Canada General Discussion: Trudeau II (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:18:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Canada General Discussion: Trudeau II (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Does uniting the right in Alberta mean the NDP is toast next election?
#1
Absolutely they are done like dinner
 
#2
NDP still might win, but will be a steep hill to climb
 
#3
NDP will likely win, UCP too extreme
 
#4
NDP will definitely win
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 30

Author Topic: Canada General Discussion: Trudeau II  (Read 190552 times)
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,145


« on: April 08, 2016, 09:02:52 PM »

I finally got around to reading the "leap manifesto". It's actually less radical than I expected from media depictions: higher, more progressive taxes, no new pipelines, public transit, indigenous rights, etc. But it's not really anti-capitalist, at least in its specific proposals.

But I guess it fits a certain narrative about the NDP to have a bunch of radical leftists fighting the leadership.
Logged
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,145


« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2016, 07:27:40 PM »


Stepping down from cabinet I understand - but leaving the caucus, to sit as an independent, for addiction treatment? That seems weird. I would not be surprised at all if there turns out to be more to this than has been announced.
Logged
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,145


« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2017, 10:30:24 AM »

Looking through old results, I noticed that the Greens put up great results federally and provincially in Dufferin-Caledon and Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound in the mid 2000's. What was going there? Rural Ontario is not the sort of place where you'd think the Greens would do well.

There is a bit of a hippy scene in this part of the province, (or post-hippy, like organic farming, "artisanal" shops, you know what I mean), even if it's a minority under the surface of typical rural conservatism. Mind you, the way the Greens briefly became the "strategic" progressive party in Bruce-Grey-Owen-Sound was still kind of weird and I don't entirely understand it; the area isn't that green.

A lot of it has to do with the hilly terrain along the Niagara escarpment which is pretty for tourists but not that great for commercial farming: you can see the idea on a topographic map:

Logged
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,145


« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2018, 08:04:39 PM »


Haha
Logged
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,145


« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2018, 09:42:26 PM »

The issue that might lead such a party to take off is immigration. On economic issues, there's little appetite for a party to the right of Scheer's Conservatives. Most normal people don't care about supply management. But a large slice of the population is more hostile to immigration and multiculturalism than the leadership of all the political parties. Bernier is speaking for a lot of people who have felt unrepresented on these issues.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 11 queries.