These issues, the right to life, low taxes, limited spending, national defense, and the right to bear arms, are, taken in totality, and adequate measure of a candidate's commitment to the conservative movement.
Says who? Surely not the man who consigned us to a veto-proof pro-TNF socialist majority.
What about protecting regional sovereignty, preserving the independence of the judiciary from butthurt radicals mad because they got cockbloced by the court, and opposing tyranncial excesses of the executive branch?
sbane is a pro-choice, tax raising moderate, but he has done more to protect critical checks on gov't tyranny then your IRC friends, many of whom were the ones out to destroy them. He actually helped to balance the budget as Senator. That counts a lot in my book.
Yes, I am pro-life, pro-gun, support keeping the budget reasonable w/ taxes as low as practical, securing the borders and a strong national defense. At the same time I support background checks, immigration in general, oppose foreign interventionism (and waste in the Pentagon), oppose the war on drugs, and think we shouldn't be leaving poor people to die in the streets from lack of healthcare. I also think we should strive to minimize damage to the environment.
Conservatism is not about checking off boxes on some list from 1985, it is about a values set that values both freedom and the institutions that protect it, whether it be the military or the independent judiciary.
Right now the biggest priority facing this game is saving it from the crazed radicals who will stop at nothing to destroy it. I will push for Conservative principles where I can, like with the education bill I just introduced and the abortion bill I am presently working on with a colleague, but I will not win a misguided battle only to lose the war. The game and its survival and reform shall come first, Riley.