UK Parliamentary by-elections, 2015 onwards (also devolved legislatures) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 11:36:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK Parliamentary by-elections, 2015 onwards (also devolved legislatures) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: UK Parliamentary by-elections, 2015 onwards (also devolved legislatures)  (Read 86028 times)
Cassius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600


« on: November 22, 2015, 09:47:19 AM »

Apparently Labour's private polling shows them at something like 32% of the vote, which is of course absolutely woeful (it's 23 points lower than what they got in the general election). I would, however, apply the usual caveats about the general poor quality of constituency polling, and would also point out that we've been here before; last year, in Newark, everyone was fretting that the Tories could lose the seat to UKIP, who of course were fresh from their successes in the European elections. In the end, the Tories held the seat by 20 points. I think media types have a tendency to overrate UKIP's chances in things like this.
Logged
Cassius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600


« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2015, 05:11:19 AM »
« Edited: December 04, 2015, 05:13:15 AM by Cassius »

The spin in the press seems to be "Labour win in spite of Corbyn" which is to be expected really.  What has the guy got to do in order to be credited with something?

Well given that Corbyn was apparently barely featured in the Labour campaign, which seemed to centre around its, admittedly very strong, local candidate (one who seems about as un-Corbyn as it's possible to be in the Labour party for that matter), I'm not entirely sure how this can be attributed to Corbyn in any way.

I basically think Labour's good performance and UKIP fizzling is down to three factors. Firstly, as I've already said, Labour ran a very good campaign in the seat with a good candidate; second, Labour strategised well in attempting, as it always does, to maximise the number of people voting by post, which always seems to favour Labour. Finally, UKIP, on spite of all the bluster surrounding their campaign, were too thinly stretched on the ground, and failed to get out a lot of the people who voted for them back in May. Indeed, I suspect that a lot of UKIP's voters this time round actually voted for the Conservatives in the general election, which would explain the (rather predictable) collapse in the Conservative vote.
Logged
Cassius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600


« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2016, 07:33:19 PM »

What seems a little eerie is how the Common death toll over the last few years has been so disproportionately concentrated amongst Labour party MP's.
Logged
Cassius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600


« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2016, 10:17:02 PM »

Zac Goldsmith... you stupid c**nt.
Logged
Cassius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600


« Reply #4 on: February 23, 2017, 04:05:29 PM »

I can't wait for the inevitable 'Labour holds on to Copeland and Stoke with increased majorities' type results... and for the sound of silence from the media clown car.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.