Utterly dumbfounded that MI has any votes, let alone is leading MN. Do the math people.
Here's a sample of their math:
2016 UNITED STATES PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
U.S. Popular Vote: Trump 62% | Clinton 37%
Whites (80) Trump 66% | Clinton 33%
All Remaining Non-Whites (20) Trump 47% | Clinton 51%
Anyone who expects any Presidential nominee to win more than 60% of the vote is nuts at this stage. One can make a mathematical model that can predict anything... but even if one uses mathematical models to predict something absurd, the problem is not with the mathematics.
Boundary conditions are relevant. I played games with one of the models and I did not see Democrats winning in any Southern states other than VA, FL, and NC before Democrats picked up Indiana... A Democrat who gets 33% of the white vote in Mississippi is going to win Mississippi.
2008 and 2012 were freaks because Barack Obama was what he is. On the other hand, he won, and he showed that Democrats can largely write off rural areas with impunity. He knew how to get mass audiences available in urban and suburban areas (the distinction between cities and suburbs is weakening).