Why Conservatives Love Unqualifed Black Candidates (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 05:39:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Why Conservatives Love Unqualifed Black Candidates (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why Conservatives Love Unqualifed Black Candidates  (Read 6719 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,839
United States


« on: October 30, 2015, 01:58:14 PM »
« edited: October 30, 2015, 03:31:28 PM by pbrower2a »

And liberals have qualified candidates?

Unless you want to call Barack Obama a 'conservative'. He's an above-average President, which is about as good as anyone could ever expect. 

Blacks are more likely to thrive in urban political machines than elsewhere. We have Barack Obama as President in part because the Chicago Machine distrusted him. They wanted him as far from Chicago as he could get, and they got their way. Just imagine him as a prosecutor or a judge. He'd be a nightmare. Aldermen and ward bosses would be going to prison on corruption charges.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,839
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2015, 08:18:45 AM »

It would be interesting to see a discussion of Dr. Carson's positions on the issues. Yes, he's religious, well educated, articulate, and thoughtful. Which of these qualities makes him "unqualified" exactly? I was under the impression that the Constitution specifies whether or not a person is qualified, and by my reading of that document, the qualifications for the office of president are quite simple; a presidential candidate must be (1) a natural born citizen of the United States, (2) a resident for 14 years, and (3) 35 years of age or older. So with this list of requirements, I am unaware of any candidate running for the office of president who would be considered "unqualified", be they black or not.

Perhaps you believe Dr. Carson would not be able to perform one or more of the specific functions a president is called on to do? If so, please indicate which one(s):
  • Sign or veto legislation
  • Act as Commander in Chief of the armed forces
  • Appoint cabinet members and key federal officials
  • Appoint justices to vacant Supreme Court seats
  • Grant pardons and reprieves
  • Negotiate with other countries
  • Influence Congress for specific legislation
  • Work with Congress on budgetary issues

Frankly, I think it would be quite interesting to see what a sharp non-lawyer, non-politician would do in the role. And despite what you may think, the activities that take up any sitting president's day are challenging to be sure, but it 'aint brain surgery...

But would he be a good President? By the enumerated requirements of the Presidency, we could never elect Madeleine Albright -- but we could in theory elect Charles Manson, who fits all the enumerated requirements.

The President has great discretionary powers. The issue is never whether someone can perform the enumerated and informal duties of the President,  but instead how he does them. Nobody can accuse either of the last two Presidents of failing to do the job as President, but the vast majority of Americans believes that one or the other was among the very worst in his choices of what he did.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.