Federal Activity Requirements Statute (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 02:53:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Federal Activity Requirements Statute (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Federal Activity Requirements Statute  (Read 3508 times)
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« on: May 24, 2005, 04:33:20 PM »

I have no problems with this.  None whatsoever.  Smiley
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2005, 07:39:45 PM »

I agree with Gabu on this. 

The intent of the legislation is to say that when the election starts, your posts no longer count towards voting requirements. 

Couldn't be much clearer to me and this makes King's amendment rather unnecessary.

A more interesting question has to do with how this would deal with absentee voters, if need be.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2005, 07:50:45 PM »

A more interesting question has to do with how this would deal with absentee voters, if need be.

How about something like this:

5.  Anyone who has cast an absentee ballot shall be regarded as an active voter provided he or she fulfills the definition of an "active voter" for the purposes of the election for which the ballot was cast; however, the post containing the ballot shall not count towards the total number of required posts.

Sounds good to me.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2005, 10:29:58 PM »

Just a little nitpicking.  We can vote on this amendment, at the same time as the other one.

6.  This legislation shall take effect immediately upon its passage into law.

To make sure it is in effect for the upcoming federal election, or any special elections that could potentially happen before then.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2005, 04:01:53 PM »

Aye, Aye.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2005, 11:13:08 PM »

We need a provision for Absentee Ballots...

Isn't that what the proposed clause 5 does?

Maybe King was just saying this in support of the amendment, as in...

"We need a provision for absentee ballots...", therefore I vote for it. (or I'm at least guessing)

Anyway, these two amendments have passed now and this bill is much better.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #6 on: May 27, 2005, 07:43:05 PM »

I would like to motion to bring this thing to a vote.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #7 on: May 27, 2005, 07:46:30 PM »

Aye.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #8 on: May 29, 2005, 10:37:05 PM »

This legislation has passed.  Good.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #9 on: May 31, 2005, 04:50:26 PM »

Since it's been 24 hours since this one passed, can we get a new piece of legislation going?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.