Rubio: Paris Attacks were a "positive development" for my campaign

[Lief 🗽]

https://twitter.com/JoeSudbay/status/668466821482323968

Is this guy a f[inks]ing psychopath?!

At the very least he's #NotReadyForPrimetime

[they don't love you like i love you]

RIP Rubio

[RR1997]

Lol

Of course a low-energy, race-traitor, xenophobe like Rubio posts something that is incredibly phsychopathic and offensive. I can't wait to see TRUMP dominate this loser during the next debate.

[Lief 🗽]

Lol

Of course a low-energy, race-traitor, xenophobe like Rubio posts something that incredibly phsychopathic and offensive. I can't wait to see TRUMP dominate this loser during the next debate.

It really does seems that when Rubio isn't regurgitating pre-scripted lines that his billionaire donor puppetmasters have written for him, he's just completely lost.

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

Rubio is a psychopath and quite possibly a masochist...

[they don't love you like i love you]

Rubio is a psychopath and quite possibly a masochist...

You also list him as your #3 choice in your signature.

[Asian Nazi]

Rubio is a psychopath and quite possibly a masochist...

You also list him as your #3 choice in your signature.

lol

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

Rubio is a psychopath and quite possibly a masochist...

You also list him as your #3 choice in your signature.

Doesn't mean I don't like him.

[Xing]

Best Republican candidate since Reagan, right guys?

[madelka]

Is there any GOP candidate left who can beat the Democrats next year?

[ProudModerate2]

... posts something that is incredibly phsychopathic and offensive.

Maybe, you are just confused. You must be talking about Trump .... or Carson ?

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

Is there any GOP candidate left who can beat the Democrats next year?

Jim Webb can...when he finally realizes his true home is the GOP after the Democrats swung hard left.

[I support Sanders]

Rubio was simply saying that a positive development to result from the attacks was  that it might make the U.S. take the threat of terrorism more seriously. I disagree with Rubio, and think the U.S. has already traded too much security for liberty in the War on Terror, but let's keep this in context. He never said the attacks were good for his campaign.

[Holmes]

Rubio was simply saying that a positive development to result from the attacks was  that it might make the U.S. take the threat of terrorism more seriously. I disagree with Rubio, and think the U.S. has already traded too much security for liberty in the War on Terror, but let's keep this in context. He never said the attacks were good for his campaign.

It's a damning soundbite, and it will be used in a "in case of emergency break glass" situation.

[Lief 🗽]

Trump needs to jump on this. Put it in one of his classic instagram ads, tweet it, and watch it go viral.

[Torie]

Trump needs to jump on this. Put it in one of his classic instagram ads, tweet it, and watch it go viral.

What Rubio said is accurate.

[Maxwell]

Trump needs to jump on this. Put it in one of his classic instagram ads, tweet it, and watch it go viral.

With the #NotReadyForPrimeTime

[The Other Castro]

Congrats, nominee Trump.

[IceSpear]

Remember when the right wing crucified Chris Matthews for saying that Sandy was a positive development for Obama? I await the same outrage on this.

[Blue3]

Remember when the right wing crucified Chris Matthews for saying that Sandy was a positive development for Obama? I await the same outrage on this.

Obama didn't say it.

Rubio did.

[Mehmentum]

I don't think his statement is even accurate, unless he means the GE.

Regardless, it was a very inelegant way of saying this.  There were plenty of better ways to put this, that wouldn't be seen as making light of a tragedy.

[HagridOfTheDeep]

Not as damning as the title suggests.

[Likely Voter]

I think Rubio is happy the conversation has switched to national security because he doesn't want to talk about immigration.

[Brewer]

Rubio was simply saying that a positive development to result from the attacks was  that it might make the U.S. take the threat of terrorism more seriously. I disagree with Rubio, and think the U.S. has already traded too much security for liberty in the War on Terror, but let's keep this in context. He never said the attacks were good for his campaign.

It's a damning soundbite, and it will be used in a "in case of emergency break glass" situation.

Eh, I'm sure TRUMP will make good use of it very soon.

[heatmaster]

If Trump had said the same thing, there would have been a whatever shrug from the same people who are crucifying Rubio. I have to agree with Rubio, it was positive in a way it will wake people up to the reality of the threat that ISIS is, it was a positive event, yep I have just said it!  Paris was bound to happen and this attack illustrates how serious we should take ISIS,  I think Rubio in a very inarticulate way, stated something that needs to be aired, ISIS is a virus that needs to, and should be eradicated.