PPP National: Close race for Clinton vs. all GOPers, only Rubio leads
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 06:18:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  PPP National: Close race for Clinton vs. all GOPers, only Rubio leads
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PPP National: Close race for Clinton vs. all GOPers, only Rubio leads  (Read 3311 times)
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,713


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 21, 2015, 02:15:54 PM »

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_122115.pdf

Clinton 46, Trump 43
Clinton 45, Carson 45
Clinton 45, Cruz 43
Clinton 44, Bush 39
Clinton 43, Rubio 44

Clinton 42, Cruz 26, Trump 23
Clinton 41, Rubio 27, Trump 24

Clinton 40, Trump 39, Independent 11

Sanders 41, Trump 43
Sanders 41, Bush 42
Sanders 41, Cruz 42
Sanders 41, Carson 41
Sanders 39, Rubio 42
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2015, 03:03:15 PM »

rofl lmao bush against clinton
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,759
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2015, 03:28:20 PM »

Not a 2012 scenario, but a narrow Clinton win is good enough.
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,901


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2015, 03:32:25 PM »

hillary at 38-55 approval
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2015, 03:48:54 PM »

Should the pattern of 2008 and 2012 hold, then Hillary Clinton could win despite losing 50.1-49.5 in the popular vote. It would all boil down to Colorado, Iowa, or Virginia.
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,579
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2015, 04:15:53 PM »

They also polled a Merkel-Trump matchup LOL.

Angela Merkel: 42%
Donald Trump: 29%

Merkel leads Trump among every demographic group. I wonder what the map would look like in that case?


"Who should have won person of the year" is a bit different from "Who would you vote for President".
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,759
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2015, 04:17:02 PM »

Sanders clearly isnt doimg better than Hillary and wind up like Kerry & Gore did with 257 electors. The other polls showing Sanders doing much better were off the mark!!
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 21, 2015, 04:53:18 PM »

Should the pattern of 2008 and 2012 hold, then Hillary Clinton could win despite losing 50.1-49.5 in the popular vote. It would all boil down to Colorado, Iowa, or Virginia.
You literally are just making sh**t up.
Logged
EliteLX
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,029
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.64, S: 0.85

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 21, 2015, 05:57:04 PM »

Jeb's GE numbers have took an absolute beating this past month and a half, bummer.

Rubio holds steady, Cruz holds strong to his ~2% chase. Interesting.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 22, 2015, 01:11:44 AM »

Sanders clearly isnt doimg better than Hillary and wind up like Kerry & Gore did with 257 electors. The other polls showing Sanders doing much better were off the mark!!

Stop posting.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,749
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 22, 2015, 01:50:30 AM »

Sanders clearly isnt doimg better than Hillary and wind up like Kerry & Gore did with 257 electors. The other polls showing Sanders doing much better were off the mark!!

Stop posting.

It's like I'm a reric. A rost reric from another time. You know? I dunno, sometime I feel like I outstayed my welcome. Is just how I feel, you know? It's like a-my grammar make people uncomftable or something. How a robot man is supposed to survive in this world? Oh welcome to Atlas, 272 fierwall prease.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,090
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 24, 2015, 11:24:15 AM »



Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,759
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 24, 2015, 12:51:42 PM »
« Edited: December 24, 2015, 12:53:41 PM by OC »

I wasnt really going after Sanders, but he has to do better in Iowa before he can beat her Iin NH. Otherwise, Clinton, who is 3 points ahead in NH will sweep all and win Nevada caucus. But, Sanders or Clinton can win 272 against Trump or Cruz, with the right Latino VP pick.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 24, 2015, 09:02:11 PM »

I wasnt really going after Sanders, but he has to do better in Iowa before he can beat her Iin NH. Otherwise, Clinton, who is 3 points ahead in NH will sweep all and win Nevada caucus. But, Sanders or Clinton can win 272 against Trump or Cruz, with the right Latino VP pick.

If Sanders is up big in NH i dont know what is stopping him.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,841
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 24, 2015, 10:02:13 PM »

Should the pattern of 2008 and 2012 hold, then Hillary Clinton could win despite losing 50.1-49.5 in the popular vote. It would all boil down to Colorado, Iowa, or Virginia.
You literally are just making sh**t up.

Based upon 2004, 2008, and 2012 results. Kerry could have gotten an even shift of votes and won Ohio with less than a plurality of the popular vote. 2008? Although winning by Reagan-like margins in some of the states that he won he lost with McGovern-like margins in many of the  states that he lost. 2012? His wins were shallower, but his losses were even worse.

Until I start seeing polls that show Hillary Clinton doing significantly better in states that Obama lost by huge margins and doing worse than Obama in states that he won, the political realities of the states indicate that Democrats still have an edge in a 50-50 Presidential election... an inverse of the reality with the House. 
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,759
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 24, 2015, 10:15:04 PM »

If the pattern holds, Nate Silver says path to WH for Clinton, isnt through Va, it is with Latinos and NV, CO & Pa. That's why Clinton should pick Castro and Sanders pick Solis.
Logged
Coolface Sock #42069
whitesox130
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,695
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.39, S: 2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 28, 2015, 05:41:12 PM »

Why is Jeb vs. Hillary still being polled?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 12 queries.