Conservative Party of Canada Leadership Race Megathread-May 27th 2017
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:36:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Conservative Party of Canada Leadership Race Megathread-May 27th 2017
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 36
Poll
Question: Will some candidates drop out of the race in order to stop O'Leary from winning?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
Maybe
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 18

Author Topic: Conservative Party of Canada Leadership Race Megathread-May 27th 2017  (Read 102253 times)
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #350 on: August 30, 2016, 04:36:53 PM »


Kellie Leitch supposedly has a great campaign organization.  Then there was a story on how Andrew Scheer, if he runs, will have a great organization and will unite the party behind him because he's young and, while being a veteran M.P, won't have the baggage of the Harper years.  Now there is a story on Erin O'Toole saying pretty much the same thing (O'Toole isn't a veteran M.P but was briefly a Cabinet Minister.)

It seems nearly every Conservative running is a front-runner with a great campaign organization.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #351 on: August 30, 2016, 04:45:22 PM »

Leitch has Kouvalis, FWIW.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #352 on: August 31, 2016, 05:07:57 PM »

Clown car keeps growing.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #353 on: August 31, 2016, 05:26:56 PM »


Wonder how many dropouts we'll have before voting time. The Liberals had four in '06.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #354 on: August 31, 2016, 07:04:20 PM »


I think this is further evidence that the Conservatives don't believe Peter MacKay is going to run.  I could also see these M.Ps (and shadow cabinet ministers) looking at running if MacKay doesn't based on their relatively high profiles: James Bezan, Pierre Polievre and Peter Van Loan.

Some might add Michelle Rempel, but given her recent revelation that she is suffering from PTSD stemming from the Ottawa shooting incident I think it would be a bit odd for her to turn around and run for leader.  Also, Rempel is said to be pushing Lisa Raitt to run.

If MacKay doesn't run, it would mean the entire top tier of Conservative successors to Harper decided to take a pass:
1.James Moore
2.Jason Kenney
3.Brad Wall
4.John Baird
5.Jean Charest
6.Bernard Lord
7.Peter MacKay
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #355 on: August 31, 2016, 07:18:44 PM »

The Globe and Mail article also mentioned Adrienne Snow as planning to run.
This is an article on her: http://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/outside-candidate-adrienne-snow-launches-bid-for-tory-leadership/

She seems like a rather nasty piece of work.

I think this is everybody:
Running or Planning to run:
1.Deepak Obhrai
2.Bradley Trost
3.Kellie Leitch
4.Michael Chong
5.Tony Clement
6.Maxime Bernier
7.Pierre Lemieux
8.Adrienne Snow

Considering running:
1.Andrew Scheer
2.Lisa Raitt
3.Erin O'Toole
4.Steven Blaney
5.Peter MacKay
6.Andrew Saxton
7.Rick Peterson
8.Dan Lindsay
9.Kevin O'Leary
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #356 on: September 01, 2016, 05:48:27 AM »

I'd quibble with the size of that 'top-tier' list. If your last experience in politics was losing an election > 5 years ago, I wouldn't call you top tier. Charest and Lord don't belong there.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #357 on: September 01, 2016, 06:23:19 AM »

I'd quibble with the size of that 'top-tier' list. If your last experience in politics was losing an election > 5 years ago, I wouldn't call you top tier. Charest and Lord don't belong there.

They were promoted early on and regarded as being major candidates had they run.  I agree that neither of them made any sense as Conservative Party leadership candidates.

I suspect Charest would have sunk pretty quickly had he got in, but the media at least would have initially treated him as a serious contender.  Lord was promoted as the most senior Conservative who could have run from the Atlantic Provinces after MacKay.

I was also surprised when he was mentioned as a possible candidate.
Logged
DL
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,417
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #358 on: September 01, 2016, 10:38:57 AM »


I think this is further evidence that the Conservatives don't believe Peter MacKay is going to run.  I could also see these M.Ps (and shadow cabinet ministers) looking at running if MacKay doesn't based on their relatively high profiles: James Bezan, Pierre Polievre and Peter Van Loan.


I'm not so sure about that. For the moment no one knows if McKay will run or not and so it doesnt do anyone any harm to muse about running and getting a bit of publicity so that if McKay does NOT run - they already have a teeny bit of name recognition. Keep in mind that you need to pay $100,000 to enter the race, so I have a feeling that many of the people talking about running right now are either floating trial balloons or are stalking horses for someone else or just want a bit of free publicity.

I say show me the money! Until someone is seriously ready to pony up $100k - I don't take them seriously
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #359 on: September 01, 2016, 10:59:57 AM »


I think this is further evidence that the Conservatives don't believe Peter MacKay is going to run.  I could also see these M.Ps (and shadow cabinet ministers) looking at running if MacKay doesn't based on their relatively high profiles: James Bezan, Pierre Polievre and Peter Van Loan.


I'm not so sure about that. For the moment no one knows if McKay will run or not and so it doesnt do anyone any harm to muse about running and getting a bit of publicity so that if McKay does NOT run - they already have a teeny bit of name recognition. Keep in mind that you need to pay $100,000 to enter the race, so I have a feeling that many of the people talking about running right now are either floating trial balloons or are stalking horses for someone else or just want a bit of free publicity.

I say show me the money! Until someone is seriously ready to pony up $100k - I don't take them seriously

Good point DL. I hadn't thought about that. If we narrow the field to candidates who actually have put up the money only Bernier, Chong, Clement and Leitch are in.

Who else will put up? I figure at least one socon (probably Trost, maybe Scheer if I'm lucky Tongue), another red Tory (MacKay or Raitt?), and maybe 1-2 random fillers (think Martin Singh).
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #360 on: September 01, 2016, 11:16:33 AM »


I think this is further evidence that the Conservatives don't believe Peter MacKay is going to run.  I could also see these M.Ps (and shadow cabinet ministers) looking at running if MacKay doesn't based on their relatively high profiles: James Bezan, Pierre Polievre and Peter Van Loan.


I'm not so sure about that. For the moment no one knows if McKay will run or not and so it doesnt do anyone any harm to muse about running and getting a bit of publicity so that if McKay does NOT run - they already have a teeny bit of name recognition. Keep in mind that you need to pay $100,000 to enter the race, so I have a feeling that many of the people talking about running right now are either floating trial balloons or are stalking horses for someone else or just want a bit of free publicity.

I say show me the money! Until someone is seriously ready to pony up $100k - I don't take them seriously

Good point DL. I hadn't thought about that. If we narrow the field to candidates who actually have put up the money only Bernier, Chong, Clement and Leitch are in.

Who else will put up? I figure at least one socon (probably Trost, maybe Scheer if I'm lucky Tongue), another red Tory (MacKay or Raitt?), and maybe 1-2 random fillers (think Martin Singh).

Yes, that is a good point.  I see that is the difference between those who are actually running and those who have announced their intention to run.

Also:
1.Peter MacKay is NOT a red Tory.  Just because he chose, clearly as a flag of convenience, to run for the Progressive Conservatives does not make him a red Tory.  He never held an economic portfolio, so I don't know what his fiscal policies would be, but he was as ardent a social conservative as Kellie Leitch if not Brad Trost.

2.Why have Martin Singh when you can have Ryan Cleary, clearly?
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #361 on: September 01, 2016, 11:53:41 AM »
« Edited: September 02, 2016, 11:53:20 AM by 🍁 Hatman »


I think his point was that someone a la Martin Singh who noone has ever heard of could pony up the cash for a run.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #362 on: September 02, 2016, 10:56:14 AM »

Leitch should get outta the race now.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #363 on: September 02, 2016, 12:27:11 PM »
« Edited: September 02, 2016, 12:40:12 PM by Adam T »


Oh, I see.  I thought he was saying that Martin Singh was now backing the Conservative Party.  Still, as lame as my response was, I thought people here would cleary clearly see it was a joke.  Not a funny joke, but still a joke.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #364 on: September 02, 2016, 12:34:40 PM »


She's giving the same response as she gave to Rosie Barton when she first got into the race.  I like it that some Conservatives (and conservatives) think she would make a better Prime Minister than Justin Trudeau because she's a medical doctor (or a specialist) while Trudeau was nothing but a 'part time drama teacher' or nothing but a 'ski instructor,'  even though Trudeau rarely ever says anything this incoherent while Leitch rarely ever says anything that isn't incoherent.
Logged
King of Kensington
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,068


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #365 on: September 02, 2016, 01:47:12 PM »

Kellie Leitch is the Ben Carson of Canadian politics.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #366 on: September 02, 2016, 02:13:42 PM »

Yeah, I know a conservative who insists on calling her "Dr. Kellie Leitch".  The comparison to Ben Carson is very apt. Maybe we should start calling her "the good doctor"?
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #367 on: September 04, 2016, 08:35:34 AM »


Coming from a religious community that's a bit out of the Canadian mainstream, this scares the crap out of me. I think Leitch will be hugging the bottom of my preferences with Bernier.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #368 on: September 04, 2016, 08:40:41 AM »

So what are people thinking for their ballots, (or hypothetical ballots for non-Tories)? Mine will probably look like:

SoCon protest vote/Serious vote for Scheer if possible
Chong
Clement
Random filler
Bernier
Leitch
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #369 on: September 04, 2016, 08:57:29 AM »

I'm not sure who I should support strategically as a New Democrat, but personally I think Chong is really the only palatable candidate.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #370 on: September 04, 2016, 02:24:45 PM »


Coming from a religious community that's a bit out of the Canadian mainstream, this scares the crap out of me. I think Leitch will be hugging the bottom of my preferences with Bernier.

I wish Bernier would join the Liberal Party, be appointed Minister of Industry (or whatever it has been renamed) and implement all his pro free enterprise policies.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #371 on: September 04, 2016, 02:26:40 PM »

So what are people thinking for their ballots, (or hypothetical ballots for non-Tories)? Mine will probably look like:

SoCon protest vote/Serious vote for Scheer if possible
Chong
Clement
Random filler
Bernier
Leitch

What if Lisa Raitt runs?  She seems to be pretty moderate and a genuinely nice person as well.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #372 on: September 04, 2016, 02:39:22 PM »

Adam: I thought that was Brison's job.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #373 on: September 04, 2016, 03:06:46 PM »

So what are people thinking for their ballots, (or hypothetical ballots for non-Tories)? Mine will probably look like:

SoCon protest vote/Serious vote for Scheer if possible
Chong
Clement
Random filler
Bernier
Leitch

What if Lisa Raitt runs?  She seems to be pretty moderate and a genuinely nice person as well.

She'd be lower than Chong, higher than Bernier and Leitch.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #374 on: September 04, 2016, 05:27:44 PM »


That would be nice, but he's the Treasury Board President.   Navdeep Bains is the Minister for the renamed Industry portfolio.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 36  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.065 seconds with 14 queries.