistic alternatives seem to be worse doesn't excuse any of his crimes. HP.

[Oldiesfreak1854]

HP (normal).

[Zioneer]

Lunatic dictator, though like all long-lasting dictators, he had some okay reforms at the beginning.

[The Free North]

HP

Horrible flag designs.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

It was a mistake to remove him. A serious mistake.

[Cory]

The Golden King of Africa.

[Bigby]

HP

Horrible flag designs.

It's not easy being green.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

It was a mistake to remove him. A serious mistake.

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

I have gotten many days worth of enjoyment just by playing the Wikipedia pronunciation of his name. A+, would FF (Fight Freedom?) again.

[Zioneer]

It was a mistake to remove him. A serious mistake.

I would argue that it was the best thing to do, considering he was going to basically burn the rebel-controlled towns to the ground and slaughter thousands of his own people (or so he threatened), far more than have died in a Gaddafi-less world.

The problem the US made was not following up and contributing support to the secular-ish types and forcing the Islamists to back down.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Putting an end to that mass murderer is yet another wonderful accomplishment of Barack Obama.

[bagelman]

He was a jerk.

[ingemann]

Nice to see so many people love a rapist, mass murder and torturer, who both supported terrorism on large scale and invaded one of his neighbours. He was pure scum and the world is brighter place without him.

[Frozen Sky Ever Why]

The support for Gaddafi is almost universal on Youtube. Go on every video and there's hardly a negative comment about him.

[🦀🎂🦀🎂]

The support for Gaddafi is almost universal on Youtube. Go on every video and there's hardly a negative comment about him.

Oh, well, if YouTube commentators say so, then...

[Illuminati Blood Drinker]

The support for Gaddafi is almost universal on Youtube. Go on every video and there's hardly a negative comment about him.

That is literally the worst demographic you could cite, dude.

[Frozen Sky Ever Why]

The support for Gaddafi is almost universal on Youtube. Go on every video and there's hardly a negative comment about him.

That is literally the worst demographic you could cite, dude.

Various demographics use Youtube. The site is overwhelmingly leftist/progressive, much more united in political opinion.

[Intell]

The support for Gaddafi is almost universal on Youtube. Go on every video and there's hardly a negative comment about him.

That is literally the worst demographic you could cite, dude.

Various demographics use Youtube. The site is overwhelmingly leftist/progressive, much more united in political opinion.

Not Necessarily, I see the fair share of christian fundamentalists and far-rightists.

[The Last Northerner]

It was a mistake to remove him. A serious mistake.

I would argue that it was the best thing to do, considering he was going to basically burn the rebel-controlled towns to the ground and slaughter thousands of his own people (or so he threatened), far more than have died in a Gaddafi-less world.

The problem the US made was not following up and contributing support to the secular-ish types and forcing the Islamists to back down.

Like in Iraq?

Putting an end to that mass murderer is yet another wonderful accomplishment of Barack Obama.

Would you say the same if Bush did it? I somehow doubt it.

HP regardless.

[Goldwater]

Massive HP (Normal, sane etc.)

[Zioneer]

It was a mistake to remove him. A serious mistake.

I would argue that it was the best thing to do, considering he was going to basically burn the rebel-controlled towns to the ground and slaughter thousands of his own people (or so he threatened), far more than have died in a Gaddafi-less world.

The problem the US made was not following up and contributing support to the secular-ish types and forcing the Islamists to back down.

Like in Iraq?

Putting an end to that mass murderer is yet another wonderful accomplishment of Barack Obama.

Would you say the same if Bush did it? I somehow doubt it.

HP regardless.

The difference with Iraq is that we ignored the rebels the first time, and then when we finally got rid of Saddam in the second war, there wasn't really any rebel forces we could have supported. We just went in and attacked, essentially. At least in Libya there was a clear, non-Gaddafi opposition that at least appeared democratic.