Un-Realigning Elections
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 01:13:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Un-Realigning Elections
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Un-Realigning Elections  (Read 1701 times)
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 28, 2015, 07:17:30 PM »

How many elections have there been in which geopolitical trends have been temporarily (or wholly) reversed?

1976 is by far the easiest one to think of for me.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,644
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2015, 07:25:47 PM »

1992 also for the South
1916 because Republicans thought they had finally regained the inland West over 1900-1908
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2015, 11:20:39 PM »

Yeah, 1992 and to a lesser extent was the last gasp of Southern parochialism matched up with Clinton centrism, building a coalition of traditional Democratic Black voters and swinging whites who voted for Carter/Reagan/Bush. But that faded even there, despite Clinton strengthening in other regions. And it was dead by 2000, largely due to the collapse of the Southern White vote for the Democrats.
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,947
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2015, 09:08:05 AM »

1928 is interesting for how well Hoover did in the South. It was the best election for Republicans in the South since Reconstruction (in part due to Democratic candidate Al Smith's Catholicism), but didn't lead to long-term gains at all for Republicans.
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2015, 05:53:18 PM »

1928 is interesting for how well Hoover did in the South. It was the best election for Republicans in the South since Reconstruction (in part due to Democratic candidate Al Smith's Catholicism), but didn't lead to long-term gains at all for Republicans.

Smith was Catholic... that's why
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 11 queries.