Which of these 2012 Dem states are the most likely to go GOP in 2016? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 04:28:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Which of these 2012 Dem states are the most likely to go GOP in 2016? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which 2012 Dem state is the most likely to go GOP in 2016?
#1
Oregon
 
#2
Washington
 
#3
New Mexico
 
#4
California
 
#5
Illinois
 
#6
New York
 
#7
Vermont
 
#8
Minnesota
 
#9
Maine
 
#10
Washington D.C (HA NO)
 
#11
Delaware
 
#12
Maryland
 
#13
New Jersey
 
#14
Connecticut
 
#15
Rhode Island
 
#16
Massachusetts
 
#17
Michigan
 
#18
Hawaii
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 71

Author Topic: Which of these 2012 Dem states are the most likely to go GOP in 2016?  (Read 2568 times)
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« on: December 25, 2015, 12:02:37 AM »

This list is notable by the absence of New Hampshire and Pennsylvania.  Tongue

yes but I'm trying to get states which arent considered battleground

NH isn't battleground.

To the real world it is.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 25, 2015, 12:48:37 PM »

This list is notable by the absence of New Hampshire and Pennsylvania.  Tongue

yes but I'm trying to get states which arent considered battleground

NH isn't battleground.

To the real world it is.

No wonder that Republicans can't win presidential elections in the real world then.

You can consistently lose a battleground state by a close margin and it can still be a battleground.  Face it, NH is usually pretty close, Republicans have won several races there over the last 20 years and it'll be contested because of this.  Merry Christmas.
Logged
Rockefeller GOP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United States


« Reply #2 on: December 26, 2015, 11:17:53 AM »

Utterly dumbfounded that MI has any votes, let alone is leading MN. Do the math people. Angry

Minnesota by default as the closest of those states in 2008. It just doesn't swing much in overall vote. It does swing severely against Republicans with respect to the national average in Republican blowouts -- as the second-worst state for Nixon in 1972 and the worst for Reagan in 1984. (It did go R+ in one of the Eisenhower elections, which says much about Ike). It was near the middle of the pack for Obama in 2008, though.

Voting habits are very rigid in Minnesota. The state just does not swing.

...Barack Obama is the most polarizing of Presidential nominees ever, winning some states as if a Democratic version of Reagan in 1984 and losing as if the second coming of George McGovern in some others. It is hard to see anyone with such a divide in voting for him and against him ever happening again. 

You know we've had an election since 2008, right?  I've never seen you cite a 2012 statistic, only 2008.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 15 queries.