Could Fiorina put California into play?

[100% pro-life no matter what]

FIorina is pro-choice, and she will lose some Evangelicals to simply not voting for President or voting for a protest 3rd party candidate.   I don't see her as the kind of social liberal to get enough votes in CA to switch from the Democrats to her, pro-choice or not.

Let's pretend for a minute:  Let's say she gets the GOP nomination, social liberalism and all.  That's a big "pretend", but Fiorina will be nominated by the GOP before Bob Casey will be nominated by the Democrats.  Let's say Fiorina were to run as a pro-choice, pro-SSM, Kim-Davis-Needs-To-Follow-The-Law Republican with a standard Business Republican economic agenda.  Are there enough Democrats in states like CA, NY, etc. who would vote for a socially liberal Republican with a conservative economic agenda that would move the electoral map?

Fiorina is not pro-choice.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

FIorina is pro-choice, and she will lose some Evangelicals to simply not voting for President or voting for a protest 3rd party candidate.   I don't see her as the kind of social liberal to get enough votes in CA to switch from the Democrats to her, pro-choice or not.

So pro choice that she invented a total lie about there being live fetuses in the Planned Parenthood videos?

[Maxwell]

FIorina is pro-choice, and she will lose some Evangelicals to simply not voting for President or voting for a protest 3rd party candidate.   I don't see her as the kind of social liberal to get enough votes in CA to switch from the Democrats to her, pro-choice or not.

Let's pretend for a minute:  Let's say she gets the GOP nomination, social liberalism and all.  That's a big "pretend", but Fiorina will be nominated by the GOP before Bob Casey will be nominated by the Democrats.  Let's say Fiorina were to run as a pro-choice, pro-SSM, Kim-Davis-Needs-To-Follow-The-Law Republican with a standard Business Republican economic agenda.  Are there enough Democrats in states like CA, NY, etc. who would vote for a socially liberal Republican with a conservative economic agenda that would move the electoral map?

Fiorina is not pro-choice.

That's one of the main things about her - she's definitively pro-life.

[Fuzzy Bear]

FIorina is pro-choice, and she will lose some Evangelicals to simply not voting for President or voting for a protest 3rd party candidate.   I don't see her as the kind of social liberal to get enough votes in CA to switch from the Democrats to her, pro-choice or not.

Let's pretend for a minute:  Let's say she gets the GOP nomination, social liberalism and all.  That's a big "pretend", but Fiorina will be nominated by the GOP before Bob Casey will be nominated by the Democrats.  Let's say Fiorina were to run as a pro-choice, pro-SSM, Kim-Davis-Needs-To-Follow-The-Law Republican with a standard Business Republican economic agenda.  Are there enough Democrats in states like CA, NY, etc. who would vote for a socially liberal Republican with a conservative economic agenda that would move the electoral map?

Fiorina is not pro-choice.

I have heard that she was.  If she changed for this race alone, that's not going to help.

[Nyvin]

FIorina is pro-choice, and she will lose some Evangelicals to simply not voting for President or voting for a protest 3rd party candidate.   I don't see her as the kind of social liberal to get enough votes in CA to switch from the Democrats to her, pro-choice or not.

Let's pretend for a minute:  Let's say she gets the GOP nomination, social liberalism and all.  That's a big "pretend", but Fiorina will be nominated by the GOP before Bob Casey will be nominated by the Democrats.  Let's say Fiorina were to run as a pro-choice, pro-SSM, Kim-Davis-Needs-To-Follow-The-Law Republican with a standard Business Republican economic agenda.  Are there enough Democrats in states like CA, NY, etc. who would vote for a socially liberal Republican with a conservative economic agenda that would move the electoral map?

   

Fiorina is definitely not Pro-choice....

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

FIorina is pro-choice, and she will lose some Evangelicals to simply not voting for President or voting for a protest 3rd party candidate.   I don't see her as the kind of social liberal to get enough votes in CA to switch from the Democrats to her, pro-choice or not.

Let's pretend for a minute:  Let's say she gets the GOP nomination, social liberalism and all.  That's a big "pretend", but Fiorina will be nominated by the GOP before Bob Casey will be nominated by the Democrats.  Let's say Fiorina were to run as a pro-choice, pro-SSM, Kim-Davis-Needs-To-Follow-The-Law Republican with a standard Business Republican economic agenda.  Are there enough Democrats in states like CA, NY, etc. who would vote for a socially liberal Republican with a conservative economic agenda that would move the electoral map?

Fiorina is not pro-choice.

That's one of the main things about her - she's definitively pro-life.

let's not use the word "pro-life" to describe ms. ww3

[Senate Minority Leader Lord Voldemort]

California hates Carly. Twelve point loss in Senate race during monumental Republican wave when the polls had it close for most of the cycle.

[TDAS04]

Uh, no.

[heatmaster]

Mehmentum & Torie, is your comfort zone being encroached upon?...aw....that's terrible...We can't be upsetting you nice Democrats....that would be...like...like..so uncool, to actually contemplate California going Republican....After all you guys...like maybe own it and stuff....that's too bad dude😎

[The Mikado]

Mehmentum & Torie, is your comfort zone being encroached upon?...aw....that's terrible...We can't be upsetting you nice Democrats....that would be...like...like..so uncool, to actually contemplate California going Republican....After all you guys...like maybe own it and stuff....that's to bad dude😎

You do realize that if you're really interested in seeing how Carly Fiorina does statewide in California, you don't even need to leave uselectionatlas.org, right?

In 2010, a Republican wave year, no less.

[DrScholl]

The OP thought 2012 would be a huge Romney win. Look how that turned out.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

No, not with Kamela Harris the Dem nominee for Senate.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

The answer is no.

[Figueira]

Maybe the Democrats should try to get Wendy Davis to run. I bet she'll put Texas in play.

[Maxwell]

FIorina is pro-choice, and she will lose some Evangelicals to simply not voting for President or voting for a protest 3rd party candidate.   I don't see her as the kind of social liberal to get enough votes in CA to switch from the Democrats to her, pro-choice or not.

Let's pretend for a minute:  Let's say she gets the GOP nomination, social liberalism and all.  That's a big "pretend", but Fiorina will be nominated by the GOP before Bob Casey will be nominated by the Democrats.  Let's say Fiorina were to run as a pro-choice, pro-SSM, Kim-Davis-Needs-To-Follow-The-Law Republican with a standard Business Republican economic agenda.  Are there enough Democrats in states like CA, NY, etc. who would vote for a socially liberal Republican with a conservative economic agenda that would move the electoral map?

Fiorina is not pro-choice.

I have heard that she was.  If she changed for this race alone, that's not going to help.

You are deeply mistaken, she's always run as a pro-lifer.

[Torie]

Mehmentum & Torie, is your comfort zone being encroached upon?...aw....that's terrible...We can't be upsetting you nice Democrats....that would be...like...like..so uncool, to actually contemplate California going Republican....After all you guys...like maybe own it and stuff....that's too bad dude😎

Honey, I have probably voted for more CA Pubs than the number of months you have graced this planet with your presence.

[Fuzzy Bear]

I guess I blew this one.  Fiorina's more or less pro-life; she does advocate the "rape/incest" exception.

[SNJ1985]

FIorina is pro-choice, and she will lose some Evangelicals to simply not voting for President or voting for a protest 3rd party candidate.   I don't see her as the kind of social liberal to get enough votes in CA to switch from the Democrats to her, pro-choice or not.

So pro choice that she invented a total lie about there being live fetuses in the Planned Parenthood videos?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzMAycMMXp8&feature=youtu.be&t=357

[Mordecai]

Mehmentum & Torie, is your comfort zone being encroached upon?...aw....that's terrible...We can't be upsetting you nice Democrats....that would be...like...like..so uncool, to actually contemplate California going Republican....After all you guys...like maybe own it and stuff....that's too bad dude😎

Honey, I have probably voted for more CA Pubs than the number of months you have graced this planet with your presence.

It's weird seeing you with a D avatar. What made you change?

[Crumpets]

FIorina is pro-choice, and she will lose some Evangelicals to simply not voting for President or voting for a protest 3rd party candidate.   I don't see her as the kind of social liberal to get enough votes in CA to switch from the Democrats to her, pro-choice or not.

So pro choice that she invented a total lie about there being live fetuses in the Planned Parenthood videos?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzMAycMMXp8&feature=youtu.be&t=357

Her quote was

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Two points:

1) The fetus in the film is not the one that's being described by the woman. It's stock footage, and it could just as easily be from a premature birth or a miscarriage. There's no evidence it's from an abortion, let alone one which would be used to harvest tissues.

2) Nobody says to keep it alive to harvest it's brain, and there's no clear heartbeat. In fact, when a woman gets a late-term abortion, they stop the heartbeat chemically before they even begin to remove the fetus - meaning if there were a heartbeat, it would again imply that this is footage from either a miscarriage or premature birth.

[Downnice]

Even if she ran the best possible campaign and the Democratic nominee ran a horrid campaign I say she might get around 45-47% max in the state

in that same scenario, she might be able to put Oregon in play but California is not happening

[ag]

She may, with luck, get 40 or 42%. Though, most likely, she will not do that well.

[TomC]

LMAO

[rbt48]

No, she couldn't carry CA.  But, if she managed to get 40+% of the vote, it would wipe a few million votes off the Democrat's national total compared with 2008 and 2012.  So, this could help foster a GOP popular vote win nationwide.

[pikachu]

4 years ago didn't someone say that Romney would beat Obama 52-48 in CA?