PA 6/PA 8
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 11:33:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  PA 6/PA 8
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 12
Author Topic: PA 6/PA 8  (Read 41447 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: May 27, 2005, 04:18:13 PM »

Well, we all know I'm cheering for Lois Murphy in 2006!!!!  Another NARAL/EMILY's List person in Congress is exactly what Pennsylvania needs!  GO LOIS!!  Game on now Phil!  Don't like my signature?  Tongue

I'm kind of worried about her because she could win (and the last thing we need is another Schwartz in the House) but it's not likely to happen. I'll admit, she almost pulled off the upset of the year here in PA last year. That was her chance. 2006 won't be that great of a year for turnout (compared to 2004) so she'll go down 53-47.

You said that before about Dan Wofford in 2002.  You laughed at me for picking PA 6 as an upset in November while you picked PA 13.  Who was closer?  I was WAAAAAY closer, almost won!

How could I say something about Dan Wofford in 2002 when I didn't join until June 2004? Plus, even if this argument was brought up in the past, I never remember saying Wofford would lose by that amount. I knew that was going to be a close one. You really need to grow up.

When I was making an argument for Lois Murphy, you were saying she's was not going to be as close as Wofford was.

And that has nothing to do with what you said I said. I said Murphy wouldn't make it close like Wofford did. You made it seem like I predicted Wofford to do poorly, too.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 01, 2005, 04:59:49 PM »

Another veteran running against Fitz...

http://politicspa.com/Press_Releases/0610105lang.htm

http://www.electlang.com/

He says he wants to give the district back Democrats and moderates because Fitz has gotten too cozy with the far right.  Roll Eyes
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 01, 2005, 05:04:53 PM »

I love this:

"affordable health care...access to higher education for all...stem cell research...economic tax breaks for the middle class...federal fiscal discipline"
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 16, 2005, 04:56:32 PM »

Very interesting stuff...

PoliticsPA.com


Robin Wiessmann Looking to Clear the 8th Congressional District Field

Multiple sources tell PoliticsPA that prominent businesswoman Robin Wiessmann is considering a run against Republican Congressman Mike Fitzpatrick.  Wiessmann, whose name has long been circulated, is said to be holding back until she can ensure a primary-free run.  Wiessmann is said to have the support of EMILY's List and a final decision on whether to enter the race will come in the next two weeks.

 

She serves as a Commissioner on the Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission and  is President of Brown/Wiessmann Group, a financial consulting firm in Newtown.

 

Wiessmann is the wife of prominent Democrat Ken Jarin, a Rendell fundraiser, member of the 2002 Rendell Transition Team and partner at the law firm of Ballard Spahr.  Jarin was ranked #15 in the PoliticsPA List of Pennsylvania's most powerful unelected personalities.  A sampling of his contributions to candidates for federal office over the last few cycles includes many Democrats and Senator Arlen Specter: Biden for Senate (DE), Borski for Congress, Bowles for Senate (NC), Carper for Senate (DE), Casey for Congress, Duval for Congress (AZ), Fattah for Congress, Foley for Senate, Gilman for Congress (NY), Gore for President, Gormley for Senate (NJ), Hoeffel for Congress, Holden for Congress, Johnson for Senate (SD), Kirk for Senate (TX), Landrieu for Senate (LA), Lautenberg for Senate (NJ), Levin for Senate (MI), Lieberman 2000, Maloney for Congress (NY), Menendez for Congress (NJ), Pryor for Senate (AR), Rodham Clinton for Senate (NY), Rovner for Senate, Schwartz for Senate, Schweitzer for Senate (MT), Shaheen for Senate (NH), Specter for Senate, Stabenow for Senate (MI), Swett for Congress (NH), and Wellstone for Senate (MN).

 

Rival Democrats Patrick Murphy and Paul Lang have not indicated they will pull out.




Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: June 17, 2005, 07:27:45 PM »

I'm liking this Paul Lang kid.  He's pro-choice, pro-stem cell whereas Patrick Murphy is holding his position on those issues.  I heard from an unqualified source Patrick Murphy opposes choice.  As bullmoose88 eluded to, Murphy has little chance.  In PA 8, the ONLY way a Democrat can win is if he/she is pro-choice.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: June 23, 2005, 04:39:43 PM »

Some PA 18 news...

State Senator Logan will not be running for Congress. Murphy is now very likely to win re-election in 2006. If Logan had run, this seat was seen potentially competitive race and maybe even a Dem pickup.


http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05174/527191.stm


...and news from Sherwood's district if the incumbent decides not to run again...

http://www.timesleader.com/mld/timesleader/11962987.htm
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: June 24, 2005, 12:58:48 AM »

Some PA 18 news...

State Senator Logan will not be running for Congress. Murphy is now very likely to win re-election in 2006. If Logan had run, this seat was seen potentially competitive race and maybe even a Dem pickup.


http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05174/527191.stm


...and news from Sherwood's district if the incumbent decides not to run again...

http://www.timesleader.com/mld/timesleader/11962987.htm

He should have run!   
Logged
Demoteen04
Rookie
**
Posts: 103


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: June 25, 2005, 10:25:42 PM »

Hello Im Back, Actually I am not really back I am living in Ocean City, NJ, but however keeping up with local politics by going to www.northeasttimes.com. I just want to say a democrat fro Parkwood located in the Far Northeast of Philadelphia I have to say I am supporting Patrick Murphy all the way he's a St. Anselm School, Alumni (so am I), he's also an Archbishop Ryan High School, Alumni( in June of 2007 I will be also), and lastly he's from Parkwood (the place where I reside). He's just what the democrats need for this seat. I will admit Ginny Schrader was not a good candidate, but Patrick Murphy will blow Fitzpatrick out of the woodwork. I'm signing out for awhile however if you want to get in touch with me email me at MFabbi1@hotmail.com which I check daily. See ya Later.
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: June 25, 2005, 10:30:14 PM »

Hello Im Back, Actually I am not really back I am living in Ocean City, NJ, but however keeping up with local politics by going to www.northeasttimes.com. I just want to say a democrat fro Parkwood located in the Far Northeast of Philadelphia I have to say I am supporting Patrick Murphy all the way he's a St. Anselm School, Alumni (so am I), he's also an Archbishop Ryan High School, Alumni( in June of 2007 I will be also), and lastly he's from Parkwood (the place where I reside). He's just what the democrats need for this seat. I will admit Ginny Schrader was not a good candidate, but Patrick Murphy will blow  out of the woodwork. I'm signing out for awhile however if you want to get in touch with me email me at MFabbi1@hotmail.com which I check daily. See ya Later.

Patrick Murphy sounds good, but to win in Bucks County as a Democrat, the candidate needs to be pro-choice and he's not.  Paul Lang and Robin Weissman (possibility of running) are.  My money is on Robin Weissman because she has a lot of political and fundraising clout.  She will also get an army of EMILY's List volunteers that Patrick Murphy will be lacking.  Granted Patrick Murphy will do well and likely win the NE Philly section of PA 8, but districtwide, he doesn't have a prayer. 
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: June 25, 2005, 10:31:28 PM »

He's just what the democrats need for this seat. I will admit Ginny Schrader was not a good candidate, but Patrick Murphy will blow  out of the woodwork. I'm signing out for awhile however if you want to get in touch with me email me at MFabbi1@hotmail.com which I check daily. See ya Later.

Hey, Mark. I must say that someone like Murphy is probably the weakest candidate you guys can put up. Wiessman is probably the strongest possible Democratic candidate but I still see Fitzpatrick winning this race by over five points.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: June 25, 2005, 10:33:14 PM »

Granted Patrick Murphy will do well and likely win the NE Philly section

It certainly helps that he's from the area but Fitzpatrick had a very strong showing there last year. I believe he got close to 60%. Against Murphy, it would be a close one. Against Wiesmann, Fitz easily carries the area.
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: June 25, 2005, 10:37:27 PM »

Granted Patrick Murphy will do well and likely win the NE Philly section

It certainly helps that he's from the area but  had a very strong showing there last year. I believe he got close to 60%. Against Murphy, it would be a close one. Against Wiesmann, Fitz easily carries the area.

Wiessman is a much stronger candidate than Ginny Schrader.  I think Wiessman would pull even in NE Philly.  Fitz's win there was attributed to the weakness of Schrader as a candidate, not his strength on the issues.  The one thing NE Philadelphians generally do is either listen to their union or church and the rest is character of candidate when going to the polls.  People here do not divulge on issues as much as we do or people in the suburbs or Center City. 
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: June 25, 2005, 10:40:42 PM »

Granted Patrick Murphy will do well and likely win the NE Philly section

It certainly helps that he's from the area but  had a very strong showing there last year. I believe he got close to 60%. Against Murphy, it would be a close one. Against Wiesmann, Fitz easily carries the area.

Wiessman is a much stronger candidate than Ginny Schrader.  I think Wiessman would pull even in NE Philly.  Fitz's win there was attributed to the weakness of Schrader as a candidate, not his strength on the issues.  The one thing NE Philadelphians generally do is either listen to their union or church and the rest is character of candidate when going to the polls.  People here do not divulge on issues as much as we do or people in the suburbs or Center City. 

Wiessman is stronger than Schrader but her views would be the end of her in the NE part of the district. They might not divulge on the issues as much as we do but they do have some sense of what's going on. On top of that, the unions tolerate Fitzpatrick. He won't have trouble in that area.
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: June 25, 2005, 10:49:50 PM »

Granted Patrick Murphy will do well and likely win the NE Philly section

It certainly helps that he's from the area but  had a very strong showing there last year. I believe he got close to 60%. Against Murphy, it would be a close one. Against Wiesmann, Fitz easily carries the area.

Wiessman is a much stronger candidate than Ginny Schrader.  I think Wiessman would pull even in NE Philly.  Fitz's win there was attributed to the weakness of Schrader as a candidate, not his strength on the issues.  The one thing NE Philadelphians generally do is either listen to their union or church and the rest is character of candidate when going to the polls.  People here do not divulge on issues as much as we do or people in the suburbs or Center City. 

Wiessman is stronger than Schrader but her views would be the end of her in the NE part of the district. They might not divulge on the issues as much as we do but they do have some sense of what's going on. On top of that, the unions tolerate . He won't have trouble in that area.

That's true and I recently talked to a Young Dem Steamfitter about Fitz. Fitz, like the NE Philly State Rep delegation, is union tolerated.  That maybe a problem for us, albeit if Fitz starts voting lockstep with Santorum and Hart, they will give him problems here.  I know Fitz brought in union labor into Bucks County for construction projects no other GOPer would, but he better have a decent AFL-CIO record in Congress for him to stay there.   
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: June 25, 2005, 11:00:02 PM »



That's true and I recently talked to a Young Dem Steamfitter about Fitz. Fitz, like the NE Philly State Rep delegation, is union tolerated.  That maybe a problem for us, albeit if Fitz starts voting lockstep with Santorum and Hart, they will give him problems here.  I know Fitz brought in union labor into Bucks County for construction projects no other GOPer would, but he better have a decent AFL-CIO record in Congress for him to stay there.   

I honestly don't see him having many problems with the unions. You have to remember that their main goal will be electing Casey. They won't be concerned about (nor really have the time to be) working against someone like Fitz when they really don't mind him anyway.
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: June 25, 2005, 11:06:50 PM »



That's true and I recently talked to a Young Dem Steamfitter about Fitz. Fitz, like the NE Philly State Rep delegation, is union tolerated.  That maybe a problem for us, albeit if Fitz starts voting lockstep with Santorum and Hart, they will give him problems here.  I know Fitz brought in union labor into Bucks County for construction projects no other GOPer would, but he better have a decent AFL-CIO record in Congress for him to stay there.   

I honestly don't see him having many problems with the unions. You have to remember that their main goal will be electing Casey. They won't be concerned about (nor really have the time to be) working against someone like Fitz when they really don't mind him anyway.

Bucks is a EMILY's List type county.  You know they will be pounding the pavement for Robin Wiessman if she got the nomination. 

On another note...  What I am personally concerned with as a Democrat is the fact that given my background I personally or possibly you may be rendered unelectable for certain offices.  It seems the ideal Democratic nominee is a shaw wearing, wealthy, pro-choice liberal Jewish woman and the ideal Republican is some Scotch drinking, wealthy, Country Club WASP male.  I know others have been elected, but it seems to be a political trend I've noticed.   
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: June 25, 2005, 11:20:13 PM »

Bucks is a EMILY's List type county.  You know they will be pounding the pavement for Robin Wiessman if she got the nomination.

I have no doubt that it will be closer than 2004 but I still see Fitz winning. 


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I don't think your stereotype is the case in Bucks. They are definetley more down to earth. Don't make the people out there into people from Montco.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: June 27, 2005, 10:24:41 PM »

Some PA 18 news...

State Senator Logan will not be running for Congress. Murphy is now very likely to win re-election in 2006. If Logan had run, this seat was seen potentially competitive race and maybe even a Dem pickup.


http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05174/527191.stm


...and news from Sherwood's district if the incumbent decides not to run again...

http://www.timesleader.com/mld/timesleader/11962987.htm

He should have run!   

I wish he would, but maybe some internal polling suggested that it wouldn't have been as close as you or I would have liked.  BTW, I don't really know what he would have to lose in running since I think his state senate seat was up in 2004 and therefore not in 2006.
Logged
bullmoose88
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,515


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: June 27, 2005, 10:34:45 PM »



That's true and I recently talked to a Young Dem Steamfitter about Fitz. Fitz, like the NE Philly State Rep delegation, is union tolerated.  That maybe a problem for us, albeit if Fitz starts voting lockstep with Santorum and Hart, they will give him problems here.  I know Fitz brought in union labor into Bucks County for construction projects no other GOPer would, but he better have a decent AFL-CIO record in Congress for him to stay there.   

I honestly don't see him having many problems with the unions. You have to remember that their main goal will be electing Casey. They won't be concerned about (nor really have the time to be) working against someone like Fitz when they really don't mind him anyway.

Bucks is a EMILY's List type county.  You know they will be pounding the pavement for Robin Wiessman if she got the nomination. 

On another note...  What I am personally concerned with as a Democrat is the fact that given my background I personally or possibly you may be rendered unelectable for certain offices.  It seems the ideal Democratic nominee is a shaw wearing, wealthy, pro-choice liberal Jewish woman and the ideal Republican is some Scotch drinking, wealthy, Country Club WASP male.  I know others have been elected, but it seems to be a political trend I've noticed.   

Fitz isn't a WASP...and he's from my township (actually if I were Catholic) we'd be in the same parish. And while my area isn't poor...its not crazy wealthy either.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: June 27, 2005, 11:15:32 PM »



Fitz isn't a WASP...and he's from my township (actually if I were Catholic) we'd be in the same parish. And while my area isn't poor...its not crazy wealthy either.

Yeah, Fitz comes off as a very modest, easy going guy. That's something he'll have going for him if the Dems nominate Wiessman.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: July 04, 2005, 08:19:10 PM »

It started out as a rumor but now it seems like it could happen. Barbara Hafer is moving closer to a run against Tim Murphy in PA 18. Hafer said that she needed more time with family to consider the race and, of course, had to speak with Governor Rendell. (I guess she's not trying to hide that Rendell owns her?)

My opinion: Let the Dems run Hafer. She won't get more than 45% of the vote.
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: July 04, 2005, 10:53:50 PM »

It started out as a rumor but now it seems like it could happen. Barbara Hafer is moving closer to a run against Tim Murphy in PA 18. Hafer said that she needed more time with family to consider the race and, of course, had to speak with Governor Rendell. (I guess she's not trying to hide that Rendell owns her?)

My opinion: Let the Dems run Hafer. She won't get more than 45% of the vote.

I hope Hafer runs for Lt. Gov., to be perfectly honest, just to shut her up for a bit.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: July 04, 2005, 10:56:15 PM »


I hope Hafer runs for Lt. Gov., to be perfectly honest, just to shut her up for a bit.

That will hurt the Dem ticket especially out west. Knoll actually has a strong following out there (as funny as that may sound).
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: July 13, 2005, 12:59:51 PM »

PA 6 a national bellwhether?

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/nation/3261974
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: July 13, 2005, 01:12:03 PM »

...and news from Sherwood's district if the incumbent decides not to run again...

http://www.timesleader.com/mld/timesleader/11962987.htm

If Birmelin was to run, he'd easily defeat the candidates that have been mentioned so far. One is a novice from Susquehanna County that would be trashed in a general election and one is Greg Skrepanek, a former NFL lineman and Luzerne County Commissioner. He'd make it a race and give the Democrats a good candidate, but the parts of Luzerne County in PA-10 are conservative rural and rich suburban areas where Birmelin would do well. All this is rather unlikely as I am fairly certain Sherwood will run next year.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 12  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 12 queries.