Iowa poll (Loras, landlines +cellphone): Clinton 59%, Sanders 30%)

[A Perez]

January 13-18

http://loras.edu/About-Loras/News-Events/News/2016/Clinton-Maintains-Lead,-New-Loras-College-Poll-Fin.aspx

[A Perez]

CNN had a 53% male sample, despite males being 43% in 2008, expert says https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/690284590196473856

[A Perez]

Loras is a joke pollster. The Hillary people will be in shock and awe mode once the results come in because they see that she'll finally be sent into retirement. I will accept my chocolates later.

CNN is the joke pollster, picking the wrong winner in both Iowa and NH in 2008. They are good in non-primary elections. That's it.

[A Perez]

Hmm, you have newish/jokish Gravis and Loras showing her up by 20 or more.

And battle-tested Selzer, Quinnipiac, CNN, PPP etc. all showing a close race.

With which polls would you rather go ?

Do you think Clinton's lead in this poll is so high because they polled too many Blaxicasians?

The point is you're going with subpar college polls over more reputable companies just because you like the results of the subpar college polls better. When PPP, pro-Hillary house effect and all, shows a six point race, it's pretty clear that this poll is anything but accurate. Seriously, stop clouding yourself in fantasy land and realize that Hillary is AT BEST a 60% favorite (chance of winning) in IA, and is HIGHLY UNLIKELY to win NH.

When it comes to Iowa, CNN isn't reputable. Prove it.