The Democratic case for expanding the map against Trump (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 02:11:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  The Democratic case for expanding the map against Trump (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Democratic case for expanding the map against Trump  (Read 1308 times)
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


« on: December 01, 2015, 05:44:40 PM »

Most of the House seats that Democrats could plausibly pick up are in swing and blue states like Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, New Jersey, Illinois, New York, Virginia, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Nevada, Washington, and California. If Clinton wants to take back the House, she might have to consider putting more resources in those states rather than expanding the map.

If she does try to expand the map, I hope she goes after Texas and Georgia, in hopes of building momentum towards winning those states in the 2020s. Unfortunately, there's really only one House seat in either state that Dems could pick up (TX-23). South Carolina, North Carolina, and Mississippi don't have any plausible Dem pick-ups.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.