SE1- The School Rights Act of 2015 (passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:09:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SE1- The School Rights Act of 2015 (passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SE1- The School Rights Act of 2015 (passed)  (Read 505 times)
Leinad
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.03, S: -7.91

« on: December 17, 2015, 01:06:16 AM »

I like the concept. Ideas of any sort, religious or non-religious, shouldn't be shoved down anyone's throats, but especially the children.

However, maybe it should be a bit more clear? And perhaps more general, too. In other words, where the point is to keep schools from banning words other than the generally-accepted unacceptable words (i.e. F-bombs and the like). Like, of course a teacher has no right to ban "Merry Christmas," but also no right to ban saying the word "cargo" or whatever. (Random example, don't look for meaning in it.) My point is that it shouldn't be confined simply to religion/holidays.

Anyway, you'd think this would be common sense. It's sad how statists (of all flavors) keep thinking banning stuff helps anything. All it does is piss off the people who liked what you banned.
Logged
Leinad
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.03, S: -7.91

« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2015, 03:28:37 AM »

Good amendment, but I think it might be a good idea to just take out the part about banning words relating to holidays and religion. I mean, simply saying that banning non-profanity is a no-no in public schools (oh, that's another good addition, we shouldn't be dictating this to private schools) covers it pretty well.

I have an amended version, where I also move the "teachers cannot teach/force their religion on students" part to it's own section, reworded:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I think that's a good bill. What say you, Mr. Speaker?
Logged
Leinad
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,049
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.03, S: -7.91

« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2015, 07:20:19 PM »

X Leinad

And it is law!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.