Bush Condemns S. Korea Stem Cell Advances
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 08:26:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Bush Condemns S. Korea Stem Cell Advances
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Poll
Question: Do you agree with President Bush?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
Other - explain
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 45

Author Topic: Bush Condemns S. Korea Stem Cell Advances  (Read 4267 times)
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: May 22, 2005, 03:21:25 PM »

I agree, and I believe that stem cell research should only be performed on stem cells that do not use embryonic sources or cloning.
Agreed
Logged
Nation
of_thisnation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,555
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: May 22, 2005, 04:11:36 PM »

Can't say I agree with Bush here. I've always been a supporter of stem cell research, and was one of the reasons I voted for Kerry.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: May 22, 2005, 04:12:31 PM »

So spend your own money on it
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,904


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: May 22, 2005, 11:15:25 PM »

Research just moves over to the states. Thankfully this is one area where the states have some sovereignty.
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: May 23, 2005, 01:28:58 AM »

While I support stem cell research, I don't support cloning to get the cells, and so in the end I sort of agree with the President.  Given the vast quantities of embryos in fertility clinics, it is morbid and unnecessary to clone to get cells.
Logged
MissCatholic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,424


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: May 23, 2005, 10:18:42 AM »

We have to make the debate science vs Religion to show how far right the republicans are becoming.

Darwins banning in Kansas is a case that can highlight it. Catholics, moderate protestants, muslims atheists all recognise that darwins theory is a theory and is valid in the classroom.

Stem-cell research is another case where the dems can make progress. we need to get it on state ballots.
Logged
Blue Rectangle
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,683


Political Matrix
E: 8.50, S: -0.62

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: May 23, 2005, 10:22:16 AM »

Religion has always been a threat to scientific progress.
That's an odd statement, considering that the only scientists for about 1000 years in Europe were monks.  Also, most all of the scientific work by the classical philosophers would have been lost, were it not for the Church during the Dark Ages.
Logged
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: May 23, 2005, 02:38:27 PM »

I completely support adult stem cell research which has made lots of progress over the past few years and is completely ethical. Embryonic Stem Cell Research and Cloning are very immoral and dangerous. It's messing with things were not meant to be messed with.

Christopher Reeves was used by the Hollywood Left and the Extremists in the Democratic Party who are trying to take over this country and force the lack of morality and responsiblity on all of us. Remember John Kerry saying if he was President, he would have allowed Christopher Reeves to get up and walk.
Logged
riceowl
riceowl315
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,357


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: May 23, 2005, 04:12:46 PM »

"...when John Kerry is president, people like Christopher Reeve will get up out of that wheelchair and walk again."
-John Edwards, 10.2004

What a douche.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,904


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: May 23, 2005, 10:36:02 PM »

Religion has always been a threat to scientific progress.
That's an odd statement, considering that the only scientists for about 1000 years in Europe were monks.

Yeah, and looked what they accomplished in those 1000 years (400-1400).

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

If they were so smart, why was their main task to preserve others' work?
Logged
beowulf
Rookie
**
Posts: 33


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: May 24, 2005, 12:09:44 PM »

thefactor, would you have thought back then to preserve old documents?  Would you have realized their value?
Logged
Blue Rectangle
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,683


Political Matrix
E: 8.50, S: -0.62

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: May 24, 2005, 02:47:02 PM »

Religion has always been a threat to scientific progress.
That's an odd statement, considering that the only scientists for about 1000 years in Europe were monks.

Yeah, and looked what they accomplished in those 1000 years (400-1400).

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

If they were so smart, why was their main task to preserve others' work?
Well it's not like the secular community was doing much to advance science or to even preserve the classical knowledge.  The rise of universities was mostly due to the clergy and it was they that advanced philosophy and medicine during the middle ages.

The idea that religion is the enemy of science is a very recent historical revision.  Those that complain today about Columbus and Galileo facing opposition from the Church conveniently forget (or simply do not know) that those discoverers faced opposition not because they contradicted Church theological dogma, but because they contradicted the classical theories of Pagan philosophers and scientists whose writings were protected and revered by the clergy.  The true conflict was between accepted scientific beliefs and new ideas, but the anti-religious folks have revised the conflict to be between dogmatic anti-science clergy and free-thinking intelligent humanists.  It is this revisionist history that leads to silly, blanket generalizations such as religion being the enemy of science.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,904


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: May 24, 2005, 05:54:08 PM »

thefactor, would you have thought back then to preserve old documents?  Would you have realized their value?

Heck, I still have my Calculus text book from 4 years ago. Of course.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 13 queries.