Gun nuts protest Obama's visit to Oregon victims families

[Landslide Lyndon]

Why don't these "people" just go DIAF?

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/obama-roseburg-shooting-armed-protesters


Gun-toting protesters gathered on Friday morning to await President Obama's arrival in Roseburg, Ore., where he planned to meet with the families of victims of last week's mass shooting at Umpqua Community College.

But local residents planned to protest Obama's visit, saying he rushed to "politicize" the tragedy by pushing a gun control agenda.

"My family, my friends, everybody down here is not happy about him coming," Michelle Finn, a Umpqua alumna and Roseburg native, told the Oregonian. "He already says he's going to politicize this — he's already going to push his agenda."

A Facebook event page for a protest dubbed "Defend Roseburg - Deny barack 0bama" [sic], had garnered more than 8,000 RVSPs by Friday. In its lengthy event description, organizers suggested attendees carry a handgun as opposed to a rifle, but reiterated "you have the right to carry what you wish."

[DrScholl]

Why don't these "people" just go DIAF?

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/obama-roseburg-shooting-armed-protesters


Gun-toting protesters gathered on Friday morning to await President Obama's arrival in Roseburg, Ore., where he planned to meet with the families of victims of last week's mass shooting at Umpqua Community College.

But local residents planned to protest Obama's visit, saying he rushed to "politicize" the tragedy by pushing a gun control agenda.

"My family, my friends, everybody down here is not happy about him coming," Michelle Finn, a Umpqua alumna and Roseburg native, told the Oregonian. "He already says he's going to politicize this — he's already going to push his agenda."

A Facebook event page for a protest dubbed "Defend Roseburg - Deny barack 0bama" [sic], had garnered more than 8,000 RVSPs by Friday. In its lengthy event description, organizers suggested attendees carry a handgun as opposed to a rifle, but reiterated "you have the right to carry what you wish."

If she didn't lose anyone in the shooting, who really cares what her friends and family are not happy about? The me, me, me attitude gun nuts have is pathetic.

[King]

I like how quickly the latch onto meme words. "Politicize."

Love it.

[bore]

I can't remember who it was who said it (someone in IRC I think) but [sic] is the sickest burn anyone can make.

[Free Bird]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

They have the right to show how disconnected from reality and human decency that they are.

[Free Bird]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

They have the right to show how disconnected from reality and human decency that they are.

Define their disconnect.

[Classic Conservative]

Good for them.

[The Other Castro]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

They have the right to make themselves look like horrible people, just as we have the right to acknowledge them as horrible people.

[Free Bird]

If anything, they're in the right for not wanting him exploiting this tragedy to go for their town and push for more gun control that won't work.

[ElectionsGuy]

Oh no! Protesters. It's certainly OK to protest for police reform, but not to stop gun control!

[Taco Truck 🚚]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

If the only defense you have for your behavior is The Constitution then you are probably a low life f-ck.

[Free Bird]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

If the only defense you have for your behavior is The Constitution then you are probably a low life f-ck.

Nope that's you for tossing aside our founding document and calling that a weak defense.

[🦀🎂🦀🎂]

Hiding behind a piece of paper is lame.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Why doesn't the OP DIAF?

[Free Bird]

Hiding behind a piece of paper is lame.

If it's the lifeblood of your country then not really

[Taco Truck 🚚]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

If the only defense you have for your behavior is The Constitution then you are probably a low life f-ck.

Nope that's you for tossing aside our founding document and calling that a weak defense.

The Constitution is a back stop.  It is the lowest common denominator.  It is what remains when all else fails.  It is what allows NeoNazis to march in Skokie.  If all you have is The Constitution to back up your argument then you are probably a low life f-ck.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

If the only defense you have for your behavior is The Constitution then you are probably a low life f-ck.

Nope that's you for tossing aside our founding document and calling that a weak defense.

The Constitution is a back stop.  It is the lowest common denominator.  It is what remains when all else fails.  It is what allows NeoNazis to march in Skokie.  If all you have is The Constitution to back up your argument then you are probably a low life f-ck.

Like or despise NeoNazis, yes, they have a right to march in Skokie. And a right to be roughed up by the residents of Skokie.

[Landslide Lyndon]

Oh no! Protesters. It's certainly OK to protest for police reform, but not to stop gun control!

They can protest all they want. And we can call them the human scum that they are.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Fred Phelps agrees with you.

[Taco Truck 🚚]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

If the only defense you have for your behavior is The Constitution then you are probably a low life f-ck.

Nope that's you for tossing aside our founding document and calling that a weak defense.

The Constitution is a back stop.  It is the lowest common denominator.  It is what remains when all else fails.  It is what allows NeoNazis to march in Skokie.  If all you have is The Constitution to back up your argument then you are probably a low life f-ck.

Like or despise NeoNazis, yes, they have a right to march in Skokie. And a right to be roughed up by the residents of Skokie.

You don't make any sense.

[Free Bird]

Oh no! Protesters. It's certainly OK to protest for police reform, but not to stop gun control!

They can protest all they want. And we can call them the human scum that they are.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Fred Phelps agrees with you.

He had the right to do so.

[Free Bird]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

If the only defense you have for your behavior is The Constitution then you are probably a low life f-ck.

Nope that's you for tossing aside our founding document and calling that a weak defense.

The Constitution is a back stop.  It is the lowest common denominator.  It is what remains when all else fails.  It is what allows NeoNazis to march in Skokie.  If all you have is The Constitution to back up your argument then you are probably a low life f-ck.

Like or despise NeoNazis, yes, they have a right to march in Skokie. And a right to be roughed up by the residents of Skokie.

You don't make any sense.

Nope that's you. If you're on a forum to discuss predominately American politics, you should at least respect the document that rules the land and created the process in discussion. I don't understand how respecting your country's principles makes you a lowlife.

[Taco Truck 🚚]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

If the only defense you have for your behavior is The Constitution then you are probably a low life f-ck.

Nope that's you for tossing aside our founding document and calling that a weak defense.

The Constitution is a back stop.  It is the lowest common denominator.  It is what remains when all else fails.  It is what allows NeoNazis to march in Skokie.  If all you have is The Constitution to back up your argument then you are probably a low life f-ck.

Like or despise NeoNazis, yes, they have a right to march in Skokie. And a right to be roughed up by the residents of Skokie.

You don't make any sense.

Nope that's you. If you're on a forum to discuss predominately American politics, you should at least respect the document that rules the land and created the process in discussion. I don't understand how respecting your country's principles makes you a lowlife.

Never said that.  Reading comprehension.  I said if that is your ONLY defense then you are probably a low life f-ck.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

If the only defense you have for your behavior is The Constitution then you are probably a low life f-ck.

Nope that's you for tossing aside our founding document and calling that a weak defense.

The Constitution is a back stop.  It is the lowest common denominator.  It is what remains when all else fails.  It is what allows NeoNazis to march in Skokie.  If all you have is The Constitution to back up your argument then you are probably a low life f-ck.

Like or despise NeoNazis, yes, they have a right to march in Skokie. And a right to be roughed up by the residents of Skokie.

You don't make any sense.

Being mature enough to not want to silence opponents doesn't make sense?                    

[Taco Truck 🚚]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

If the only defense you have for your behavior is The Constitution then you are probably a low life f-ck.

Nope that's you for tossing aside our founding document and calling that a weak defense.

The Constitution is a back stop.  It is the lowest common denominator.  It is what remains when all else fails.  It is what allows NeoNazis to march in Skokie.  If all you have is The Constitution to back up your argument then you are probably a low life f-ck.

Like or despise NeoNazis, yes, they have a right to march in Skokie. And a right to be roughed up by the residents of Skokie.

You don't make any sense.

Being mature enough to not want to silence opponents doesn't make sense?                    

If your only defense for your behavior is The Constitution you are probably a low life f-ck.  How can I make this any clearer?