There's only one problem with your underlying premise based on statistics: they're horribly, horribly wrong. The most detailed life expectancy data we have by race
and by state is from
Kaiser in 2010, which shows that blacks have a life expectancy four years lower than whites (74.6 to 78.9, respectively).
The CDC numbers (which don't break it down by state, as far as I know) show life expectancy at birth in 2013 being 79.1 for whites and 75.5 for blacks. The same data-set shows that black male life expectancy at birth in 2013 is 72.3, and white male life expectancy at birth in 2012 is 76.7. Female life expectancy between the two races, however, is at near parity (black females at 78.4; white females at 79.1).
Just to recap:
Gender | Black | White |
Male | 72.3 | 76.7 |
Female | 78.4 | 79.1 |
Total | 75.5 | 79.1 |
You're confusing the recent spike in middle-aged white male deaths with the notion that white male life expectancy is suddenly lower than it is among blacks. Mortality rates for whites as a whole is still lower than for non-whites. A recent spike among one sub-set of whites is not ideal, of course, but that still has not closed the gap between white and black (or white and non-white) mortality rates or life expectancy - let alone reversed it.