The Tyrant's in his pants

[Filuwaúrdjan]

[Democratic Hawk]

I don't read The Sun - but I think it's fitting to see how the mighty have fallen

Dave

[minionofmidas]

Answers 2, 4 (if you don't take it too literally), and 5 all apply. Voted option 5.

[Peter]

Its not right that the Sun is printed whatsoever, but thats just me.

[Јas]

I would have thought that the Sun 'reading' (used for want of a better word) public could care less and are more interested in the back pages, agony aunts and of course page 3, after all as Bernard said, IIRC, of Sun readers, "[They] don't care who runs the country, as long as she's got big tits."

[Soup18]

This would be mildly homoerotic if I wasn't a real man

[Alcon]

The image doesn't seem to be loading...

[Machiavelli]

This would be mildly homoerotic if I wasn't a real man

LOL

[opebo]

I don't read The Sun - but I think it's fitting to see how the mighty have fallen

I would love to see Bush in a similar 'fallen' condition. 

[Alcon]

I can see it now. Tasteful headline.

[Hatman 🍁]

Turn to page 3 turn to page 3!

[??????????]

I voted option one but then I saw the last option. LAST OPTION FOR SURE!! I love page 3! The only thing worth a d*mn in that paper.

[Alcon]

I voted option one but then I saw the last option. LAST OPTION FOR SURE!! I love page 3! The only thing worth a d*mn in that paper.

Aren't you afraid that your wife is going to read this one day?

[patrick1]

"Relax guy."

Somebody told me the NY Post put this on the cover as well- good way to put people off their breakfast.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

I voted option one but then I saw the last option. LAST OPTION FOR SURE!! I love page 3! The only thing worth a d*mn in that paper.

And you make fun of me for liking strip clubs...

I've always wondered if you have to be 18 to buy the Sun. I know that when I was under 18 if I could I would definately buy it.

As for the pictures: who cares?

[Filuwaúrdjan]

I've always wondered if you have to be 18 to buy the Sun.

No. It classes as a "newspaper"... somehow... the Star is even worse.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Now if only we had it over here!

Of course it's pretty soft though, SI Swimsuit Edition isn't really much different, and I had plenty of those...

[minionofmidas]

BILD, with their typical hypocrisy, had it on the cover the following day - with the headline"Wirbel um Skandal-Fotos".

[Filuwaúrdjan]

But I thought BILD was a quality paper

[Democratic Hawk]

Does this constitute a violation of Saddam's human rights?

Frankly, those who violate the human rights of others (i.e. Saddam) forfeit their right to human rights - it's as simple as that

Dave

[Democratic Hawk]

I don't read The Sun - but I think it's fitting to see how the mighty have fallen

I would love to see Bush in a similar 'fallen' condition. 

I'm no Bush fan - but I don't think that GWB and Saddam Hussein are even remotely comparable

I would have liked to see Bush fall in November  - but it, sadly, it didn't happen

Dave

[minionofmidas]

Does this constitute a violation of Saddam's human rights?

Yes, it doubtlessly does.
Not a very grave one perhaps, though.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

There are much much more important things for people on all sides of the spectrum to care about than Saddam's human rights.

[Storebought]

Now, it is a fact of nature that British tabloids are the boils of humanity, the most pustulent of which being that rag called "The Guardian".  It is only the British tabloids' nature to show front page pic of Saddam wearing his Low-Hanging-Fruit of the Loom

What I really fault is the US military taking the picture in the first place. It seems really juvenile and un-American

[Jake]

There are much much more important things for people on all sides of the spectrum to care about than Saddam's human rights.

Thank you, I really hope no one loses sleep over pictures of a mass murderer in his underwear being published in a newspaper.