Iowa poll (Loras, landlines +cellphone): Clinton 59%, Sanders 30%) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:25:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  Iowa poll (Loras, landlines +cellphone): Clinton 59%, Sanders 30%) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Iowa poll (Loras, landlines +cellphone): Clinton 59%, Sanders 30%)  (Read 3836 times)
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

« on: January 22, 2016, 02:29:13 PM »

I wonder if this race will go the way of 2000, where Bradley campaigned vigorously and was within 2-3% of Gore in the polls before caucus day... only to be trashed.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2016, 02:35:03 PM »

Straight into the trashcan with this one ...

Just close your eyes, cover your ears, it'll all be over soon. Smiley
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2016, 02:43:55 PM »

Loras is a joke pollster. The Hillary people will be in shock and awe mode once the results come in because they see that she'll finally be sent into retirement. I will accept my chocolates later.

Not unless the Blaxicasians have anything to say about it!
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2016, 02:52:53 PM »

Hmm, you have newish/jokish Gravis and Loras showing her up by 20 or more.

And battle-tested Selzer, Quinnipiac, CNN, PPP etc. all showing a close race.

With which polls would you rather go ?

Do you think Clinton's lead in this poll is so high because they polled too many Blaxicasians?
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2016, 03:05:48 PM »

Hmm, you have newish/jokish Gravis and Loras showing her up by 20 or more.

And battle-tested Selzer, Quinnipiac, CNN, PPP etc. all showing a close race.

With which polls would you rather go ?

Do you think Clinton's lead in this poll is so high because they polled too many Blaxicasians?

The point is you're going with subpar college polls over more reputable companies just because you like the results of the subpar college polls better. When PPP, pro-Hillary house effect and all, shows a six point race, it's pretty clear that this poll is anything but accurate. Seriously, stop clouding yourself in fantasy land and realize that Hillary is AT BEST a 60% favorite (chance of winning) in IA, and is HIGHLY UNLIKELY to win NH.

Ok, but nowhere in this thread did I ever say "I believe this poll!" so..?
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2016, 08:00:00 PM »

How can you be a Sanders supporter and also be stupid enough to own a fu ck ing landline? 

JUNK POLL!

Tell 'em!
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,756
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2016, 08:06:57 PM »

How can you be a Sanders supporter and also be stupid enough to own a fu ck ing landline? 

JUNK POLL!

Tell 'em!

I will.  The Hillbots are clinging to a poll of grandmas with landlines.  I'm also convinced they are the only Hillbots on the planet, because who the  can get excited for vote for Hillary Clinton? 

Grandmas were the only line of defense against Senator Joni Ernest in 2014! And they'll be back in 10 days. They're always back.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.