IA: Gravis: Trump 19 Carson 14 Cruz 11 Fiorina 10 Rubio 9 Bush 7
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 07:28:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  IA: Gravis: Trump 19 Carson 14 Cruz 11 Fiorina 10 Rubio 9 Bush 7 		« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IA: Gravis: Trump 19 Carson 14 Cruz 11 Fiorina 10 Rubio 9 Bush 7  (Read 1116 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 01, 2015, 03:55:20 PM »
Report.

Trump 19
Carson 14
Cruz 11
Fiorina 10
Rubio 9
Bush 7
Kasich 3
Paul 2
Huckabee 2
Graham 2
Jindal 2
Christie 1
Santorum 1
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2015, 04:13:34 PM »
Democratic #s there too:
Logged
Bigby
Mod_Libertarian_GOPer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,164
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: 3.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2015, 04:15:03 PM »
Trump under 20?

I want to habeeb, but it's Gravis.
Logged
Volrath50
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 814
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2015, 04:40:24 PM »
Quote from: Bigby on October 01, 2015, 04:15:03 PM
Trump under 20?

I want to habeeb, but it's Gravis.

That's under 20 with 18% undecided, so more like 23% or so.
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 01, 2015, 04:45:29 PM »
It's Beyond belief that Santorum and Huckabee, the two past Iowa winners, can only garner a total of 3.1% together in the state now. And it's definitely not only because of Carson, as he's not doing all that great there now either. 14% would be a pretty mediocre result any other year and far from winning the state.
Logged
Volrath50
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 814
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 01, 2015, 04:55:35 PM »
Quote from: eric82oslo on October 01, 2015, 04:45:29 PM
It's Beyond belief that Santorum and Huckabee, the two past Iowa winners, can only garner a total of 3.1% together in the state now. And it's definitely not only because of Carson, as he's not doing all that great there now either. 14% would be a pretty mediocre result any other year and far from winning the state.

Well, Santorum was really a vote for "Not Mitt Romney," after all the other not-Romney options had been tried out and failed.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 01, 2015, 04:56:11 PM »
Gotta love/hate that top 4.
Logged
A Perez
Rookie
**
Posts: 231
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 01, 2015, 04:57:22 PM »
This piece of sh**t pollster doesn't even say when the poll was conducted. We aren't even given the date the poll report was released. Then again, Gravis sucks and we all know it.
Logged
mds32
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,090
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 01, 2015, 06:26:52 PM »
Quote from: A Perez on October 01, 2015, 04:57:22 PM
This piece of sh**t pollster doesn't even say when the poll was conducted. We aren't even given the date the poll report was released. Then again, Gravis sucks and we all know it.
Please. PPP tried to bury its Iowa Results last week. That is just sucky period.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 01, 2015, 08:34:01 PM »
Quote from: eric82oslo on October 01, 2015, 04:45:29 PM
It's Beyond belief that Santorum and Huckabee, the two past Iowa winners, can only garner a total of 3.1% together in the state now. And it's definitely not only because of Carson, as he's not doing all that great there now either. 14% would be a pretty mediocre result any other year and far from winning the state.

Cruz is also running for the evangelicals, so that probably accounts for it.
Logged
A Perez
Rookie
**
Posts: 231
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 02, 2015, 09:17:28 AM »
Quote from: mds32 on October 01, 2015, 06:26:52 PM
Quote from: A Perez on October 01, 2015, 04:57:22 PM
This piece of sh**t pollster doesn't even say when the poll was conducted. We aren't even given the date the poll report was released. Then again, Gravis sucks and we all know it.
Please. PPP tried to bury its Iowa Results last week. That is just sucky period.
PPP always posts the dates.
Logged
mds32
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,090
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 02, 2015, 01:33:17 PM »
Quote from: A Perez on October 02, 2015, 09:17:28 AM
Quote from: mds32 on October 01, 2015, 06:26:52 PM
Quote from: A Perez on October 01, 2015, 04:57:22 PM
This piece of sh**t pollster doesn't even say when the poll was conducted. We aren't even given the date the poll report was released. Then again, Gravis sucks and we all know it.
Please. PPP tried to bury its Iowa Results last week. That is just sucky period.
PPP always posts the dates.

Notice they didn't post the MOE or the # of respondents in that poll.mso no one could add it to the averages.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.