Question About Trump's 1999 Wealth Tax
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 10:50:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  Question About Trump's 1999 Wealth Tax
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Question About Trump's 1999 Wealth Tax  (Read 756 times)
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 07, 2015, 10:07:41 PM »
« edited: December 07, 2015, 10:14:10 PM by FreePhoenix »

We now stand closing in on 20 trillion in debt. Would quadrupling the rate he proposed back in the day still solve the debt in one swoop, or am I missing something?
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2015, 02:56:10 PM »
« Edited: December 08, 2015, 03:03:52 PM by King »

Paying off all the debt at once is totally pointless.  It was an interesting idea by Trump in 2000 since we were on pace to pay off the debt and he just wanted to rapid the pace, but to go from 18 trillion to 0 would be unnecessarily destructive.

If you are really a fiscal hawk, you just have to shrink debt as a percentage of GDP. Nominal numbers are worthless to consider with value of currency changing over time.

Our current debt is 18.7 trillion and our nominal GDP is 16.7 trillion. If we agreed to cut deficits to under $100 billion a year for the next 10 years, by Dec 2025 our debt would be 19.7 trillion but our nominal GDP would likely be 22 trillion or so at an average growth rate of 2% nominally. That means our debt as a percentage of GDP would reduce to the point where it would be equivalent of  having only 15 trillion in debt today.  That's 4 trillion in debt reduction without having to run a single surplus.

If you continue this trend for one hundred years, you'd get to the point where our debt would be around 30 trillion, but  hedged against a 100-150 trillion GDP.  A trillion dollars would be essentially be what a billion dollars is today and therefore not really an issue.

Inflation saves lives.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,261
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2015, 03:16:55 PM »

Are federal wealth taxes constitutional, even?
Logged
Taco Truck 🚚
Schadenfreude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 958
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2015, 05:23:03 PM »

We now stand closing in on 20 trillion in debt. Would quadrupling the rate he proposed back in the day still solve the debt in one swoop, or am I missing something?

Problems with wealth tax have been addressed already.
Logged
Hillary pays minimum wage
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 716
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2015, 12:17:20 AM »

Taxes won't solve our problems.  Our only answer is to elect real people not from the elite circles like Ted Kennedy and John Kerry.  There are hundreds of others in DC from both parties.  Those rats have been the two most offensive to my American ideals is all.  Max Baucus is another crook who gets away with everything.  I'm so glad all three of them are gone.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.