The Greatest Empire?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 10:52:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  The Greatest Empire?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Who had the Greatest Empire?
#1
The Romans
 
#2
The British
 
#3
Other (*must* specify)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 91

Author Topic: The Greatest Empire?  (Read 7927 times)
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,035
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 02, 2015, 12:47:34 AM »
« edited: October 02, 2015, 01:10:15 AM by Blue3 »

Who had the Greatest Empire?

I did a similar poll a long time ago here, and the Romans and British came out on top, with everyone else I included far behind. The runners-up were the Spanish, Mongols, and Arabs.


When thinking of this, I personally don't just think about the amount of territory controlled.

I think of which empires directly had a long, deep, and widespread impact on the world.
* "Long"... a lasting impact.
* "Deep"... it wasn't a shallow conquest or quasi-colonization, it truly affected the world, and still does.
* "Widespread"... their influence covers a wide area of territory and/or large number of people.
* "Directly"... their influence isn't just some indirect butterfly effect, stuff happened specifically because of them.



Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,358


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2015, 01:47:52 AM »

Romans
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2015, 01:50:04 AM »

Romans (Italian-American).
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2015, 04:29:41 AM »

In terms of size (area and population) it's the British Empire.

In terms of longevity and lasting historial impact (as well as dominating the known world to them), it's easily the Roman Empire.
Logged
Murica!
whyshouldigiveyoumyname?
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,295
Angola


Political Matrix
E: -6.13, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2015, 06:04:01 AM »

The Mongol Empire(normal)
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,097
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2015, 07:33:45 AM »

That's what I was thinking.
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,234
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2015, 08:23:08 AM »

This
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,035
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 02, 2015, 01:02:01 PM »


The Mongols had an indirect impact, but don't seem to have much of a lasting legacy. They conquered an enormous area, but they assimilated into the people they ruled, and none of their governments lasted too long.
Logged
Clarko95 📚💰📈
Clarko95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,590
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -5.61, S: -1.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 02, 2015, 09:00:51 PM »

Ottoman Empire IMO
Logged
2952-0-0
exnaderite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,221


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 02, 2015, 10:23:03 PM »


The Mongols had an indirect impact, but don't seem to have much of a lasting legacy. They conquered an enormous area, but they assimilated into the people they ruled, and none of their governments lasted too long.
Their legacy opened trade routes across the Eurasian landmass. That, in turn, led to heightened interest in European imperial exploration.

But out of these two, the British. To this day, its language and culture is the world's standard. IMO the Chinese Empire (in all its reincarnations until 1911) should be ranked higher than the Roman Empire simply for being far longer lasting, influencing more people to this day, and to some extent still being in existence.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,097
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 02, 2015, 11:42:20 PM »


The Mongols had an indirect impact, but don't seem to have much of a lasting legacy. They conquered an enormous area, but they assimilated into the people they ruled, and none of their governments lasted too long.
.5% of the people on Earth are descendants of Temüjin (Genghis Khan).
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,035
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 03, 2015, 01:04:38 AM »
« Edited: October 03, 2015, 01:06:19 AM by Blue3 »


The Mongols had an indirect impact, but don't seem to have much of a lasting legacy. They conquered an enormous area, but they assimilated into the people they ruled, and none of their governments lasted too long.
.5% of the people on Earth are descendants of Temüjin (Genghis Khan).
And?

That makes his empire the greatest?

What if Gerald Ford is the ancestor of 1% of the world's population in 800 years... does that make him the greatest President?

(Also, isn't everyone with English ancestry basically a descendent of King John?)
Logged
Storebought
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 03, 2015, 05:31:23 AM »

For longevity and breadth, I'd go along with China. Imperial government, with interregnums, lasted 2000 years in China, whereas, even including Byzantium as the legitimate legal successor of the Roman Empire (which I think is misleading after Justinian), Rome/Byzantium lasted "only" 1400 years, the last few centuries as an isolated impoverished city-state.

As far as cultural legacies go, the Roman legacy, outside of the Latin language, was literally forgotten in the west for 800 years after the fall of the western capital, and had to be sought-out and self-consciously revived by Italian lawyers and antiquarians. In China, the cultural legacy sustained in the empire had to be self-consciously forgotten to move past its collapse.

Not to mention, Rome at its height governed 50 million subjects; China and its vassals consistently governed 1/5 of all humans on the planet.

But that is all ancient history.

As far as "modern" post-Columbus colonial empires go, then, obviously, the British Empire is by far the most encompassing and audacious ... in 19th century India alone, ~60,000 British troops and 1000 civil servants effectively occupied a nation of 200 million. And the British Empire was profitable -- in 400 years, the Romans heavily exploited their imperial possessions, but never once managed to make them all profitable.

I'd give the Spanish and the Russian Empires a mention as well for ruthlessness and shamelessness.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,097
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 03, 2015, 07:53:42 AM »

You said they didn't have a lasting legacy, I don't know how much more "lasting" you can get.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Not by itself, but combining it with the Largest Empire in History means it has to be in the running.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
that's just silly
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
no
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 03, 2015, 02:13:45 PM »

British definitely.

They ruled over the greatest land mass of any empire in history.

There was a popular phrase at the height of the British Empire

The sun never sets on the British Empire.

They established a code of laws and a legal system, the basis of which is used in much of the world today, made the English language if not the first language, at least the second language, in much of the world, which as well became the language of business in much of the world.

Their influence is lasting and wide spread. 
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,610
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 04, 2015, 09:18:41 AM »

This thread bears the same relationship to History as aerosol cheese does to actual cheese.
Logged
ingemann
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,226


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 04, 2015, 12:44:19 PM »

I had a hard time deciding between the Romans and Chinese, the British wasn't even on my list. The Chinese on one hand build a empire, which have continued dominated eastern Asia in several thousands yearsd, except for a some intermissions, but while some areas in their neighbourhood adopted the Chinese way of life, they have in general not been very successful in spreading their ideas. The Romans on the other hand lasted shorter, and they only had a complete dominance of their near areas for little more than a millenium. But the modern state follow a template the Romans started, Christianity was romanised and it have followed its structure since that day, for a millenium after the fall of Rome, Latin was the language of learning, science and culture, even today we use it to some extent.

It was why I ended with saying Rome, if we look at the world today, and removed the British Empire and Chinese Empire's influence (outside technology of course), the world would somewhat recognisable, we could not do the same with Rome.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,117
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 04, 2015, 09:02:15 PM »

I went for the Romans.
Although THE empire was pretty powerful, you know the one that struck back, but that was in a galaxy long ago and far away so I don't know if it counts or even if it ever really existed.
The Romans were pretty cool, although you couldn't get much more brutal and cruel.
They all spoke Latin, and let's face it that's way cooler than English, as cool as English is.


"The Romans didn't build the pyramids overnight."
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,097
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 05, 2015, 02:31:20 AM »

This thread bears the same relationship to History as aerosol cheese does to actual cheese.
You could educate us, or make fun.  (or both I suppose)
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,615


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 05, 2015, 02:45:12 AM »

Here's some of the most powerful empires in history:
Chinese (various periods)
British (circa 1900)
Spanish (16th century)
Roman (first couple centuries AD)
Mongolian (1200s)
Umayyad  and Abbasid
French (circa 1900)

The USA and USSR would definitely be on the list if they were empires.

I'd say China wins for raw economic power.

Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,117
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 05, 2015, 01:09:52 PM »

Well, I would argue that the USA is an empire in the sense that it has "colonies", i.e. territories that don't have full rights as citizens. In fact, even DC gets no votes in Congress.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,511
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 05, 2015, 07:14:36 PM »

Well, I would argue that the USA is an empire in the sense that it has "colonies", i.e. territories that don't have full rights as citizens. In fact, even DC gets no votes in Congress.

If we are an empire, we are made distinct by the fact that our empire has virtually no colonies (except the few scattered islands of no importance). 
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,423
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 05, 2015, 07:39:07 PM »


Probably the Han, especially in two of the four criteria you specify, and before you die, probably three of the four.

Given the two options you offer, and not wanting to say "other", I'll go with the Romans.  1100 years is pretty impressive.  Also, there's the language, the alphabet, the twelve tables, concrete, newspapers, welfare, bound books, the calendar, etc.  The Brits, the Spanish, the Americans, and a few others all have major achievements, but none of them really overachieve, so I'll go with the Romans here.  Of course, the Han Empire probably will outshine Rome historically.  If one asked the question every five hundred years starting 3000 years ago, "what is the richest country in the world?" then "China" would be the answer in all but two instances:  1500 (Spain) and 2000 (USA).  My guess is that by 2500 China will be yet again the answer to that question.  Next time offer three choices, and make one of them China.  It probably won't matter what the second and third choices are, because the Han Empire will outrank them all.

Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,035
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 06, 2015, 02:08:22 PM »


Probably the Han, especially in two of the four criteria you specify, and before you die, probably three of the four.

Given the two options you offer, and not wanting to say "other", I'll go with the Romans.  1100 years is pretty impressive.  Also, there's the language, the alphabet, the twelve tables, concrete, newspapers, welfare, bound books, the calendar, etc.  The Brits, the Spanish, the Americans, and a few others all have major achievements, but none of them really overachieve, so I'll go with the Romans here.  Of course, the Han Empire probably will outshine Rome historically.  If one asked the question every five hundred years starting 3000 years ago, "what is the richest country in the world?" then "China" would be the answer in all but two instances:  1500 (Spain) and 2000 (USA).  My guess is that by 2500 China will be yet again the answer to that question.  Next time offer three choices, and make one of them China.  It probably won't matter what the second and third choices are, because the Han Empire will outrank them all.



Like I said, I did have China in my old poll. And the Mongols. And Arabs. And Spanish. Etc.

But the Romans and British were by far the winners. This is round 2.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,155
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 11, 2016, 08:00:57 AM »
« Edited: September 16, 2016, 08:59:31 PM by jaichind »

A Chinese history discussion board I often read had a bunch of contributors come up with this list of top powers per time period.  I agree with most of it.

BC 2700-2650 year: 1 Egypt Third Dynasty, 2 Kish, Uruk 3, 4 Ur
BC 2650-2600 year: 1 Egypt Third Dynasty, 2 Ur, Kish 3, 4 Uruk
BC 2600-2550 year: 1 Egypt Forth Dynasty, 2 Elam, 3 Kish, 4 Uruk
BC 2550-2500 year: 1 Egypt Forth Dynasty, 2 Kish, 3 Lagash, 4 Hamas
BC 2500-2450 year: 1 Egypt Fifth Dynasty, 2 Lagash, 3 Umma, 4 Adab
BC 2450-2400 year: 1 Egypt Fifth Dynasty, 2 Lagash, 3 Uruk, 4 Kish
BC 2400-2350 year: 1 Egypt Firth Dynasty, 2 Akkadian Empire, 3 Umma, 4 Lagash
BC 2350-2300 Year: 1 Akkadian Empire, 2 Egypt Sixth Dynasty, 3 Ebla 3, 4 Ur
BC 2300-2250 year: 1 Akkadian Empire, 2 Egypt Sixth Dynasty, 3  Elam, 4 Mohenjo-daro
BC 2250-2200 Year: 1 Egypt Sixth Dynasty, 2 Akkadian Empire, 3 Elam, 4  Mohenjo-daro
BC 2200-2150 Year: 1 Egypt Ninth Dynasty , 2 Gutian Dynasty, 3 Lagash, 4 Uruk, 5 Mohenjo-daro
BC 2150-2100 Year: 1 Neo-Sumerian Empire, 2 Egypt Tenth Dynasty, 3 Mohenjo-daro, 4 Uruk, 5 Lagash
BC 2100-2050 year: 1 Neo-Sumerian Empire, 2 Egypt Eleventh Dynasty, 3 Egypt Tenth Dynasty, 4 Mohenjo-daro, 5 Elam
BC 2050-2000 year: 1 Egypt Eleventh Dynasty, 2 Elam, 3 Neo-Sumerian Empire, 4 Isin First Dynasty, 5 Mohenjo-daro
BC 2000-1950 year: 1 Egypt Twelfth Dynasty, 2 Isin First Dynasty, 3 Elam, 4 Larsa, 5 Anomarad Kingdom
BC 1950-1900 year: 1 Egypt Twelfth Dynasty, 2 Isin First Dynasty, 3 Larsa, 4 Elam, 5 Anomarad Kingdom
BC 1900-1850 year: 1 Egypt Twelfth Dynasty, 2 Isin First Dynasty, 3 Larsa, 4 Babylon, 5 Eshnunna
BC 1850-1800 year: 1 Egypt Twelfth Dynasty, 2 Larsa, 3 Isin First Dynasty, 4 Babylon, 5 Eshnunna
BC 1800-1750 Year: 1 Babylon, 2 Egypt Thirteenth Dynasty, 3 Assyrian Empire, 4 Elam, 5 Larsa
BC 1750-1700 Year: 1 Babylon, 2 Egypt Thirteenth Dynasty, 3 Sealand Dynasty, 4 Ekallatu, 5 Hittite Empire
BC 1700-1650 Year: 1 Babylon, 2 Egypt Fifteenth Dynasty, 3 Hittite Empire, 4 Knossos, 5 Sealand Dynasty
BC 1650-1600 Year: 1 Babylon, 2 Hittite Empire, 3 Egypt Fifteenth Dynasty, 4 Egypt Seventeenth Dynasty, 5 Knossos
BC 1600-1550 year: 1 Egypt Seventeenth Dynasty, 2 Hittite Empire, 3 Shang Dynasty, 4 Knossos, 5 Sealand Dynasty
BC 1550-1500 year: 1 Egypt Eighteenth Dynasty,  2 Babylon Third Dynasty, 3 Mitanni Kingdom, 4 Hittite Empire, 5 Knossos
BC 1500-1450 year: 1 Egypt Eighteenth Dynasty, 2 Mitanni kingdom, 3 Babylon Third Dynasty, 4 Hittite Empire, 5 Ugarit
BC 1450-1400 year: 1 Egypt Eighteenth Dynasty, 2 Hittite Empire, 3 Mitanni kingdom, 4 Babylon Third Dynasty, 5 Ugarit
BC 1400-1350 year: 1 Egypt Eighteenth Dynasty, 2 Hittite Empire, 3 Babylon Third Dynasty, 4 Assyrian kingdom, 5 Mycenae
BC 1350-1300 year: 1 Hittite Empire, 2 Egypt Eighteenth Dynasty,  3 Assyrian Empire, 4 Babylon Third Dynasty, 5 Mycenae
BC 1300-1250 year: 1 Egypt Nineteenth Dynasty, 2 Hittite Empire, 3 Shang Dynasty, 4 Mycenae, 5 Assyrian Empire
BC 1250-1200 year: 1 Egypt Nineteenth Dynasty, 2 Shang Dynasty, 3 Assyrian Empire, 4 Mycenae, 5 Elam
BC 1200-1150 year: 1 Egypt Twentieth Dynasty, 2 Elam, 3 Shang Dynasty, 4 Babylon Fourth Dynasty, 5 Assyrian Empire
BC 1150-1100 year: 1 Babylon Fourth Dynasty, 2 Egypt Twentieth Dynasty, 3 Shang Dynasty, 4 Elam, 5 Assyrian Empire
BC 1100-1050 year: 1 Assyrian Empire, 2 Shang Dynasty, 3 Egypt Twenty first Dynasty, 4 Babylon Fourth Dynasty, 5 Damascus
BC 1050-1000 year: 1 Chou Dynasty, 2 Egypt Twenty-First Dynasty, 3 Philistines, 4 Damascus, 5 Babylon Fourth Dynasty
BC 1000 - 950 year: 1 Chou Dynasty, 2 Egypt Twenty-First Dynasty, 3 Israel, 4 Tyre, 5 Sidon, 6 Babylon Eighth Dynasty
BC 950 - 900 year: 1 Chou Dynasty, 2  Egypt Twenty-Second Dynasty, 3 Neo-Assyrian Empire, 4 Israel, 5 Tyre, 6 Babylon Ninth dynasty
BC 900 - 850 Year: 1 Neo-Assyrian Empire, 2 Chou Dynasty, 3 Egypt Twenty-Second Dynasty, 4 Tyre, 5 Damascus, 6 Babylon Ninth dynasty
BC 850 - 800 Year: 1 Neo-Assyrian Empire, 2 Chou Dynasty, 3 Urartu, 4 Tyre, 5 Egypt Twenty-Second Dynasty, 6 Damascus
BC 800 - 750 Year: 1 Urartu, 2 Neo-Assyrian Empire, 3 Chou Dynasty, 4 Egypt Twenty-Second Dynasty, 5 Egypt Twenty-Second Dynasty, 6 Babylon Ninth dynasty
BC 750 - 700 Year: 1 Neo-Assyrian Empire, 2 Egypt Twenty-Fifth Dynasty, 3 Urartu, 4 Elam, 5 Duchy of Zheng, 6 Chou Dynasty
BC 700 - 650 Year: 1 Neo-Assyrian Empire, 2 Medes, 3 Duchy of Chi, 4 Egypt Twenty-Fifth Dynasty, 5 Urartu, 6 Kingdom of Chu, 7 Argos, 8 Tyre, 9 Elam, 10 Duchy of Jin, 11 Duchy of Lu, 12 Chalcis, 13 Carthage
BC 650 - 600 year: 1 Medes, 2 Neo-Babylonian Empire, 3 Neo-Assyrian Empire, 4 Egypt Twenty-Six Dynasty 5 Duchy of Jin, 6 Lydia 7 Kingdom of Chu, 8 Lydia, 9 Meroë, 10 Benares, 11 Duke of Chin, 12 Carthage, 13 Megara, 14 Duke of Sung
BC 600 - 550 year: 1 Neo-Babylonian Empire, 2 Medes, 3 Lydia, 4 Egypt Twenty-Six Dynasty, 5 Kingdom of Chu, 6 Duchy of Jin, 7 Kosala, 8 Carthage, 9  Lydia, 10 Magadha, 11 Kush, 12 Cyrene, 13 Duke of Chi, 14 Argos
BC 550 - 500 Year: 1 Persian Empire, 2 Carthage, 3 Duchy of Jin, 4 Magadha, 5 Kosala, 6 Kingdom of Wu, 7 Sparta, 8 Kingdom of Chu, 9 Corinth, 10 Egypt Twenty-Six Dynasty, 11 Athens, 12 Duke of Chi
BC 500 - 450 Year: 1 Persian Empire, 2 Athens, 3 Sparta,  4 Magadha, 5 Syracuse, 6 kingdom of Yue, 7 Carthage, 8 Kingdom of Chu, 9 Meroë, 10 Etrusca, 11 Sheba
BC 450 - 400 Year: 1 Persian Empire, 2 Sparta, 3 Athens, 4 Magadha, 5 Kingdom of Wei, 6 Syracuse, 7 Carthage, 8 Roman Republic, 9 Kingdom of Chu, 10 Thebes, 11 Meroë, 12 Cyrene
BC 400 - 350 year: 1 Persian Empire, 2 Magadha, 3 Carthage, 4 Thebes, 5 Macedonia, 6 Kingdom of Wei, 7 Kingdom of Chi, 8 Roman Republic, 9 Meroë, 10 Odrysian kingdom, 11 Kingdom Chu, 12 Egypt Thirtieth Dynasty, 13 Sparta, 14 Kingdom Chin
350 BC - 300 years: 1 Macedonia, 2 Maurya Empire, 3 Persian Empire, 4 Carthage, 5 Kingdom of Chi, 6 Kingdom of Chin, 7 Roman Republic, 8 Seleucid kingdom, 9 Ptolemaic Kingdom, 10 Aetolian League, 11 Kalinga, 12 Kingdom of Chu, 13 Bosporan Kingdom
BC 300 - 250 Year: 1 Maurya Empire, 2 Seleucid kingdom, 3 Ptolemaic Kingdom, 4 Kingdom of Chin, 5 Roman Republic, 6 Carthage, 7 Macedonia, 8 Kingdom of Chao, 9 Aetolian League, 10 Epirus, 11 Meroë, 12 Thrace, 13 Kalinga
BC 250 - 200 Year: 1 Maurya Empire, 2 Chin Dynasty, 3 Roman Republic, 4 Seleucid kingdom, 5 Ptolemaic Kingdom, 6 Parthian Empire, 7 Macedonia, 8 Carthage , 9 Xiongnu, 10 Achaean League, 11 Aetolian League, 12 Yuezhi
BC 200 -150 Year: 1 Western Han Dynasty, 2 Roman Republic, 3 Xiongnu, 4 Parthian Empire, 5 Seleucid kingdom, 6 Numidia, 7 Shunga Empire, 8 Ptolemaic Kingdom, 9 Macedonia, 10 Bactria, 11 Meroë, 12 Achaean League, 13 Nanyue
BC 150 -100 Year: 1 Western Han Dynasty, 2 Roman Republic, 3 Parthian Empire, 4 Xiongnu, 5 Numidia, 6 Ptolemaic Kingdom, 7 Seleucid kingdom,  8  Pontus, 9 Indo-Greek Kingdom, 10 Mauritania, 11 Shunga Empire, 12 Meroë
BC 100 - 50 Year: 1 Western Han Dynasty, 2 Roman Republic, 3 Parthian Empire, 4 Xiongnu, 5 Armenia, 6 Ptolemaic Kingdom, 7 Dacia, 8 Mauritania, 9 Meroë, 10 Wusun, 11 Nabataean Kingdom, 12 Kanva dynasty
BC 50 - 1 Year: 1 Western Han Dynasty 2 Roman Empire, 3 Parthian Empire, 4 Xiongnu, 5 Andhra, 6 Mauritania, 7 Meroë, 8 Kingdom of Judah, 9 Britian, 10 Ptolemaic Kingdom, 11 Armenia
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.069 seconds with 14 queries.